World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6132
World Ranking
10234
National Ranking
512

Michael Leuschel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Leuschel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 286 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Leuschel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Leuschel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Leuschel is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a substantive focus on Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Artificial Intelligence. Other areas of work include Neurology and Information Systems.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas within software engineering and formal methods, including:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Frequent collaborators in Michael Leuschel's work include:

  • Joshua Schmidt
  • Fabian Vu
  • Sophia Reinhardt
  • Atif Mashkoor
  • Christiane Schüle

They have published in several notable venues, with multiple publications appearing in:

  • Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Selected recent papers by Michael Leuschel include:

  • Validation and real-life demonstration of ETCS hybrid level 3 principles using a formal B model, 2020, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • Fifty Years of Prolog and Beyond, 2022, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming
  • Formal Methods in Industry, 2024, Formal Aspects of Computing
  • VertiGo - a pilot project in nystagmus detection via webcam, 2020, Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering
  • Integrating formal specifications into applications: the ProB Java API, 2020, Formal Methods in System Design

Best Publications

  • ProB: A Model Checker for B

    Michael Leuschel;Michael J. Butler

  • ProB : an automated analysis toolset for the B method

    Michael Leuschel;Michael Butler

  • Combining CSP and b for specification and property verification

    Michael Butler;Michael Leuschel

  • Infinite State Model Checking by Abstract Interpretation and Program Specialisation

    Michael Leuschel;Thierry Massart

  • Controlling generalization and polyvariance in partial deduction of normal logic programs

    Michael Leuschel;Bern Martens;Danny De Schreye

  • CONJUNCTIVE PARTIAL DEDUCTION: FOUNDATIONS, CONTROL, ALGORITHMS, AND EXPERIMENTS

    Danny De Schreye;Robert Glück;Jesper Jørgensen;Michael Leuschel

  • Logic program specialisation through partial deduction: Control issues

    Michael Leuschel;Maurice Bruynooghe

  • On the Power of Homeomorphic Embedding for Online Termination

    Michael Leuschel;Michael Leuschel;Michael Leuschel

  • Abstract State Machines, Alloy, B, VDM, and Z

    John Derrick;John Fitzgerald;Stefania Gnesi;Sarfraz Khurshid

  • A Conceptual Embedding of Folding into Partial Deduction: Towards a Maximal Integration

    Michael Leuschel;Danny De Schreye;D André de Waal

  • Validating Z specifications using the PROB animator and model checker

    Daniel Plagge;Michael Leuschel

  • Homeomorphic embedding for online termination of symbolic methods

    Michael Leuschel

  • Global Control for Partial Deduction through Characteristic Atoms and Global Trees

    Michael Leuschel;Bern Martens

  • Redundant Argument Filtering of Logic Programs

    Michael Leuschel;Morten Heine Sørensen

  • How to Make FDR Spin LTL Model Checking of CSP by Refinement

    Michael Leuschel;Thierry Massart;Andrew Currie

  • Visualising Event-B Models with B-Motion Studio

    Lukas Ladenberger;Jens Bendisposto;Michael Leuschel

  • Automated property verification for large scale B models with ProB

    Michael Leuschel;Jérôme Falampin;Fabian Fritz;Daniel Plagge

  • Allocation removal by partial evaluation in a tracing JIT

    Carl Friedrich Bolz;Antonio Cuni;Maciej FijaBkowski;Michael Leuschel

  • Seven at one stroke: LTL model checking for high-level specifications in B, Z, CSP, and more

    Daniel Plagge;Michael Leuschel

  • Formal Methods for Components and Objects - 8th International Symposium, FMCO 2009, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, November 4-6, 2009. Revised Selected Papers

    Unknown

  • Seven at one stroke: LTL model checking for High-level Specifications in B, Z, CSP, and more.

    Michael Leuschel;Daniel Plagge

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Butler
Michael Butler University of Southampton
Andreas Podelski
Andreas Podelski University of Freiburg
C. R. Ramakrishnan
C. R. Ramakrishnan Stony Brook University
Alexander Romanovsky
Alexander Romanovsky Newcastle University
Jaco van de Pol
Jaco van de Pol Aarhus University
Juan Carlos Augusto
Juan Carlos Augusto Middlesex University
Robert Glück
Robert Glück University of Copenhagen
Pieter H. Hartel
Pieter H. Hartel Delft University of Technology
Bashir M. Al-Hashimi
Bashir M. Al-Hashimi King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide array of online degree options and interdisciplinary career pathways. For those interested in fast-tracking their education, a 2-year computer science degree online offers a convenient path into the tech workforce or further studies.

Many students choose to pair computer science with related fields such as engineering or environmental science. Curious about how technology and sustainability intersect? Explore potential roles and academic pathways at what can you get with an environmental science degree.

If you’re considering engineering, there are affordable programs in both environmental and mechanical disciplines. Investigate your options with a focus on real-world applications at environmental engineering degree, or look at program pricing and structure for distance learners at mechanical engineering degree online cost.

Whether you aim to specialize or broaden your knowledge, these online degrees can help you build a customized career path that fits the evolving demands of today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Leuschel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles