World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Christopher F. Chabris

Christopher F. Chabris

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3290 3032 1854 1669 138 33465

Christopher F. Chabris publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher F. Chabris between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher F. Chabris published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2019. 20 of the 196 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2019. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 8 publications
1987 2025

196 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher F. Chabris: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 3
1994 4
1995 6
1996 1
1997 0
1998 2
1999 4
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 2
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 2
2008 4
2009 3
2010 8
2011 2
2012 12
2013 9
2014 7
2015 9
2016 7
2017 8
2018 12
2019 15
2020 3
2021 11
2022 10
2023 10
2024 12
2025 8
Total 196
Download as CSV

Christopher F. Chabris publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher F. Chabris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 138 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 138
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher F. Chabris D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher F. Chabris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Christopher F. Chabris is affiliated with the Geisinger Health System in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in public health, economics, decision sciences, and sociology. Their work spans a range of disciplines with a strong emphasis on vaccine coverage, behavioral economics, and the impacts of misinformation.

The scientist's research prominently focuses on topics including:

  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • COVID-19 Epidemiological Studies

Their frequent coauthors reflect collaborations across related fields, featuring:

  • Michelle N. Meyer
  • Amir Goren
  • Patrick R. Heck
  • Maheen Shermohammed
  • Katherine L. Milkman

Chabris's publications are often found in high-impact venues, with multiple papers published in:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science

Among noteworthy recent papers are:

  • A megastudy of text-based nudges encouraging patients to get vaccinated at an upcoming doctor's appointment, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • A 680,000-person megastudy of nudges to encourage vaccination in pharmacies, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Putting the Self in Self-Correction: Findings From the Loss-of-Confidence Project, 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Can You Ever Be Too Smart for Your Own Good? Comparing Linear and Nonlinear Effects of Cognitive Ability on Life Outcomes, 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • A Mega-Study of Text-Based Nudges Encouraging Patients to Get Vaccinated at an Upcoming Doctor's Appointment, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal

The topics and venues indicate a focus on interdisciplinary research combining behavioral science, health economics, and epidemiology. The scientist's studies often employ large-scale megastudies and meta-analytic methods to evaluate interventions promoting public health actions, such as vaccination uptake.

Their publication history shows consistent engagement with research that merges psychological science with health policy, reflecting expertise in decision sciences and health system evaluations. The range of frequent publication venues also suggests contributions to evolving topics in neuropsychopharmacology and psychological perspectives on societal challenges.

Best Publications

  • Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.

    Daniel J Simons;Christopher F Chabris

  • Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups

    Anita Williams Woolley;Christopher F. Chabris;Christopher F. Chabris;Alexander Pentland;Nada Hashmi

  • Gene discovery and polygenic prediction from a genome-wide association study of educational attainment in 1.1 million individuals

    James J. Lee;Robbee Wedow;Aysu Okbay;Edward Kong

  • Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value: fMRI and Behavioral Evidence

    Itzhak Aharon;Nancy Etcoff;Dan Ariely;Christopher F Chabris;Christopher F Chabris

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment

    Aysu Okbay;Jonathan P. Beauchamp;Mark Alan Fontana;James J. Lee

  • Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence.

    Jeremy R. Gray;Christopher F. Chabris;Todd S. Braver

  • Do “Brain-Training” Programs Work?:

    Daniel J. Simons;Walter R. Boot;Neil Charness;Susan E. Gathercole

  • The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us

    Christopher F. Chabris;Daniel J. Simons

  • GWAS of 126,559 Individuals Identifies Genetic Variants Associated with Educational Attainment

    Cornelius A. Rietveld;Sarah E. Medland;Jaime Lane Derringer;Jian Yang

  • Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: Pet investigations

    Stephen M. Kosslyn;Nathaniel M. Alpert;William L. Thompson;Vera Maljkovic

  • Genome-wide association analyses of risk tolerance and risky behaviors in over 1 million individuals identify hundreds of loci and shared genetic influences

    Richard Karlsson Linnér;Richard Karlsson Linnér;Pietro Biroli;Edward Kong;S. Fleur W. Meddens;S. Fleur W. Meddens

  • Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments

    Laura Germine;Laura Germine;Ken Nakayama;Bradley C. Duchaine;Christopher F. Chabris

  • Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior

    Christopher F. Chabris;David I. Laibson;Carrie L. Morris;Jonathon P. Schuldt

  • Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable

    Jeremy B. Wilmer;Laura Germine;Christopher F. Chabris;Garga Chatterjee

  • How not to be Seen: The Contribution of Similarity and Selective Ignoring to Sustained Inattentional Blindness

    Steven B. Most;Daniel J. Simons;Brian J. Scholl;Rachel Jimenez

  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence

    Suzanne Sniekers;Sven Stringer;Kyoko Watanabe;Philip R Jansen;Philip R Jansen

  • Activation of the fusiform gyrus when individuals with autism spectrum disorder view faces

    Nouchine Hadjikhani;Robert M. Joseph;Josh Snyder;Christopher F. Chabris

  • The Fourth Law of Behavior Genetics

    Christopher F. Chabris;James J. Lee;David Cesarini;Daniel J. Benjamin

  • Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations

    Stephen M. Kosslyn;Christopher F. Chabris;Chad J. Marsolek;Olivier Koenig

  • Abnormal asymmetry in language association cortex in autism

    Martha R. Herbert;Gordon J. Harris;Kristen T. Adrien;David A. Ziegler

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 74 loci associated with educational attainment

    Aysu Okbay;Jonathan P. Beauchamp;Mark Alan Fontana;James J. Lee

Frequent Co-Authors

David Laibson
David Laibson Harvard University
Daniel J. Benjamin
Daniel J. Benjamin University of California, Los Angeles
David Cesarini
David Cesarini New York University
Philipp D. Koellinger
Philipp D. Koellinger Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Magnus Johannesson
Magnus Johannesson Stockholm School of Economics
Patrik K. E. Magnusson
Patrik K. E. Magnusson Karolinska Institute
Peter M. Visscher
Peter M. Visscher University of Oxford
Dalton Conley
Dalton Conley Princeton University
Danielle Posthuma
Danielle Posthuma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Tonu Esko
Tonu Esko University of Tartu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to a range of rewarding online degrees and career paths in mental health and counseling. Many choose to become licensed mental health counselors, a journey that typically requires at least a master’s degree and supervised clinical hours.

Specific requirements can vary by location. If you are interested in regional details, check out the Omaha mental health counselor education requirements and the Orlando mental health counselor education requirements. For those in other cities, you may want to learn how to become a mental health counselor in Philadelphia or become a mental health counselor in Phoenix.

Many accredited universities now offer flexible online programs, making it easier for students to balance studies with other responsibilities. No matter where you are based, online psychology degrees provide the foundational knowledge to pursue diverse roles in counseling, therapy, and mental health services across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher F. Chabris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles