World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5073 4707 2782 2519 69 54822

Greg R. Oldham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Greg R. Oldham between 1974 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Greg R. Oldham published across 51 years, from 1974 to 2024, averaging 1.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1976. 3 of the 73 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1974 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1976. 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication
1974 2024

73 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Greg R. Oldham: publications per year, 1974 to 2024
Year Publications
1974 2
1975 2
1976 7
1977 1
1978 3
1979 2
1980 0
1981 1
1982 2
1983 2
1984 0
1985 1
1986 2
1987 4
1988 2
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 3
1998 1
1999 3
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 4
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 2
2011 2
2012 3
2013 0
2014 3
2015 2
2016 3
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
Total 73
Download as CSV

Greg R. Oldham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg R. Oldham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 69
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Greg R. Oldham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Greg R. Oldham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1986 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Greg R. Oldham is affiliated with Tulane University in the United States, contributing primarily to the field of Psychology. Their research spans subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management.

The scientist's recent publication record includes work in prominent journals such as the Journal of Applied Psychology and the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. Key papers include:

  • Enhancing employee creativity: Effects of choice, rewards and personality. (2021) Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Some Reflections on a Career in Organizational Behavior (2024) Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Research topics associated with Greg R. Oldham encompass:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Coauthor collaborations appear with several researchers, including:

  • Jing Zhou
  • Aichia Chuang
  • Ryan Shuwei Hsu
  • Miguel Machado
  • Filipe Coelho

The venues that have published their work focus on applied and organizational psychology contexts, reflecting an engagement with topics at the intersection of psychological research and workplace behavior.

Over the course of their career, Greg R. Oldham has received recognition such as:

  • Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), 1986
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Best Publications

  • Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory.

    J.Richard Hackman;Greg R. Oldham

  • Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey

    J. Richard Hackman;Greg R. Oldham

  • Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work

    Greg R. Oldham;Anne Cummings

  • The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here?

    Christina E. Shalley;Jing Zhou;Greg R. Oldham

  • The Job Diagnostic Survey: An Instrument for the Diagnosis of Jobs and the Evaluation of Job Redesign Projects

    J. R. Hackman;Greg R. Oldham

  • There's No Place like Home? The Contributions of Work and Nonwork Creativity Support to Employees' Creative Performance

    Nora Madjar;Greg R. Oldham;Michael G. Pratt

  • The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity.

    Markus Baer;Greg R. Oldham

  • A New Strategy for Job Enrichment

    J. Richard Hackman;Greg Oldham;Robert Janson;Kenneth Purdy

  • Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research

    Greg R. Oldham;J. Richard Hackman

  • Rewarding creativity: when does it really matter?

    Markus Baer;Greg R Oldham;Anne Cummings

  • Work design as an approach to person-environment fit

    Carol T Kulik;Greg R Oldham;J.Richard Hackman

  • Conditions Under Which Employees Respond Positively to Enriched Work.

    Greg R. Oldham;J. Richard Hackman;Jone L. Pearce

  • Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts for the High Potential Employee

    Anne Cummings;Greg R. Oldham

  • Employee Reactions to an Open-Plan Office: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment.

    Greg R. Oldham;Daniel J. Brass

  • Job design research and theory: Past, present and future

    Greg R. Oldham;Yitzhak Fried

  • Relationships between organization structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks

    Unknown

  • Enhancing Creative Performance: Effects of Expected Developmental Assessment Strategies and Creative Personality

    Jing Zhou;Greg R. Oldham

  • Win or Lose the Battle for Creativity: The Power and Perils of Intergroup Competition

    Markus Baer;Roger Th. A. J. Leenders;Greg R. Oldham;Abhijeet K. Vadera

  • Organizational climate: Relationship to organizational structure, process and performance

    Edward E. Lawler;Douglas T. Hall;Greg R. Oldham

  • Relationships between Office Characteristics and Employee Reactions: A Study of the Physical Environment.

    Greg R. Oldham;Nancy L. Rotchford

  • Relations Between Situational Factors and the Comparative Referents Used by Employees

    Greg R. Oldham;Carol T. Kulik;Lee P. Stepina;Maureen L. Ambrose

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol T. Kulik
Carol T. Kulik University of South Australia
J. Richard Hackman
J. Richard Hackman Harvard University
Christina E. Shalley
Christina E. Shalley Georgia Institute of Technology
Maureen L. Ambrose
Maureen L. Ambrose University of Central Florida
Manuel London
Manuel London Stony Brook University
Daniel J. Brass
Daniel J. Brass University of Kentucky
Gerald R. Ferris
Gerald R. Ferris Florida State University
Yitzhak Fried
Yitzhak Fried Texas Tech University
Jone L. Pearce
Jone L. Pearce University of California, Irvine
Donald B. Fedor
Donald B. Fedor Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology can open doors to a range of related fields—one of the most popular being speech-language pathology (SLP). Students with backgrounds in psychology often pursue online master's programs to qualify for roles such as speech therapist or SLP, which combine communication sciences and behavioral health expertise.

Pursuing a career in speech-language pathology generally requires a graduate-level degree, supervised clinical experience, and state-specific licensure. To understand the process, explore the slp requirements in Pennsylvania and compare them with the slp requirements in Rhode Island. Each state has unique standards regarding education, exams, and supervised practice.

If you’re interested in working in the Southeast, learn more about becoming a speech therapist in South Carolina. For those looking at options in the Midwest, read about how to become a speech language pathologist in South Dakota. Researching state requirements is key to selecting the best education pathway and preparing for a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Greg R. Oldham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles