World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
5082
World Ranking
9021
National Ranking
3810

Anthony P. Auger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony P. Auger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Anthony P. Auger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony P. Auger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony P. Auger is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the disciplines of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, psychology, and neuroscience.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

The subfields of study they contribute to are:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Social Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Research topics central to their work include:

  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Recent publications by Anthony P. Auger encompass studies on social behavior, hormonal mechanisms, and stress impacts in animal models. Key works include:

  • Brain, behavior, and physiological changes associated with predator stress-An animal model for trauma exposure in adult and neonatal rats, 2024, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • Early life stress during the neonatal period alters social play and Line1 during the juvenile stage of development, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Mu opioid receptors in the medial preoptic area govern social play behavior in adolescent male rats, 2020, Genes Brain & Behavior
  • Testosterone-related behavioral and neural mechanisms associated with location preferences: A model for territorial establishment, 2020, Hormones and Behavior
  • Early life stress increases Line1 within the developing brain in a sex-dependent manner, 2020, Brain Research

The venues where they frequently publish include:

  • Brain Research
  • Genes Brain & Behavior
  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • Hormones and Behavior

Collaborations are a notable component of their research output. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Liza Chang
  • Amelia Cuarenta
  • Stacey L. Kigar
  • Vaishali P. Bakshi
  • Catherine A. Marler

Best Publications

  • CNS Region-Specific Oxytocin Receptor Expression: Importance in Regulation of Anxiety and Sex Behavior

    Tracy L. Bale;Aline M. Davis;Anthony P. Auger;Daniel M. Dorsa

  • The epigenetics of sex differences in the brain.

    Margaret M. McCarthy;Anthony P. Auger;Tracy L. Bale;Geert J. De Vries

  • Winning territorial disputes selectively enhances androgen sensitivity in neural pathways related to motivation and social aggression

    Matthew J. Fuxjager;Robin M. Forbes-Lorman;Dylan J. Coss;Catherine J. Auger

  • Steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) mediates the development of sex-specific brain morphology and behavior

    Anthony P. Auger;Marc J. Tetel;Margaret M. McCarthy

  • Sex Differences in Epigenetic Regulation of the Estrogen Receptor-α Promoter within the Developing Preoptic Area

    Joseph R. Kurian;Kristin M. Olesen;Anthony P. Auger

  • Getting excited about GABA and sex differences in the brain

    Margaret M McCarthy;Anthony P Auger;Tara S Perrot-Sinal

  • Brain sex differences and the organisation of juvenile social play behaviour.

    Anthony P. Auger;Kristin M. Olesen

  • Nuclear receptor coactivators modulate hormone-dependent gene expression in brain and female reproductive behavior in rats.

    Heather A. Molenda;Andreana L. Griffin;Anthony P. Auger;Margaret M. McCarthy

  • Epigenetic control of vasopressin expression is maintained by steroid hormones in the adult male rat brain

    Catherine J. Auger;Dylan Coss;Anthony P. Auger;Robin M. Forbes-Lorman

  • Dopaminergic Activation of Estrogen Receptors in Neonatal Brain Alters Progestin Receptor Expression and Juvenile Social Play Behavior

    Kristin M. Olesen;Heather M. Jessen;Catherine J. Auger;Anthony P. Auger

  • Gender differences in neurodevelopment and epigenetics.

    Wilson C. J. Chung;Anthony P. Auger

  • Mecp2 organizes juvenile social behavior in a sex-specific manner.

    Joseph R. Kurian;Meaghan E. Bychowski;Robin M. Forbes-Lorman;Catherine J. Auger

  • Sex Difference in the Expression of DNA Methyltransferase 3a in the Rat Amygdala During Development

    M. H. Kolodkin;A. P. Auger

  • Progesterone-Independent Activation of Rat Brain Progestin Receptors by Reproductive Stimuli

    Anthony P. Auger;Christopher A. Moffatt;Jeffrey D. Blaustein

  • Expression of the Nuclear Receptor Coactivator, cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein, Is Sexually Dimorphic and Modulates Sexual Differentiation of Neonatal Rat Brain

    Anthony P. Auger;T. S. Perrot-Sinal;C. J. Auger;L. A. Ekas

  • Neonatal iron status is impaired by maternal obesity and excessive weight gain during pregnancy

    Alyssa K. Phillips;Sheila C. Roy;Rebecca Lundberg;Theresa W. Guilbert

  • Sex difference in mecp2 expression during a critical period of rat brain development.

    Joseph R Kurian;Robin M Forbes-Lorman;Anthony P Auger

  • Sex differences in epigenetic mechanisms may underlie risk and resilience for mental health disorders.

    Heather M. Jessen;Anthony P. Auger

  • Epigenetic impact of simulated maternal grooming on estrogen receptor alpha within the developing amygdala.

    Michelle N. Edelmann;Anthony P. Auger

  • Who's in charge? Nuclear receptor coactivator and corepressor function in brain and behavior

    Marc J. Tetel;Anthony P. Auger;Thierry D. Charlier

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret M. McCarthy
Margaret M. McCarthy University of Maryland, Baltimore
Catherine A. Marler
Catherine A. Marler University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jessica A. Mong
Jessica A. Mong University of Maryland, Baltimore
Diane C. Gooding
Diane C. Gooding University of Wisconsin–Madison
Stuart C. Sealfon
Stuart C. Sealfon Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Geert J. De Vries
Geert J. De Vries Georgia State University
Nancy G. Forger
Nancy G. Forger Georgia State University
Paul Greengard
Paul Greengard Rockefeller University
Thierry Charlier
Thierry Charlier Université de Rennes
Daniel M. Dorsa
Daniel M. Dorsa Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience can lead to diverse professional opportunities, often overlapping with fields such as psychology, social work, counseling, and therapy. If you are interested in related online pathways, you have several options to consider.

For those drawn to understanding human behavior, psychology degrees are among the most popular online programs. These degrees can prepare you for roles in research, counseling, or organizational settings. If you wish to work with individuals or families facing challenges, you might explore mft accredited programs, which focus on marriage and family therapy and are tailored for those seeking a career in clinical practice.

Aspiring social workers may wonder how long does it take to get a msw online. Program lengths can vary, but fully online options offer increased flexibility for working students. Those looking for advanced practice or leadership roles in psychology might consider an online psyd, which emphasizes clinical skills and applied practice over research.

Exploring these related online degrees can open up a wide range of career pathways connected to neuroscience, blending scientific inquiry with the chance to make a positive impact in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony P. Auger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles