World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
34670
World Ranking
8622
National Ranking
4447

Andrew N. Redington publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew N. Redington sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 516 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrew N. Redington D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew N. Redington sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew N. Redington is affiliated with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Epidemiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

The main topics of Andrew N. Redington's work encompass:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Justin T. Tretter
  • Vibeke E. Hjortdal
  • Colin J. McMahon
  • Jonathan Windram
  • Raman Kumar

Andrew N. Redington has published multiple papers in various scientific journals, with frequent contributions to venues such as:

  • Cardiology in the Young
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Notable recent papers include:

  • Lifespan Perspective on Congenital Heart Disease Research, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Prevalence of ICU Delirium in Postoperative Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Patients, 2020, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
  • Heart University: a new online educational forum in paediatric and adult congenital cardiac care. The future of virtual learning in a post-pandemic world?, 2020, Cardiology in the Young
  • Non-invasive left ventricular myocardial work indices in healthy adolescents at rest, 2021, International journal of cardiac imaging
  • Are e-learning Webinars the future of medical education? An exploratory study of a disruptive innovation in the COVID-19 era, 2020, Cardiology in the Young

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study

    Michael A Gatzoulis;Michael A Gatzoulis;Seshadri Balaji;Steven A Webber;Samuel C Siu

  • Transient limb ischemia induces remote ischemic preconditioning in vivo.

    R.K. Kharbanda;Ulrik Mortensen;P.A. White;S.B. Kristiansen

  • Mechanoelectrical interaction in tetralogy of Fallot. QRS prolongation relates to right ventricular size and predicts malignant ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death.

    Michael A. Gatzoulis;Jan A. Till;Jane Somerville;Andrew N. Redington

  • Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial

    Hans Erik Bøtker;Rajesh Kharbanda;Michael R Schmidt;Morten Bøttcher

  • Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans.

    Michael M.H. Cheung;Rajesh K. Kharbanda;Igor E. Konstantinov;Mikiko Shimizu

  • Management of grown up congenital heart disease.

    John Deanfield;Erik Thaulow;Carol Warnes;Gary Webb

  • Remote Ischemic Conditioning

    Gerd Heusch;Hans Erik Bøtker;Karin Przyklenk;Andrew Redington

  • Tetralogy of Fallot

    Christian Apitz;Gary D Webb;Andrew N Redington

  • Right ventricular diastolic function 15 to 35 years after repair of tetralogy of Fallot : restrictive physiology predicts superior exercise performance

    Michael A. Gatzoulis;Andrew L. Clark;Seamus Cullen;Claus G. H. Newman

  • The remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus modifies inflammatory gene expression in humans

    Igor E. Konstantinov;Sara Arab;Rajesh K. Kharbanda;Jia Li

  • Intermittent peripheral tissue ischemia during coronary ischemia reduces myocardial infarction through a KATP-dependent mechanism: first demonstration of remote ischemic perconditioning

    Michael Rahbek Schmidt;Morten Smerup;Igor E. Konstantinov;Mikiko Shimizu

  • Transient limb ischaemia remotely preconditions through a humoral mechanism acting directly on the myocardium: evidence suggesting cross-species protection.

    Mikiko Shimizu;Michael Tropak;Roberto J. Diaz;Fumiaki Suto

  • Improved long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing remote ischaemic conditioning as an adjunct to primary percutaneous coronary intervention

    Astrid D. Sloth;Michael R. Schmidt;Kim Munk;Rajesh K. Kharbanda;Rajesh K. Kharbanda

  • Ischaemic conditioning and targeting reperfusion injury: a 30 year voyage of discovery.

    Derek J. Hausenloy;Jose A. Barrabes;Hans Erik Bøtker;Sean M. Davidson

  • Right versus left ventricular failure: differences, similarities, and interactions.

    Mark K. Friedberg;Andrew N. Redington

  • Vascular dysfunction after repair of coarctation of the aorta: impact of early surgery.

    M de Divitiis;C Pilla;M Kattenhorn;M Zadinello

  • Characterization of Right Ventricular Diastolic Performance After Complete Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot Restrictive Physiology Predicts Slow Postoperative Recovery

    Seamus Cullen;Darryl Shore;Andrew Redington

  • Exercise capacity after complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot: deleterious effects of residual pulmonary regurgitation.

    J S Carvalho;E A Shinebourne;C Busst;M L Rigby

  • Translation of remote ischaemic preconditioning into clinical practice.

    Rajesh K Kharbanda;Torsten Toftgard Nielsen;Andrew N Redington

  • Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot

    Michael A. Gatzoulis;Seshadri Balaji;Steven A. Webber;Samuel C. Siu

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian W. McCrindle
Brian W. McCrindle University of Toronto
Luc Mertens
Luc Mertens University of Toronto
Lee N. Benson
Lee N. Benson University of Toronto
Hans Erik Bøtker
Hans Erik Bøtker Aarhus University Hospital
Michael A. Gatzoulis
Michael A. Gatzoulis Imperial College London
Andrew Bush
Andrew Bush Imperial College London
John E. Deanfield
John E. Deanfield University College London
Siew Yen Ho
Siew Yen Ho Imperial College London
Robert H. Anderson
Robert H. Anderson Newcastle University
Jeffrey F. Smallhorn
Jeffrey F. Smallhorn University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to many online degrees and flexible career options. Students interested in healthcare management may consider the top online mha programs that are cahme accredited, which offer both prestige and the convenience of virtual learning. For registered nurses wishing to advance their qualifications, there are accessible online rn to bsn programs without clinicals, ideal for those balancing work and study.

Nurses aiming for leadership or advanced clinical roles can take advantage of accelerated options, such as short dnp programs that provide a fast track to higher credentials. If you’re searching for less intensive pathways, the easiest dnp program reddit discussions can help identify supportive and flexible programs.

Whether your interest lies in management or clinical excellence, these online pathways make career advancement in healthcare more achievable than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew N. Redington

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles