World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
8297
World Ranking
8743
National Ranking
239

Piero A. Bonatti publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piero A. Bonatti sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 164 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Piero A. Bonatti D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Piero A. Bonatti sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Piero A. Bonatti is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy. Their research centers around computer science, with a particular focus on artificial intelligence, social sciences, and related subfields including artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, information systems, computer networks and communications, and management science and operations research.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • "Real-time reasoning in OWL2 for GDPR compliance," 2020, published in Artificial Intelligence
  • "Machine Understandable Policies and GDPR Compliance Checking," 2020, published in KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
  • "A false sense of security," 2022, published in Artificial Intelligence
  • "The SPECIAL-K Personal Data Processing Transparency and Compliance Platform," 2020, published in arXiv (Cornell University), with Sabrina Kirrane as primary author
  • "Query answering in circumscribed OWL2 profiles," 2021, published in Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations are:

  • Luigi Sauro (10 joint works)
  • Iliana M. Petrova (8 joint works)
  • Luca Ioffredo (3 joint works)
  • Gianluca Cima (3 joint works)
  • Domenico Lembo (3 joint works)

The scientist's work has been published frequently in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University) - 7 publications
  • Artificial Intelligence - 5 publications
  • KI - Künstliche Intelligenz - 1 publication
  • Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence - 1 publication

The main topics addressed in Piero A. Bonatti's research include:

  • Access Control and Trust
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Cloud Data Security Solutions

The range of their studies reflects a comprehensive engagement with issues at the intersection of artificial intelligence and data privacy, particularly focusing on mechanisms for compliance with regulations such as GDPR and the design of semantic technologies to facilitate transparent and trustworthy data management.

Best Publications

  • TRBAC: a temporal role-based access control model

    Elisa Bertino;Piero Andrea Bonatti;Elena Ferrari

  • TRBAC: A temporal role-based access control model

    Elisa Bertino;Piero Andrea Bonatti;Elena Ferrari

  • An algebra for composing access control policies

    Piero Bonatti;Sabrina De Capitani di Vimercati;Pierangela Samarati

  • Regulating service access and information release on the Web

    Piero Bonatti;Pierangela Samarati

  • A uniform framework for regulating service access and information release on the web

    Piero A. Bonatti;Pierangela Samarati

  • Driving and monitoring provisional trust negotiation with metapolicies

    P. Bonatti;D. Olmedilla

  • On optimal service selection

    P. A. Bonatti;P. Festa

  • The complexity of circumscription in DLs

    Piero A. Bonatti;Carsten Lutz;Frank Wolter

  • Foundations of secure deductive databases

    P.A. Bonatti;S. Kraus;V.S. Subrahmanian

  • Description logics with circumscription

    Piero Bonatti;Carsten Lutz;Frank Wolter

  • The Complexity of Enriched Mu-Calculi

    Piero A. Bonatti;Carsten Lutz;Aniello Murano;Moshe Y. Vardi

  • Knowledge Graphs: New Directions for Knowledge Representation on the Semantic Web (Dagstuhl Seminar 18371)

    Piero Andrea Bonatti;Stefan Decker;Axel Polleres;Valentina Presutti

  • A modular approach to composing access control policies

    Piero Bonatti;Sabrina de Capitani di Vimercati;Pierangela Samarati

  • Reasoning with infinite stable models

    Piero A. Bonatti

  • An Integration of Reputation-based and Policy-based Trust Management

    Piero Bonatti;Claudiu Duma;Daniel Olmedilla;Nahid Shahmehri

  • Controlled query evaluation for enforcing confidentiality in complete information systems

    Joachim Biskup;Piero Bonatti

  • Semantic Web Policies : A Discussion of Requirements and Research Issues

    P. A. Bonatti;C. Duma;N. Fuchs;W. Nejdl

  • Towards an integration of answer set and constraint solving

    S. Baselice;P. A. Bonatti;M. Gelfond

  • Controlled Query Evaluation for Known Policies by Combining Lying and Refusal

    Joachim Biskup;Piero A. Bonatti

  • PeerAccess: a logic for distributed authorization

    Marianne Winslett;Charles C. Zhang;Piero A. Bonatti

  • The complexity of circumscription in description logic

    Piero A. Bonatti;Carsten Lutz;Frank Wolter

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten Lutz
Carsten Lutz Leipzig University
V. S. Subrahmanian
V. S. Subrahmanian Dartmouth College
Pierangela Samarati
Pierangela Samarati University of Milan
Sarit Kraus
Sarit Kraus Bar-Ilan University
Wolfgang Nejdl
Wolfgang Nejdl University of Hannover
Axel Polleres
Axel Polleres Vienna University of Economics and Business
Frank Wolter
Frank Wolter University of Liverpool
Elena Ferrari
Elena Ferrari University of Insubria
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can unlock diverse career pathways within and beyond the field of Computer Science. Many students start with online associate degree programs, which provide essential skills and foundational knowledge in a flexible, quick-to-complete format.

For those aiming to enter academia or senior research roles, affordable phd programs online make it possible to advance your education without the high cost or need to relocate. Similarly, educators seeking to specialize in leadership and administration often consider edd online programs, which are designed for efficient completion on a flexible schedule.

Career flexibility is also enhanced by complementing technical expertise with business knowledge. Pursuing an online business degree with financial aid can help you develop essential management and entrepreneurial skills alongside your computing background.

In summary, online degrees offer cost-effective, accelerated options for different educational goals, making it easier than ever to carve out your ideal career pathway in the US and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Piero A. Bonatti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles