World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert F. Grant

Robert F. Grant

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
13840
World Ranking
2604
National Ranking
111

Robert F. Grant publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert F. Grant sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 195 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert F. Grant D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert F. Grant sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Robert F. Grant is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their research spans multiple disciplines within environmental and earth sciences with a focus on understanding ecosystem dynamics, climate change impacts, and soil processes.

The main fields of study for Robert F. Grant include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, their work addresses several subfields, such as:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Soil Science
  • Ecology
  • Plant Science

They have contributed extensively to topics including:

  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Robert F. Grant has published frequently in several scientific journals, with the most common venues being:

  • Environmental Research Letters
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Nature Communications
  • Field Crops Research
  • Biogeosciences

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Robert F. Grant illustrate the range and focus of their research:

  • "Arctic tundra shrubification: a review of mechanisms and impacts on ecosystem carbon balance," 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment," 2020, Nature Plants
  • "Sustainable irrigation based on co-regulation of soil water supply and atmospheric evaporative demand," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Changes in precipitation and air temperature contribute comparably to permafrost degradation in a warmer climate," 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • "Knowledge-guided machine learning can improve carbon cycle quantification in agroecosystems," 2024, Nature Communications

Throughout their career, Robert F. Grant has collaborated with various researchers, frequently co-authoring publications with:

  • W. J. Riley
  • Z. A. Mekonnen
  • Bin Peng
  • Kaiyu Guan
  • Jinyun Tang

Best Publications

  • Uncertainty in Simulating Wheat Yields Under Climate Change

    S. Asseng;F. Ewert;C. Rosenzweig;J. W. Jones

  • Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis

    Andrew D. Richardson;Ryan S. Anderson;M. Altaf Arain;Alan G. Barr

  • Multimodel ensembles of wheat growth: many models are better than one

    Pierre Martre;Pierre Martre;Daniel Wallach;Senthold Asseng;Frank Ewert

  • A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

    Kevin Schaefer;Christopher R. Schwalm;Chris Williams;M. Altaf Arain

  • Water Deficit Timing Effects on Yield Components in Maize

    R. F. Grant;B. S. Jackson;J. R. Kiniry;G. F. Arkin

  • Forest resilience and tipping points at different spatio-temporal scales: approaches and challenges

    Christopher P. O. Reyer;Niels Brouwers;Anja Rammig;Barry W. Brook

  • A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

    Christopher R. Schwalm;Christopher A. Williams;Kevin Schaefer;Ryan S. Anderson

  • Arctic tundra shrubification: a review of mechanisms and impacts on ecosystem carbon balance

    Zelalem A Mekonnen;William J Riley;Logan T Berner;Nicholas J Bouskill

  • OAK FOREST CARBON AND WATER SIMULATIONS: MODEL INTERCOMPARISONS AND EVALUATIONS AGAINST INDEPENDENT DATA

    P. J. Hanson;J. S. Amthor;S. D. Wullschleger;K. B. Wilson

  • Terrestrial biosphere model performance for inter‐annual variability of land‐atmosphere CO2 exchange

    T.F. Keenan;Ian Baker;Alan Barr;Philippe Ciais

  • Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment

    Bin Peng;Kaiyu Guan;Jinyun Tang;Elizabeth A. Ainsworth

  • Boreal forest CO2 exchange and evapotranspiration predicted by nine ecosystem process models: Intermodel comparisons and relationships to field measurements

    Jeffrey S Amthor;J M Chen;Joy S Clein;Steve Frolking

  • Modeling the Effects of Fertilizer Application Rate on Nitrous Oxide Emissions

    R. F. Grant;E. Pattey;T. W. Goddard;L. M. Kryzanowski

  • Expansion of high-latitude deciduous forests driven by interactions between climate warming and fire

    Zelalem A Mekonnen;William J Riley;James T Randerson;Robert F Grant

  • Simulation of carbon and nitrogen transformations in soil: mineralization.

    R.F. Grant;N.G. Juma;W.B. McGill

  • Soil Microbial Respiration at Different Water Potentials and Temperatures: Theory and Mathematical Modeling

    R. F. Grant;P. Rochette

  • Changes in Soil Organic Matter under Different Tillage and Rotation: Mathematical Modeling in ecosys

    R. F. Grant

  • Modelling plant carbon and nitrogen dynamics of a boreal aspen forest in CLASS — the Canadian Land Surface Scheme

    S Wang;R.F Grant;D.L Verseghy;T.A Black

  • Sustainable irrigation based on co-regulation of soil water supply and atmospheric evaporative demand.

    Jingwen Zhang;Kaiyu Guan;Bin Peng;Ming Pan

  • Modelling variability in N2O emissions from fertilized agricultural fields

    R.F. Grant;E. Pattey

  • Canopy temperature for simulation of heat stress in irrigated wheat in a semi-arid environment: a multi-model comparison

    Heidi Webber;Pierre Martre;Senthold Asseng;Bruce Kimball

  • Long-Term Changes in Soil Carbon under Different Fertilizer, Manure, and Rotation

    R.F. Grant;N.G. Juma;J.A. Robertson;R.C. Izaurralde

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Riley
William J. Riley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Alan G. Barr
Alan G. Barr University of Saskatchewan
T. A. Black
T. A. Black University of British Columbia
Senthold Asseng
Senthold Asseng Technical University of Munich
Peter J. Thorburn
Peter J. Thorburn Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Bruno Basso
Bruno Basso Michigan State University
Peter M. Lafleur
Peter M. Lafleur Trent University
Roberto C. Izaurralde
Roberto C. Izaurralde University of Maryland, College Park
Davide Cammarano
Davide Cammarano Aarhus University
Shusen Wang
Shusen Wang Natural Resources Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences can open doors to diverse career paths, many of which are accessible through online education. For those considering a straightforward entry into this field, identifying the easiest bachelor's degree to get can be a strategic starting point, balancing workload with foundational knowledge.

Specialized programs such as the best online geology degree equip students with critical understanding of Earth's processes, which is essential for careers in natural resource management and environmental consulting.

Additionally, acquiring skills in spatial analysis through top-rated GIS degree programs is increasingly valuable for managing environmental data and supporting sustainable development projects.

For those seeking leadership roles in public policy and environmental administration, pursuing the best online masters in public administration can enhance management expertise, preparing graduates to influence environmental regulations and community planning effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Robert F. Grant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles