World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maurice Bruynooghe

Maurice Bruynooghe

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
8058
World Ranking
5961
National Ranking
64

Maurice Bruynooghe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurice Bruynooghe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 310 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maurice Bruynooghe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurice Bruynooghe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maurice Bruynooghe is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and specializes in the field of Computer Science, with a primary focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans multiple subfields including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software, Automotive Engineering, and Hardware and Architecture.

The key topics of Maurice Bruynooghe's research involve Logic, programming, and type systems; Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge; Formal Methods in Verification; Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation; Software Testing and Debugging Techniques; Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques; and Semantic Web and Ontologies.

They have published several recent papers across diverse venues, including:

  • "Using Symmetries to Lift Satisfiability Checking," 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Using Symmetries to Lift Satisfiability Checking," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Justifications and a Reconstruction of Parity Game Solving Algorithms," 2023, Lecture notes in computer science
  • "Analyzing Semantics of Aggregate Answer Set Programming Using Approximation Fixpoint Theory," 2022, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • "An Automatic Verification Technique for Loop and Data Reuse Transformations based on Geometric Modeling of Programs," 2020, Lirias (KU Leuven)

Their scholarly contributions are published mainly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Lirias (KU Leuven), and Lecture notes in computer science.

Maurice Bruynooghe frequently collaborates with several researchers including Marc Denecker, Linde Vanbesien, Ruben Lapauw, Pierre Carbonnelle, and Gottfried Schenner, with the highest number of coauthored works being with Marc Denecker.

Best Publications

  • A practical framework for the abstract interpretation of logic programs

    Maurice Bruynooghe

  • Logic programs with annotated disjunctions

    Joost Vennekens;Sofie Verbaeten;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • Counting Integer Points in Parametric Polytopes Using Barvinok's Rational Functions

    Sven Verdoolaege;Rachid Seghir;Kristof Beyls;Vincent Loechner

  • Deriving descriptions of possible values of program variables by means of abstract interpretation

    G. Janssens;M. Bruynooghe

  • A theory of clausal discovery

    Luc De Raedt;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • Deduction revision by intelligent backtracking

    Maurice Bruynooghe;Luís Moniz Pereira

  • Well-founded and stable semantics of logic programs with aggregates

    Nikolay Pelov;Marc Denecker;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • Machine learning techniques to examine large patient databases.

    Geert Meyfroidt;Fabian Güiza;Jan Ramon;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • Abstract interpretation: towards the global optimisation of PROLOG programs

    Maurice Bruynooghe;Gerda Janssens;Allain Callebaut;Bart Demoen

  • Improving abstract interpretations by combining domains

    Michael Codish;Anne Mulkers;Maurice Bruynooghe;Maria García de la Banda

  • Cp-logic: A language of causal probabilistic events and its relation to logic programming

    Joost Vennekens;Marc Denecker;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • An instance of abstract interpretation integrating type and mode inferencing

    Maurice Bruynooghe;Gerda Janssens

  • The memory management of PROLOG implementations

    Maurice Bruynooghe

  • Hierarchical multi-classification

    Hendrik Blockeel;Maurice Bruynooghe;Sašo Džeroski;Jan Ramon

  • Solving combinatorial search problems by intelligent backtracking

    Maurice Bruynooghe

  • A polynomial time computable metric between point sets

    Jan Ramon;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • Mining data from intensive care patients

    Jan Ramon;Daan Fierens;Fabián Güiza;Geert Meyfroidt

  • Temporal reasoning with abductive event calculus

    Marc Denecker;Lode Missiaen;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • The derivation of an algorithm for program specialisation

    John Gallagher;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • Logic program specialisation through partial deduction: Control issues

    Michael Leuschel;Maurice Bruynooghe

Frequent Co-Authors

Marc Denecker
Marc Denecker KU Leuven
Luc De Raedt
Luc De Raedt KU Leuven
Jan Ramon
Jan Ramon French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Michael Codish
Michael Codish Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Manuel V. Hermenegildo
Manuel V. Hermenegildo Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Jan Van den Bussche
Jan Van den Bussche Hasselt University
Michael Leuschel
Michael Leuschel Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up many dynamic pathways. Online education now makes it easier than ever to enhance your skills or pivot into specialized tech careers. For those interested in data-driven roles, consider an online data science masters. These programs provide in-depth knowledge in analytics, AI, and machine learning—fields highly sought after by employers.

Not all computer science graduates follow the same route. If you’re interested in combining tech with management, an most affordable online mba can help you build valuable leadership and business skills. Alternatively, tech-savvy individuals interested in the built environment might pursue an online construction management degree, which blends technical knowledge with project management essentials.

Time is also a factor for many professionals. Some are now opting for 1 year master programs to quickly acquire advanced credentials. Whether you’re seeking a new specialty or aiming to advance your career, online degrees offer flexibility, affordability, and a broad range of interdisciplinary possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Maurice Bruynooghe

Trending Scientists