World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
12484
World Ranking
6078
National Ranking
2738

Jack Minker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Minker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 192 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jack Minker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack Minker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - ACM AAAI Allen Newell Award For his fundamental contributions to the fields of deductive databases, logic programming, artificial intelligence, and, more generally, logic-based methods in Computer Science and for his truly unprecedented role in organizing and stimulating scientific discourse.
  • 1994 - ACM Fellow For championing the rights of scientists to practice their profession freely and openly, for bringing to public attention the names of scientists deprived of their scientific freedom and human rights, and for giving these victims hope and making them aware of ACM's support.
  • 1990 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1985 - Outstanding Contribution to ACM Award For championing the rights of scientists to practice their profession freely and openly, for bringing to public attention the names of scientists deprived of their scientific freedom and human rights, and for giving these victims hope and making them aware of ACM's support.

Overview

Jack Minker is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their academic and research career is rooted in the broader field of computer science, with a focus on areas intersecting logic, artificial intelligence, and databases.

Minker's work has significantly engaged with deductive databases, logic programming, and logic-based methods within computer science. Their contributions have spanned artificial intelligence and the application of formal logical systems to computational processes.

Throughout their career, Minker has been recognized with several professional awards, reflecting various aspects of their scientific contributions and service to the scientific community.

  • ACM AAAI Allen Newell Award, 2005: Awarded for fundamental contributions to deductive databases, logic programming, artificial intelligence, and their organizing role in advancing logic-based methods in computer science.
  • ACM Fellow, 1994: Recognized for advocating the rights of scientists to freely practice their profession and supporting scientists deprived of scientific freedom and human rights.
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 1990
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1989
  • Outstanding Contribution to ACM Award, 1985: Given for championing scientists' rights to work openly and for bringing attention to those deprived of scientific freedom and human rights.

The recognition received indicates an active involvement beyond research, highlighting advocacy related to academic freedom and human rights within the scientific community.

There is no publicly available data regarding recent publications, co-authors, or frequent publication venues for Minker, nor specific book publications or detailed enumeration of main topics of their work.

Jack Minker's career demonstrates a sustained role in both advancing computational logic and fostering scientific discourse and professional ethics in computing and artificial intelligence fields.

Best Publications

  • Logic and Databases: A Deductive Approach

    Herve Gallaire;Jack Minker;Jean-Marie Nicolas

  • Logic and Data Bases

    Herve Gallaire;Jack Minker

  • Foundations of deductive databases and logic programming

    J. Minker

  • On Indefinite Data Bases and the Closed World Assumption

    J. Minker

  • On Indefinite Databases and the Closed World Assumption

    Jack Minker

  • Logic-based approach to semantic query optimization

    Upen S. Chakravarthy;John Grant;Jack Minker

  • Foundations of disjunctive logic programming

    Jorge Lobo;Jack Minker;Arcot Rajasekar

  • Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence

    Jack Minker

  • COMBINING KNOWLEDGE BASES CONSISTING OF FIRST‐ORDER THEORIES

    Chitta Baral;Sarit Kraus;Jack Minker;V. S. Subrahmanian

  • An overview of cooperative answering

    Terry Gaasterland;Parke Godfrey;Jack Minker

  • An Analysis of Some Graph Theoretical Cluster Techniques

    J. Gary Augustson;Jack Minker

  • Combining multiple knowledge bases

    C. Baral;S. Kraus;J. Minker

  • The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 3: Sorting and Searching

    Michael T. McClellan;Jack Minker;Donald E. Knuth

  • Weak generalized closed world assumption

    A. Rajasekar;J. Lobo;J. Minker

  • A fixpoint semantics for disjunctive logic programs

    Jack Minker;Arcot Rajasekar

  • Relaxation as a platform for cooperative answering

    Terry Gaasterland;Parke Godfrey;Jack Minker

  • Foundations of semantic query optimization for deductive databases

    U. S. Chakravarthy;J. Grant;J. Minker

  • The impact of logic programming on databases

    John Grant;Jack Minker

  • Multiple Query Processing in Deductive Databases using Query Graphs

    Upen S. Chakravarthy;Jack Minker

  • Logic and Databases: A 20 Year Retrospective

    Jack Minker

  • Advances in Data Base Theory

    Herve Gallaire;Jack Minker;Jean M. Nicholas

Frequent Co-Authors

Chitta Baral
Chitta Baral Arizona State University
V. S. Subrahmanian
V. S. Subrahmanian Dartmouth College
Terry Gaasterland
Terry Gaasterland University of California, San Diego
Simon Kasif
Simon Kasif Boston University
Sarit Kraus
Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
Jorge Lobo
Jorge Lobo Pompeu Fabra University
Carlo Zaniolo
Carlo Zaniolo University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science opens doors to several online degree pathways, each fitting unique goals and timelines. If you're looking for a quick start, discovering what is the easiest associate's degree to get can help you enter the workforce faster, often within two years. These programs are practical for those balancing work, life, or other commitments.

For students seeking to deepen their expertise or unlock higher-level roles, advancing through online affordable master's programs is a cost-effective way to gain specialized knowledge and skills. Many tech professionals also consider transitioning to leadership positions. In this case, earning an advanced credential like the phd organizational leadership or an online educational leadership programs can prepare you for roles influencing educational technology, training, or strategic organizational development.

Assess your current experience and career ambitions to choose the best online program. Each pathway offers flexibility and affordability, making it easier to achieve your goals in Computer Science and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jack Minker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles