World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5649
World Ranking
10449
National Ranking
5489

Todd J. Maurer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd J. Maurer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 68 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Todd J. Maurer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd J. Maurer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Todd J. Maurer is affiliated with Georgia State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Psychology, with specific contributions to several subfields including Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Clinical Psychology, Education, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist has published multiple papers, with recent works spanning topics such as leadership dynamics and developmental reflection in management. Notable recent papers include:

  • Gains and Losses: Week-To-Week Changes in Leader-Follower Relationships (2022, Academy of Management Journal)
  • Toward better understanding developmental reflection differences for use in management development research and practice (2020, Journal of Management Development)

Their research covers a range of topics where they have made contributions across multiple publications. These topics include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Reflective Practices in Education
  • Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

Frequent collaborators of Todd J. Maurer include Nikolaos Dimotakis, A.J. Corner, Lisa Schurer Lambert, Sherry Fu, and Artemis Boulamatsi. These coauthors have contributed alongside Maurer in various research projects, reflecting interdisciplinary and collaborative approaches in their work.

The scientist has published in respected academic venues with a focus on management and psychology. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Academy of Management Journal
  • Journal of Management Development

Todd J. Maurer's professional recognitions include being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2004, indicating a level of distinction within the psychological community.

Best Publications

  • A model of involvement in work-related learning and development activity: the effects of individual, situational, motivational, and age variables.

    Todd J Maurer;Elizabeth M Weiss;Francisco G Barbeite

  • Investigation of perceived environment, perceived outcome, and person variables in relationship to voluntary development activity by employees.

    Todd J. Maurer;Beverly A. Tarulli

  • Career-relevant learning and development, worker age, and beliefs about self-efficacy for development

    Todd J. Maurer

  • A comparison of Likert scale and traditional measures of self-efficacy.

    Todd J. Maurer;Heather R. Pierce

  • Perceived Beneficiary of Employee Development Activity: A Three-Dimensional Social Exchange Model

    Todd J. Maurer;Heather R. Pierce;Lynn M. Shore

  • Predictors of attitudes toward a 360-degree feedback system and involvement in post-feedback management development activity

    Todd J. Maurer;Debora R. D. Mitchell;Francisco G. Barbeite

  • Peer and subordinate performance appraisal measurement equivalence.

    Todd J. Maurer;Nambury S. Raju;William C. Collins

  • Employee Learning and Development Orientation: Toward an Integrative Model of Involvement in Continuous Learning

    Todd J. Maurer

  • The Effects of Knowledge Management on Team Members' Ratings of Project Success and Impact*

    Donald B. Fedor;Soumen Ghosh;Steven D. Caldwell;Todd J. Maurer

  • New measures of stereotypical beliefs about older workers' ability and desire for development

    Unknown

  • Beliefs about ‘improvability’ of career‐relevant skills: relevance to job/task analysis, competency modelling, and learning orientation

    Todd J. Maurer;Kimberly A. Wrenn;Heather R. Pierce;Stuart A. Tross

  • Structural model of employee involvement in skill development activity: The role of individual differences

    Todd J. Maurer;Michael Lippstreu;Timothy A. Judge

  • Who will be committed to an organization that provides support for employee development

    Unknown

  • Beliefs About Older Workers' Learning and Development Behavior in Relation to Beliefs About Malleability of Skills, Age‐Related Decline, and Control1

    Kimberly A. Wrenn;Todd J. Maurer

  • Management development intentions following feedback – Role of perceived outcomes, social pressures, and control

    Todd J. Maurer;Jerry K. Palmer

  • Positive and Negative Assessment Center Feedback in Relation to Development Self-Efficacy, Feedback Seeking, and Promotion

    Unknown

  • Traditional, Likert, and Simplified Measures of Self-Efficacy

    Todd J. Maurer;Kimberly D. Andrews

  • Ten years of career success in relation to individual and situational variables from the employee development literature

    Unknown

  • Acceptance of peer/upward performance appraisal systems: Role of work context factors and beliefs about managers' development capability

    Todd J. Maurer;Beverly A. Tarulli

  • TOWARD UNDERSTANDING AND MANAGING STEREOTYPICAL BELIEFS ABOUT OLDER WORKERS’ ABILITY AND DESIRE FOR LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT

    Todd J Maurer;Kimberly A Wrenn;Elizabeth M Weiss

  • Interviewee coaching, preparation strategies, and response strategies in relation to performance in situational employment interviews: an extension of Maurer, Solamon, and Troxtel (1998).

    Todd J. Maurer;Jerry M. Solamon;Kimberly D. Andrews;Deborah D. Troxtel

  • Relationship of coaching with performance in situational employment interviews.

    Todd Maurer;Jerry Solamon;Deborah Troxtel

  • An Exploration of Cognitive Demands in Group Interaction as a Moderator of Information Processing Variables in Perceptions of Leadership

    Todd J. Maurer;Robert G. Lord

  • METHODOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOMETRIC ISSUES IN SETTING CUTOFF SCORES USING THE ANGOFF METHOD

    Todd J. Maurer;Ralph A. Alexander;Cathy M. Callahan;Jeff J. Bailey

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert G. Lord
Robert G. Lord Durham University
Lynn M. Shore
Lynn M. Shore Colorado State University
Donald B. Fedor
Donald B. Fedor Georgia Institute of Technology
Michael J. Burke
Michael J. Burke Tulane University
Vinod R. Singhal
Vinod R. Singhal Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up a wealth of career pathways, with Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) being one of the most popular. Those pursuing this profession can benefit from flexible online degree programs that offer coursework in counseling, behavioral health, and clinical practice.

It’s important to understand that educational credentials and licensure requirements can vary by state and city. For instance, if you want information on how to become an mft in Jersey City, you’ll find that specific coursework and supervised clinical hours are key factors in the process.

Similarly, mft requirements in Kansas City, mft requirements in Laredo, and Las Vegas mft education requirements highlight unique steps and prerequisites for licensure in each region.

Whether you plan to work locally or across state lines, researching state-specific licensing regulations and accredited online programs is crucial for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Todd J. Maurer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles