World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
26315
World Ranking
5088
National Ranking
2793

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 123 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben is affiliated with the University of Alabama in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Business, Management and Accounting, with a particular focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Health Information Management, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Healthcare Policy and Management

Halbesleben has contributed to several recent papers. Notably, their work includes "Examining regulatory focus in the acceleration and deceleration of engagement and exhaustion cycles among nurses," published in 2023 in Health Care Management Review, and "Chief Executive Officers' Perceptions of Collective Organizational Engagement and Patient Experience in Acute Care Hospitals," published in 2021 in the Journal of Patient Experience.

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • M. Ronald Buckley
  • Anthony R. Wheeler
  • John E. Baur
  • Samantha C. Paustian-Underdahl
  • Dawn S. Carlson

Halbesleben's research has appeared in venues such as:

  • Health Care Management Review
  • Journal of Patient Experience

In addition to journal articles, Halbesleben has a book publication titled "Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management," published in 2020 under the publisher Research in personnel and human resources management. This work has garnered citations reflecting its utilization in the field.

In recognition of their professional contributions, Halbesleben was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences

    Stevan E. Hobfoll;Jonathon Halbesleben;Jean-Pierre Neveu;Mina Westman

  • Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the Role of Resources in Conservation of Resources Theory

    Jonathon Halbesleben;Jean-Pierre Neveu;Samantha Paustian-Underdahl;Mina Westman

  • Burnout in Organizational Life

    Jonathon R.B. Halbesleben;M. Ronald Buckley

  • Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Anthony R. Wheeler

  • Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Wm. Matthew Bowler

  • The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Evangelia Demerouti

  • Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Jaron Harvey;Mark C. Bolino

  • To Invest or Not? The Role of Coworker Support and Trust in Daily Reciprocal Gain Spirals of Helping Behavior

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Anthony R. Wheeler

  • Abusive supervision and feedback avoidance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion

    Marilyn V. Whitman;Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Oscar Holmes

  • Nurse burnout and patient safety outcomes: nurse safety perception versus reporting behavior.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Bonnie J. Wakefield;Douglas S. Wakefield;Lynn B. Cooper

  • Productive and counterproductive job crafting: A daily diary study.

    Evangelia Demerouti;Arnold B. Bakker;Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • Work-arounds in health care settings: Literature review and research agenda.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Douglas S. Wakefield;Bonnie J. Wakefield

  • Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: a team-level study.

    Hannes Leroy;Bart Dierynck;Frederik Anseel;Tony L. Simons

  • Awareness of temporal complexity in leadership of creativity and innovation: A competency-based model

    Jonathon R.B. Halbesleben;Milorad M. Novicevic;Michael G. Harvey;M.Ronald Buckley

  • The role of exhaustion and workarounds in predicting occupational injuries: a cross-lagged panel study of health care professionals.

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • Exploring Different Operationalizations of Employee Engagement and Their Relationships With Workplace Stress and Burnout

    Paula E. Anthony-McMann;Andrea D. Ellinger;Marina Astakhova;Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

  • The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co‐worker abuse

    Anthony R. Wheeler;Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Marilyn V. Whitman

  • I owe you one: Coworker reciprocity as a moderator of the day‐level exhaustion–performance relationship

    Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben;Anthony R. Wheeler

Frequent Co-Authors

M. Ronald Buckley
M. Ronald Buckley University of Oklahoma
Pamela L. Perrewé
Pamela L. Perrewé Florida State University
Dawn S. Carlson
Dawn S. Carlson Baylor University
Mina Westman
Mina Westman Tel Aviv University
Milorad M. Novicevic
Milorad M. Novicevic University of Mississippi
K. Michele Kacmar
K. Michele Kacmar Texas State University
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology
Mark C. Bolino
Mark C. Bolino University of Oklahoma
Stevan E. Hobfoll
Stevan E. Hobfoll Rush University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a degree in psychology, you may also be interested in related online degrees such as social work, counseling, or human services. These fields share many foundational skills and offer diverse career pathways in both clinical and community settings.

Social work, in particular, is a growing area with strong demand for professionals. Programs are available nationwide, and many universities now offer flexible online options. For those seeking top programs by region, you can explore the best social work degrees in Louisiana or look into the best social work degree programs in Memphis for targeted options in these states.

Those interested in a more urban setting might benefit from reviewing the best social work degrees in Miami, known for culturally diverse learning environments. Additionally, if you prefer the heartland, consider the best social work degree programs in the Midwest for highly ranked institutions.

Completing an online psychology or social work degree can open doors to roles in mental health services, schools, healthcare organizations, or public policy, offering impactful and meaningful career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathon R. B. Halbesleben

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles