World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
12199
World Ranking
4544
National Ranking
2130

Marianne Winslett publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Winslett sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 354 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marianne Winslett D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marianne Winslett sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - ACM Fellow For contributions to information management and security.

Overview

Marianne Winslett is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans the domain of computer science, with a focus on several subfields including computer networks and communications, computer vision and pattern recognition, information systems, artificial intelligence, and signal processing.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics such as advanced database systems and queries, advanced neural network applications, advanced image and video retrieval techniques, COVID-19 diagnosis using AI, smart grid security and resilience, network security and intrusion detection, and data mining algorithms and applications.

Recent publications by Marianne Winslett include:

  • YOLO-ReT: Towards High Accuracy Real-time Object Detection on Edge GPUs, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
  • Learning-Based Simultaneous Detection and Characterization of Time Delay Attack in Cyber-Physical Systems, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
  • Causal Mechanism Transfer Network for Time Series Domain Adaptation in Mechanical Systems, 2021, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
  • Intelligent Automated Workload Analysis for Database Replatforming, 2022, Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data
  • Goetz Graefe Speaks Out on (Not Only) Query Optimization, 2020, ACM SIGMOD Record

Marianne Winslett frequently publishes in venues such as ACM SIGMOD Record, arXiv (Cornell University), 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, and ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology.

Collaborations feature prominently in Winslett's career, with frequent coauthors including Vanessa Braganholo, Yao Chen, Deming Chen, Prakhar Ganesh, and Xin Lou.

In recognition of their contributions to the field of computer science, Winslett was named an ACM Fellow in 2006, cited specifically for contributions to information management and security.

Best Publications

  • Reasoning about action using a possible models approach

    Marianne Winslett

  • Functional mechanism: regression analysis under differential privacy

    Jun Zhang;Zhenjie Zhang;Xiaokui Xiao;Yin Yang

  • Supporting structured credentials and sensitive policies through interoperable strategies for automated trust negotiation

    Ting Yu;Marianne Winslett;Kent E. Seamons

  • Updating Logical Databases

    Marianne Winslett

  • Differentially private histogram publication

    Jia Xu;Zhenjie Zhang;Xiaokui Xiao;Yin Yang

  • Preventing history forgery with secure provenance

    Ragib Hasan;Radu Sion;Marianne Winslett

  • Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management

    Ee-Peng Lim;Marianne Winslett;Mark Sanderson;Ada Fu

  • Negotiating trust in the Web

    M. Winslett;T. Yu;K.E. Seamons;A. Hess

  • Server-Directed Collective I/O in Panda

    K. E. Seamons;Y. Chen;P. Jones;J. Jozwiak

  • Scientific and Statistical Database Management

    Marianne Winslett

  • A unified scheme for resource protection in automated trust negotiation

    Ting Yu;M. Winslett

  • The case of the fake Picasso: preventing history forgery with secure provenance

    Ragib Hasan;Radu Sion;Marianne Winslett

  • Limiting the Disclosure of Access Control Policies during Automated Trust Negotiation.

    Kent E. Seamons;Marianne Winslett;Ting Yu

  • Interoperable strategies in automated trust negotiation

    Ting Yu;Marianne Winslett;Kent E. Seamons

  • Requirements for policy languages for trust negotiation

    K.E. Seamons;M. Winslett;Ting Yu;B. Smith

  • Introducing secure provenance: problems and challenges

    Ragib Hasan;Radu Sion;Marianne Winslett

  • PRUNES: an efficient and complete strategy for automated trust negotiation over the Internet

    Ting Yu;Xiaosong Ma;Marianne Winslett

  • No Registration Needed: How to Use Declarative Policies and Negotiation to Access Sensitive Resources on the Semantic Web

    Rita Gavriloaie;Wolfgang Nejdl;Daniel Olmedilla;Kent E. Seamons

  • PeerTrust: Automated Trust Negotiation for Peers on the Semantic Web

    Wolfgang Nejdl;Daniel Olmedilla;Marianne Winslett

  • Differentially private data cubes: optimizing noise sources and consistency

    Bolin Ding;Marianne Winslett;Jiawei Han;Zhenhui Li

  • Differentially Private Histogram Publication

    Jia Xu;Zhenjie Zhang;Xiaokui Xiao;Yin Yang

Frequent Co-Authors

Yin Yang
Yin Yang Hamad bin Khalifa University
Ting Yu
Ting Yu Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Ragib Hasan
Ragib Hasan University of Alabama at Birmingham
Xiaokui Xiao
Xiaokui Xiao National University of Singapore
Radu Sion
Radu Sion Stony Brook University
Wolfgang Nejdl
Wolfgang Nejdl University of Hannover
Sy-Yen Kuo
Sy-Yen Kuo National Taiwan University
Deming Chen
Deming Chen University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Richard T. Snodgrass
Richard T. Snodgrass University of Arizona
David K. Y. Yau
David K. Y. Yau Singapore University of Technology and Design

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, you might also be interested in a variety of related online degrees and future career pathways. Many students now explore flexible educational options, making online programs increasingly popular.

For those seeking cost-effective education beyond a bachelor’s, there are several affordable master's degrees online that can deepen your knowledge and enhance your job prospects. If you’re interested in leadership roles or academia, an online doctorate in organizational leadership can help you gain strategic skills highly valued across tech industries.

Those seeking a quicker route to entry-level roles in technology may consider associates degrees related to computer science. These programs are often the fastest way to launch a tech career or transition into more advanced studies.

Notable institutions like the university of north georgia offer a range of online degree pathways, making it easier to balance education with work and other commitments. Exploring these options can open up diverse opportunities in the fast-changing technology sector.

Best Scientists Citing Marianne Winslett

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles