World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
9314
World Ranking
10026
National Ranking
5282

Donald B. Fedor publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald B. Fedor sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Donald B. Fedor D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald B. Fedor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald B. Fedor is affiliated with the Georgia Institute of Technology in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a focus on research conducted within this institution.

The available data does not indicate recent papers authored by Donald B. Fedor, nor does it list frequent co-authors or specific publication venues where this scientist regularly publishes. There is also no information about books published or awards received.

Details on their main fields of study, subfields, and primary research topics are not available in the provided data. As such, an overview of specific areas of expertise or thematic focuses is not possible.

The absence of detailed bibliometric information and records of collaborations suggests the public academic footprint available from this data is limited to their association with the Georgia Institute of Technology.

Best Publications

  • The effects of transformational and change leadership on employees' commitment to a change: a multilevel study.

    David M. Herold;Donald B. Fedor;Steven Caldwell;Yi Liu

  • THE EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES ON EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT: A MULTILEVEL INVESTIGATION

    Donald B. Fedor;Steven Caldwell;David M. Herold

  • Beyond change management: a multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees' commitment to change.

    David M. Herold;Donald B. Fedor;Steven D. Caldwell

  • Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: a cross-level study.

    Steven D. Caldwell;David M. Herold;Donald B. Fedor

  • The behavioral expression of organizational commitment

    Donna M Randall;Donald B Fedor;Clinton O Longenecker

  • Investigating newcomer expectations and job-related outcomes

    M. Ronald Buckley;Donald B. Fedor;John G. Veres;Danielle S. Wiese

  • Volunteer Participation and Withdrawal

    Steven M. Farmer;Donald B. Fedor

  • Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance

    Robert W. Renn;Donald B. Fedor

  • AN INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS EXPECTED TO AFFECT FEEDBACK SEEKING: A LONGITUDINAL FIELD STUDY

    Donald B. Fedor;Roger B. Rensvold;Susan M. Adams

  • Myth Making: A Qualitative Step in OD Interventions:

    David M. Boje;Donald B. Fedor;Kendrith M. Rowland

  • Putting upward influence strategies in context

    Steven M. Farmer;John M. Maslyn;Donald B. Fedor;Jodi S. Goodman

  • Changing the focus on volunteering: an investigation of volunteers’ multiple contributions to a charitable organization

    Steven M. Farmer;Donald B. Fedor

  • Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: the roles of source power and recipient self-esteem

    Donald B. Fedor;Walter D. Davis;John M. Maslyn;Kieran Mathieson

  • Myths and Politics in Organizational Contexts

    Gerald R. Ferris;Donald B. Fedor;J.Gregory Chachere;Louis R. Pondy

  • DISPOSITIONAL INFLUENCES ON TRANSFER OF LEARNING IN MULTISTAGE TRAINING PROGRAMS

    David M. Herold;Walter Davis;Donald B. Fedor;Charles K. Parsons

  • Peer and Upward Appraisals A Comparison of their Benefits and Problems

    Kenneth L. Bettenhausen;Donald B. Fedor

  • The Ethical Imperative to Provide Recruits Realistic Job Previews

    M. Ronald Buckley;Donald B. Fedor;Shawn M. Carraher;Dwight D. Frink

  • The Contribution of Positive Politics to the Prediction of Employee Reactions

    Donald Fedor;John Maslyn;Steven Farmer;Kenneth Bettenhausen

  • Perceptions of politics: Does measuring different foci matter?

    John M. Maslyn;Donald B. Fedor

  • The contributory effects of supervisor intentions on subordinate feedback responses

    Donald B Fedor;Robert W Eder;M.Ronald Buckley

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Herold
David M. Herold Queensland University of Technology
Gerald R. Ferris
Gerald R. Ferris Florida State University
M. Ronald Buckley
M. Ronald Buckley University of Oklahoma
Joseph F. Porac
Joseph F. Porac New York University
Shawn M. Carraher
Shawn M. Carraher Harvard University
Lucy Gilson
Lucy Gilson University of Cape Town
Greg R. Oldham
Greg R. Oldham Tulane University
Todd J. Maurer
Todd J. Maurer Georgia State University
Christina E. Shalley
Christina E. Shalley Georgia Institute of Technology
David G. Allen
David G. Allen Texas Christian University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology, there are a variety of online degrees and pathways that can help you reach your goals. Many students choose to specialize in fields like substance abuse counseling, which remains in high demand across the United States.

Requirements for becoming a counselor can vary by location. For instance, those interested in substance abuse counselor requirements in Gilbert should be aware of specific local educational and licensing criteria. Similarly, substance abuse counselor requirements in Glendale may require you to meet state-mandated coursework and supervised clinical hours.

In North Carolina, Greensboro substance abuse counselors education requirements include obtaining the right academic credentials and completing significant hands-on experience. The process for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Henderson, Nevada, also highlights the importance of accredited degrees and passing relevant examinations.

No matter the location, earning an online degree in psychology offers flexibility, making it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments. By researching program requirements and local regulations, you can set a clear path toward meaningful roles in counseling, human services, and mental health advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Donald B. Fedor

Recently Published Articles