World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
12893
World Ranking
11880
National Ranking
750

John W. Lloyd publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Lloyd sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John W. Lloyd D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Lloyd sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering (UK)

Overview

John W. Lloyd is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on engineering and neuroscience. The main academic subfields include biomedical engineering, cognitive neuroscience, control and systems engineering, artificial intelligence, and mechanical engineering.

Their research topics cover a range of specialized areas, including:

  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies
  • Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence

John W. Lloyd's recent published papers feature various contributions to tactile robotics and learning methodologies. Selected papers include:

  • "Optimal Deep Learning for Robot Touch: Training Accurate Pose Models of 3D Surfaces and Edges," 2020, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
  • "Tactile Gym 2.0: Sim-to-Real Deep Reinforcement Learning for Comparing Low-Cost High-Resolution Robot Touch," 2022, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Pose-Based Tactile Servoing: Controlled Soft Touch Using Deep Learning," 2021, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
  • "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Tactile Robotics: Learning to Type on a Braille Keyboard," 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "Bi-Touch: Bimanual Tactile Manipulation With Sim-to-Real Deep Reinforcement Learning," 2023, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Frequent coauthors collaborating with John W. Lloyd include:

  • Nathan F. Lepora
  • Alex Church
  • Yijiong Lin
  • Dandan Zhang
  • Max Yang

Their work has been disseminated through several publication venues where they have multiple contributions:

  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine
  • The International Journal of Robotics Research
  • IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering

In recognition of their professional achievements, John W. Lloyd was named Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering (UK) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • Foundations of logic programming

    John Wylie Lloyd

  • Partial evaluation in logic programming

    J. W. Lloyd;J. C. Shepherdson

  • The Gödel Programming Language

    Patricia Hill;J. W. Lloyd

  • Making prolog more expressive

    John W. Lloyd;Rodney W. Topor

  • Computational Logic — CL 2000

    John Lloyd;Veronica Dahl;Ulrich Furbach;Manfred Kerber

  • Analysis of meta-programs

    P. M. Hill;J. W. Lloyd

  • Kernels and Distances for Structured Data

    Thomas Gärtner;John W. Lloyd;Peter A. Flach

  • Declarative error diagnosis

    J. W. Lloyd

  • Practical Advtanages of Declarative Programming.

    John W. Lloyd

  • Integrity constraint checking in stratified databases

    J. W. Lloyd;E. A. Sonenberg;R. W. Topor

  • A Basis for Deductive Database Systems II

    Unknown

  • Updating knowledge bases

    A. Guessoum;J. W. Lloyd

  • Kernels for Structured Data

    Thomas Gärtner;John W. Lloyd;Peter A. Flach

  • Declarative Programming in Escher

    J. W. Lloyd

  • Completeness of the negation as failure rule

    Joxan Jaffar;Jean-Louis Lassez;John Lloyd

  • Programming in an Integrated Functional and Logic Language.

    John W. Lloyd

  • A Basis for Deductive Database Systems

    Unknown

  • A completeness theorem for SLDNF resolution

    L. Cavedon;J. W. Lloyd

  • From Pixels to Percepts: Highly Robust Edge Perception and Contour Following Using Deep Learning and an Optical Biomimetic Tactile Sensor

    Nathan F. Lepora;Alex Church;Conrad de Kerckhove;Raia Hadsell

  • Logic for Learning

    J. W. Lloyd

  • The Go¨del programming language

    Patricia Hill;John Lloyd

  • Updating knowledge bases II

    A. Guessoum;J. W. Lloyd

Frequent Co-Authors

Raia Hadsell
Raia Hadsell DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Kotagiri Ramamohanarao
Kotagiri Ramamohanarao University of Melbourne
Peter A. Flach
Peter A. Flach University of Bristol
Marcus Hutter
Marcus Hutter DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Christophe Giraud-Carrier
Christophe Giraud-Carrier Brigham Young University
Manuel G. Catalano
Manuel G. Catalano Italian Institute of Technology
Emmanuel J. Favaloro
Emmanuel J. Favaloro Westmead Hospital
Lawrence Cavedon
Lawrence Cavedon RMIT University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens the door to a range of online degree options and flexible career pathways. As education moves increasingly online, students can take advantage of specialized programs tailored to varied interests and career goals.

For those interested in analytics and big data, it's worth considering what is the cheapest data science course in the US? This helps you maximize value and minimize debt while still earning a degree recognized by employers.

If hardware and design spark your interest, pursuing an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering can expand your expertise into robotics, networks, and electronics, complementing a computer science background.

For those eager to enter the job market quickly, numerous quick certifications that pay well are available, many of which focus on in-demand tech skills.

Finally, if fast-tracking your education is a priority, consider one of the quick masters degrees online for advanced knowledge and better career advancement opportunities in just a short time.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Lloyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles