World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter M. Lafleur

Peter M. Lafleur

Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Canada
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
63
Citations
14966
World Ranking
2463
National Ranking
101

Peter M. Lafleur publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Lafleur sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter M. Lafleur D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Lafleur sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Peter M. Lafleur is affiliated with Trent University in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong emphasis on Atmospheric Science, Ecology, and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work covers multiple interconnected topics, including climate change and permafrost, peatlands and wetlands ecology, cryospheric studies and observations, geology and paleoclimatology research, botany and plant ecology studies, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics.

Peter M. Lafleur has an extensive publication record, having contributed to various venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Global Change Biology, Environmental Research Letters, Biogeosciences, and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Lafleur include:

  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties, 2021, Global Change Biology
  • Shallow soils are warmer under trees and tall shrubs across Arctic and Boreal ecosystems, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • Pan-Arctic soil moisture control on tundra carbon sequestration and plant productivity, 2022, Global Change Biology
  • Patterns and drivers of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in Southern China's grasslands, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Earlier snowmelt may lead to late season declines in plant productivity and carbon sequestration in Arctic tundra ecosystems, 2022, Scientific Reports

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Notable co-authors include Elyn Humphreys, Oliver Sonnentag, Donatella Zona, E. S. Euskirchen, and Jennifer D. Watts.

Best Publications

  • Vulnerability of Permafrost Carbon to Climate Change: Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle

    Edward A. G. Schuur;James Bockheim;Josep G. Canadell;Eugenie Euskirchen

  • Contemporary carbon balance and late Holocene carbon accumulation in a northern peatland

    Nigel T. Roulet;Peter M. Lafleur;Pierre J. H. Richard;Pierre J. H. Richard;Tim R. Moore

  • Plant biomass and production and CO2 exchange in an ombrotrophic bog

    Tim R. Moore;Jill L. Bubier;Steve E. Frolking;Peter M. Lafleur

  • Interannual variability in the peatland-atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange at an ombrotrophic bog

    Peter M. Lafleur;Nigel T. Roulet;Jill L. Bubier;Steve Frolking

  • Northern fens: methane flux and climatic change

    Nigel Roulet;Tim Moore;Jill Bubier;Peter Lafleur

  • An assessment of the carbon balance of Arctic tundra: comparisons among observations, process models, and atmospheric inversions

    A. D. McGuire;Torben Christensen;D. Hayes;Arnaud Heroult

  • Spatial and Temporal Variability in Growing-Season Net Ecosystem Carbon Dioxide Exchange at a Large Peatland in Ontario, Canada

    Jill L. Bubier;Gaytri Bhatia;Tim R. Moore;Nigel T. Roulet

  • Ecosystem Respiration in a Cool Temperate Bog Depends on Peat Temperature But Not Water Table

    P M Lafleur;Tim R. Moore;Nigel T Roulet;Steve Frolking

  • How climate and vegetation type influence evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in Canadian forest, peatland and grassland ecosystems

    Christian Brümmer;T. Andrew Black;Rachhpal S. Jassal;Nicholas J. Grant

  • A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

    Christopher R. Schwalm;Christopher A. Williams;Kevin Schaefer;Ryan S. Anderson

  • Variability in exchange of CO2 across 12 northern peatland and tundra sites

    Magnus Lund;Peter M. Lafleur;Nigel T. Roulet;Anders Lindroth

  • Annual cycle of CO2 exchange at a bog peatland

    P. M. Lafleur;N. T. Roulet;S. W. Admiral

  • Annual and seasonal variability in evapotranspiration and water table at a shrub-covered bog in southern Ontario, Canada

    Peter M. Lafleur;Robbie A. Hember;Stuart W. Admiral;Nigel T. Roulet

  • Relationship between ecosystem productivity and photosynthetically active radiation for northern peatlands

    S. E. Frolking;J. L. Bubier;T. R. Moore;T. Ball

  • Modeling seasonal to annual carbon balance of Mer Bleue Bog, Ontario, Canada

    Steve Frolking;Nigel T. Roulet;Tim R. Moore;Peter M. Lafleur

  • Land surface phenology derived from normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at global FLUXNET sites

    Chaoyang Wu;Dailiang Peng;Kamel Soudani;Lukas Siebicke

  • Seasonal trends in energy, water, and carbon dioxide fluxes at a northern boreal wetland

    Peter M. Lafleur;J. Harry McCaughey;David W. Joiner;Paul A. Bartlett

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • Spring warming and carbon dioxide exchange over low Arctic tundra in central Canada

    Peter M. Lafleur;Elyn R. Humphreys

  • Statistical upscaling of ecosystem CO2 fluxes across the terrestrial tundra and boreal domain: Regional patterns and uncertainties

    Anna Maria Virkkala;Juha Aalto;Juha Aalto;Brendan M. Rogers;Torbern Tagesson;Torbern Tagesson

  • An assessment of the carbon balance of Arctic tundra: Comparisons among observations, process models, and atmospheric inversions

    A. D. McGuire;T. R. Christensen;D. J. Hayes;A. Heroult

Frequent Co-Authors

Elyn R. Humphreys
Elyn R. Humphreys Carleton University
Nigel T. Roulet
Nigel T. Roulet McGill University
Tim R. Moore
Tim R. Moore McGill University
Lawrence B. Flanagan
Lawrence B. Flanagan University of Lethbridge
Walter C. Oechel
Walter C. Oechel San Diego State University
Steve Frolking
Steve Frolking University of New Hampshire
Robert F. Grant
Robert F. Grant University of Alberta
Alan G. Barr
Alan G. Barr University of Saskatchewan
Hank A. Margolis
Hank A. Margolis National Aeronautics and Space Administration
M. Altaf Arain
M. Altaf Arain McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Programs such as online edd programs no dissertation offer a flexible route for professionals aiming to deepen their knowledge without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Additionally, students seeking leadership roles might consider transitioning through online eds to edd programs, which provide a streamlined path from a master's to a doctorate, enhancing qualifications for higher-level positions.

For those interested in community and social aspects of environmental work, fully funded dsw programs can be a valuable option, combining social work principles with environmental advocacy.

Moreover, individuals beginning their educational journey may find affordable and flexible options like an online general studies bachelor degree cheap to be a practical choice, laying a broad academic foundation before specializing in Environmental Sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Lafleur

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles