World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul G. Schaberg

Paul G. Schaberg

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
44
Citations
6791
World Ranking
3065
National Ranking
769

Paul G. Schaberg publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G. Schaberg sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 135 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Paul G. Schaberg D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G. Schaberg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul G. Schaberg is a researcher affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their work primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on various subfields such as Atmospheric Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Mechanical Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, and Plant Science.

The main topics addressed in their research include tree root and stability studies, seedling growth and survival studies, tree-ring climate responses, forest insect ecology and management, climate change and permafrost, cryospheric studies and observations, and forest ecology and management.

They have contributed to a range of publications, with recent papers including:

  • Phenology, cold injury and growth of American chestnut in a Range-Wide provenance test, 2022, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Experimental approach and initial forest response to a simulated ice storm experiment in a northern hardwood forest, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • The DendroEcological Network: A cyberinfrastructure for the storage, discovery and sharing of tree-ring and associated ecological data, 2020, Dendrochronologia
  • Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems, 2020, Journal of Visualized Experiments

Frequent co-authors working alongside Paul G. Schaberg include Gary J. Hawley, Paula F. Murakami, Lindsey E. Rustad, Christopher F. Hansen, and John L. Campbell.

Their research has appeared multiple times in venues such as the Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Journal of Visualized Experiments, PLoS ONE, Dendrochronologia, and Forest Ecology and Management.

Best Publications

  • Seasonal dynamics and age of stemwood nonstructural carbohydrates in temperate forest trees

    Andrew D. Richardson;Mariah S. Carbone;Trevor F. Keenan;Claudia I. Czimczik

  • ACID RAIN IMPACTS ON CALCIUM NUTRITION AND FOREST HEALTH

    Donald H. DeHayes;Paul G. Schaberg;Gary J. Hawley;G. Richard Strimbeck

  • Unravelling the evolution of autumn colours: an interdisciplinary approach

    Marco Archetti;Thomas F. Döring;Snorre B. Hagen;Nicole M. Hughes

  • Age, allocation and availability of nonstructural carbon in mature red maple trees.

    Mariah S. Carbone;Claudia I. Czimczik;Trevor F. Keenan;Paula F. Murakami

  • Do Nutrient Limitation Patterns Shift from Nitrogen Toward Phosphorus with Increasing Nitrogen Deposition Across the Northeastern United States

    K. F. Crowley;B. E. McNeil;G. M. Lovett;C. D. Canham

  • Regional assessment of N saturation using foliar and root δ15N

    L. H. Pardo;P. H. Templer;C. L. Goodale;S. Duke

  • Anthropogenic alterations of genetic diversity within tree populations: Implications for forest ecosystem resilience

    Paul G. Schaberg;Donald H. DeHayes;Gary J. Hawley;Samuel E. Nijensohn

  • Remote sensing of spring phenology in northeastern forests: A comparison of methods, field metrics and sources of uncertainty

    Katharine White;Jennifer Pontius;Jennifer Pontius;Paul Schaberg

  • Extreme low temperature tolerance in woody plants.

    Richard Strimbeck;Paul G. Schaberg;Carl Gunnar Fossdal;Wolfgang Schröder

  • Long-Term Integrated Studies Show Complex and Surprising Effects of Climate Change in the Northern Hardwood Forest

    Peter M. Groffman;Lindsay E. Rustad;Pamela H. Templer;John L. Campbell

  • Distribution and mixing of old and new nonstructural carbon in two temperate trees.

    Andrew D. Richardson;Mariah S. Carbone;Mariah S. Carbone;Brett A. Huggett;Brett A. Huggett;Morgan E. Furze

  • Influence of experimental snow removal on root and canopy physiology of sugar maple trees in a northern hardwood forest

    Daniel P. Comerford;Paul G. Schaberg;Pamela H. Templer;Anne M. Socci

  • Anthropogenic calcium depletion: a unique threat to forest ecosystem health?

    Paul G. Schaberg;Donald H. DeHayes;Gary J. Hawley

  • Associations of calcium and aluminum with the growth and health of sugar maple trees in Vermont

    Paul G. Schaberg;James W. Tilley;Gary J. Hawley;Donald H. DeHayes

  • Influence of simulated snow cover on the cold tolerance and freezing injury of yellow‐cedar seedlings

    Paul G. Schaberg;Paul E. Hennon;David V. D'amore;Gary J. Hawley

  • Factors influencing red expression in autumn foliage of sugar maple trees

    P.G. Schaberg;A.K. Van Den Berg;P.F. Murakami;J.B. Shane

  • Long-term calcium addition increases growth release, wound closure, and health of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) trees at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest

    Brett A. Huggett;Brett A. Huggett;Paul G. Schaberg;Paul G. Schaberg;Gary J. Hawley;Gary J. Hawley;Christopher Eager;Christopher Eager

  • Shifting Climate, Altered Niche, and a Dynamic Conservation Strategy for Yellow-Cedar in the North Pacific Coastal Rainforest

    Paul E. Hennon;David V. D'Amore;Paul G. Schaberg;Dustin T. Wittwer

  • Midwinter dehardening of montane red spruce during a natural thaw

    G.R. Strimbeck;P.G. Schaberg;D.H. DeHayes;J.B. Shane

  • Seasonal patterns of carbohydrate reserves in red spruce seedlings

    P.G. Schaberg;M.C. Snyder;J.B. Shane;J.R. Donnelly

  • Regional Assessment of N Saturation using Foliar and Root <img src="/fulltext-image.asp?format=htmln

    Linda H. Pardo;Pamela H. Templer;Christine L. Goodale;Sara E. Duke;Sara E. Duke

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary J. Hawley
Gary J. Hawley University of Vermont
Peter M. Groffman
Peter M. Groffman City University of New York
Timothy J. Fahey
Timothy J. Fahey Cornell University
Charles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll Syracuse University
Lindsey E. Rustad
Lindsey E. Rustad US Forest Service
Steven S. Perakis
Steven S. Perakis United States Geological Survey
Pamela H. Templer
Pamela H. Templer Boston University
Mark E. Fenn
Mark E. Fenn US Forest Service
Claudia I. Czimczik
Claudia I. Czimczik University of California, Irvine
Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Paul G. Schaberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles