World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
J. Richard Hackman

J. Richard Hackman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
65516
World Ranking
4473
National Ranking
2483

J. Richard Hackman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Richard Hackman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

J. Richard Hackman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Richard Hackman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Richard Hackman was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their academic contributions primarily focused on fields related to social psychology, organizational behavior and human resource management, and communication.

Their research topics covered team dynamics and performance, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, as well as knowledge management and sharing. These topics appeared consistently across their publications.

Hackman published in notable academic venues including:

  • Organization Science
  • Budkavlen

Their recent papers included:

  • Caught Between a Clock and a Hard Place: Temporal Ambivalence and Time (Mis)management in Teams (2023), published in Organization Science
  • Sex bygderedares livskarriärer (2023), published in Budkavlen

Frequent coauthors who collaborated with Hackman were:

  • Colin M. Fisher
  • Sujin Jang

The body of work indicated a strong focus on how teams manage time and dynamics, as well as how organizational behavior influences knowledge sharing and job satisfaction. Hackman's contributions to these areas added to ongoing conversations in both academic research and applied organizational contexts.

Best Publications

  • Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory.

    J.Richard Hackman;Greg R. Oldham

  • Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey

    J. Richard Hackman;Greg R. Oldham

  • The design of work in the 1980s

    J.Richard Hackman

  • Employee reactions to job characteristics.

    J. Richard Hackman;Edward E. Lawler

  • Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual, and practical issues.

    J. Richard Hackman;Ruth Wageman

  • Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration

    J. Richard Hackman;Charles G. Morris

  • Behavior in Organizations

    Lyman W. Porter;Edward E. Lawler;J. Richard. Hackman

  • Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances

    J. Richard Hackman

  • Group influences on individuals in organizations.

    J. Richard Hackman

  • A theory of team coaching

    J. Richard Hackman;Ruth Wageman

  • A New Strategy for Job Enrichment

    J. Richard Hackman;Greg Oldham;Robert Janson;Kenneth Purdy

  • Habitual routines in task-performing groups.

    Unknown

  • Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research

    Greg R. Oldham;J. Richard Hackman

  • Work design as an approach to person-environment fit

    Carol T Kulik;Greg R Oldham;J.Richard Hackman

  • Conditions Under Which Employees Respond Positively to Enriched Work.

    Greg R. Oldham;J. Richard Hackman;Jone L. Pearce

  • Team Diagnostic Survey: Development of an Instrument

    Ruth Wageman;J. Richard Hackman;Erin Lehman

  • Learning more by crossing levels: evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras

    J. Richard Hackman

  • Relationships between organization structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks

    Unknown

  • The psychology of self-management in organizations

    Unknown

  • Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research.

    Unknown

  • Impact of employee participation in the development of pay incentive plans: A field experiment.

    Edward E. Lawler;J. Richard Hackman

  • Effects of size and task type on group performance and member reactions

    J. Richard Hackman;Neil Vidmar

  • Work redesign and motivation

    J. Richard Hackman

  • THEORY OF TEAM COACHING

    J. Richard Hackman

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward E. Lawler
Edward E. Lawler University of Southern California
Greg R. Oldham
Greg R. Oldham Tulane University
Christopher F. Chabris
Christopher F. Chabris Geisinger Health System
Lyman W. Porter
Lyman W. Porter University of California, Irvine
Stephen M. Kosslyn
Stephen M. Kosslyn Harvard University
Jone L. Pearce
Jone L. Pearce University of California, Irvine
Sim B. Sitkin
Sim B. Sitkin Duke University
Neil Vidmar
Neil Vidmar Duke University
Lucian L. Leape
Lucian L. Leape Harvard University
Carol T. Kulik
Carol T. Kulik University of South Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways. One of the fastest-growing and highly specialized fields is speech-language pathology. As a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP), you work directly with individuals to assess, diagnose, and treat speech and communication disorders.

For those considering this career, it’s essential to understand that certification and licensing requirements vary by state. For instance, the Maryland speech pathologist certification requirements outline specific education, clinical experience, and examination standards. Similarly, those interested in working in New England should review the slp requirements in Massachusetts for a clear understanding of local guidelines.

The Michigan slp certification requirements provide another example of unique steps and assessment details within the Midwest. Likewise, aspiring SLPs in the upper Midwest should consult the slp requirements in Minnesota to ensure they meet all educational and licensing demands.

Many universities now offer flexible online programs, allowing students to achieve the needed credentials while balancing other commitments. Carefully researching state-specific requirements is the key to a smooth journey into this impactful profession.

Best Scientists Citing J. Richard Hackman