World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5088 4720 2793 2528 123 26315

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben between 2002 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben published across 22 years, from 2002 to 2023, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2010. 3 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2010. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications
2002 2023

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben: publications per year, 2002 to 2023
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 4
2004 8
2005 4
2006 9
2007 8
2008 10
2009 7
2010 15
2011 7
2012 10
2013 15
2014 9
2015 10
2016 8
2017 3
2018 4
2019 4
2020 0
2021 2
2022 1
2023 2
Total 141
Download as CSV

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 123
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Business, Management and Accounting, with a particular focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Health Information Management, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Healthcare Policy and Management

Halbesleben has contributed to several recent papers. Notably, their work includes "Examining regulatory focus in the acceleration and deceleration of engagement and exhaustion cycles among nurses," published in 2023 in Health Care Management Review, and "Chief Executive Officers' Perceptions of Collective Organizational Engagement and Patient Experience in Acute Care Hospitals," published in 2021 in the Journal of Patient Experience.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • M. Ronald Buckley
  • Anthony R. Wheeler
  • John E. Baur
  • Samantha C. Paustian-Underdahl
  • Dawn S. Carlson

Halbesleben's research has appeared in venues such as:

  • Health Care Management Review
  • Journal of Patient Experience

In addition to journal articles, Halbesleben has a book publication titled "Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management," published in 2020 under the publisher Research in personnel and human resources management. This work has garnered citations reflecting its utilization in the field.

In recognition of their professional contributions, Halbesleben was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences

    Stevan E. Hobfoll;Jonathon Halbesleben;Jean-Pierre Neveu;Mina Westman

  • Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the Role of Resources in Conservation of Resources Theory

    Jonathon Halbesleben;Jean-Pierre Neveu;Samantha Paustian-Underdahl;Mina Westman

  • Burnout in Organizational Life

    Jonathon R.B. Halbesleben;M. Ronald Buckley

  • Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Anthony R. Wheeler

  • Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Wm. Matthew Bowler

  • The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Evangelia Demerouti

  • Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Jaron Harvey;Mark C. Bolino

  • To Invest or Not? The Role of Coworker Support and Trust in Daily Reciprocal Gain Spirals of Helping Behavior

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Anthony R. Wheeler

  • Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion

    Marilyn V. Whitman;Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Oscar Holmes

  • Nurse burnout and patient safety outcomes: nurse safety perception versus reporting behavior.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Bonnie J. Wakefield;Douglas S. Wakefield;Lynn B. Cooper

  • Productive and counterproductive job crafting: A daily diary study.

    Evangelia Demerouti;Arnold B. Bakker;Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • Work-arounds in health care settings: Literature review and research agenda.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Douglas S. Wakefield;Bonnie J. Wakefield

  • Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: a team-level study.

    Hannes Leroy;Bart Dierynck;Frederik Anseel;Tony L. Simons

  • Awareness of temporal complexity in leadership of creativity and innovation: A competency-based model

    Jonathon R.B. Halbesleben;Milorad M. Novicevic;Michael G. Harvey;M.Ronald Buckley

  • The role of exhaustion and workarounds in predicting occupational injuries: a cross-lagged panel study of health care professionals.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • Exploring Different Operationalizations of Employee Engagement and Their Relationships With Workplace Stress and Burnout

    Paula E. Anthony-McMann;Andrea D. Ellinger;Marina Astakhova;Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co‐worker abuse

    Anthony R. Wheeler;Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Marilyn V. Whitman

  • I owe you one: Coworker reciprocity as a moderator of the day‐level exhaustion–performance relationship

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Anthony R. Wheeler

Frequent Co-Authors

M. Ronald Buckley
M. Ronald Buckley University of Oklahoma
Pamela L. Perrewé
Pamela L. Perrewé Florida State University
Dawn S. Carlson
Dawn S. Carlson Baylor University
Mina Westman
Mina Westman Tel Aviv University
Milorad M. Novicevic
Milorad M. Novicevic University of Mississippi
K. Michele Kacmar
K. Michele Kacmar Texas State University
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology
Mark C. Bolino
Mark C. Bolino University of Oklahoma
Stevan E. Hobfoll
Stevan E. Hobfoll Rush University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a degree in psychology, you may also be interested in related online degrees such as social work, counseling, or human services. These fields share many foundational skills and offer diverse career pathways in both clinical and community settings.

Social work, in particular, is a growing area with strong demand for professionals. Programs are available nationwide, and many universities now offer flexible online options. For those seeking top programs by region, you can explore the best social work degrees in Louisiana or look into the best social work degree programs in Memphis for targeted options in these states.

Those interested in a more urban setting might benefit from reviewing the best social work degrees in Miami, known for culturally diverse learning environments. Additionally, if you prefer the heartland, consider the best social work degree programs in the Midwest for highly ranked institutions.

Completing an online psychology or social work degree can open doors to roles in mental health services, schools, healthcare organizations, or public policy, offering impactful and meaningful career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles