World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
3690
World Ranking
12793
National Ranking
196

Michael Codish publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Codish sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 128 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Codish D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Codish sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Codish is affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel. Their research is focused on several fields within computer science, with significant contributions in computational theory and mathematics, computer networks and communications, artificial intelligence, software, and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

Their main research topics include:

  • Advanced Graph Theory Research
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods

Michael Codish's recent scholarly works are published primarily in prestigious venues such as the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, arXiv (Cornell University), and Constraints. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Compiling Model-Based Diagnosis to Boolean Satisfaction," 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Incremental Symmetry Breaking Constraints for Graph Search Problems," 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "SAT-Based Techniques for Lexicographically Smallest Finite Models," 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Complete symmetry breaking constraints for the class of uniquely Hamiltonian graphs," 2022, Constraints
  • "Breaking Symmetries from a Set-Covering Perspective," 2025, arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Mikoláš Janota, Avraham Itzhakov, João Araüjo, Marek Dančo, and Amit Metodi. These collaborations have contributed to multiple publications and advances across their research fields.

Michael Codish's research activity reflects a significant focus on applying and developing theoretical aspects of graph theory and constraint optimization, alongside a broad engagement with algorithmic and software engineering challenges. Their work involves a combination of formal methods and practical techniques for model-driven engineering and vehicle routing optimization.

Best Publications

  • Propagation via lazy clause generation

    Olga Ohrimenko;Peter J. Stuckey;Michael Codish

  • A semantic basis for the termination analysis of logic programs

    Michael Codish;Cohavit Taboch

  • Improving abstract interpretations by combining domains

    Michael Codish;Anne Mulkers;Maurice Bruynooghe;Maria García de la Banda

  • Analyzing logic programs using “prop”-ositional logic programs and a magic wand

    Michael Codish;Bart Demoen

  • Suspension analyses for concurrent logic programs

    Michael Codish;Moreno Falaschi;Kim Marriott

  • Compositional analysis of modular logic programs

    Michael Codish;Saumya K. Debray;Roberto Giacobazzi

  • Propagation = lazy clause generation

    Olga Ohrimenko;Peter J. Stuckey;Michael Codish

  • Bottom-up abstract interpretation of logic programs

    Michael Codish;Dennis Dams;Eyal Yardeni

  • Termination analysis of logic programs through combination of type-based norms

    Maurice Bruynooghe;Michael Codish;John P. Gallagher;Samir Genaim

  • A novel SAT-based approach to model based diagnosis

    Amit Metodi;Roni Stern;Meir Kalech;Michael Codish

  • Specialisation of Prolog and FCP programs using abstract interpretation

    J. Gallagher;M. Codish;E. Shapiro

  • Deriving polymorphic type dependencies for logic programs using multiple incarnations of Prop

    Michael Codish;Bart Demoen

  • Termination Analysis of Java Bytecode

    Elvira Albert;Puri Arenas;Michael Codish;Samir Genaim

  • Derivation and Safety of an Abstract Unification Algorithm for Groundness and Aliasing Analysis.

    Michael Codish;Dennis Dams;Eyal Yardeni

  • Type dependencies for logic programs using ACI-unification

    Michael Codish;Vitaly Lagoon

  • Fully abstract denotational semantics for flat Concurrent Prolog

    R. Gerth;M. Codish;Y. Lichtenstein;E. Shapiro

  • Pairwise cardinality networks

    Michael Codish;Moshe Zazon-Ivry

  • Analysing logic programs using “prop”-ositional logic programs and a magic wand

    Michael Codish;Bart Demoen

  • Testing for termination with monotonicity constraints

    Michael Codish;Vitaly Lagoon;Peter J. Stuckey

  • Solving Partial Order Constraints for LPO Termination

    Michael Codish;Vitaly Lagoon;Peter J. Stuckey

  • Improving abstract interpretations by combining domains

    M. Codish;A. Mulkers;M. Bruynooghe;M. García de la Banda

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. Stuckey
Peter J. Stuckey Monash University
Jürgen Giesl
Jürgen Giesl RWTH Aachen University
Ehud Shapiro
Ehud Shapiro Weizmann Institute of Science
Kim Marriott
Kim Marriott Monash University
Manuel V. Hermenegildo
Manuel V. Hermenegildo Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies
Michael J. Maher
Michael J. Maher University of New South Wales
Roni Stern
Roni Stern Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Saumya K. Debray
Saumya K. Debray University of Arizona
Aart Middeldorp
Aart Middeldorp University of Innsbruck

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of connected fields and flexible study routes. With the increasing popularity of online education, prospective students can now access specialized programs that align with their interests and budgets.

For those interested in engineering, understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education is crucial when considering an online degree. Similarly, students looking into physics can find flexible study options by investigating a bachelor of science in physics online. These programs can be both affordable and highly respected.

Data science is another fast-growing pathway that intersects with computer science. Choosing from a wide selection of data science degrees helps students develop in-demand skills for tech-driven industries.

For those seeking advanced study, an online master’s in electrical engineering degree can lead to high-paying career opportunities and leadership roles in technology sectors.

No matter your chosen path, online programs offer accessibility, flexibility, and a range of specializations—making them a solid option for aspiring tech professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Codish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles