World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
6661
World Ranking
7145
National Ranking
2548

Scott W. Bailey publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott W. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 139 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Scott W. Bailey D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott W. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott W. Bailey is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States and has contributed extensively to environmental science research, particularly focusing on soil and water systems. Their work encompasses a variety of interconnected fields and topics that address the dynamics of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

The main field of study for Scott W. Bailey is Environmental Science, where they have published 41 works. Subfields include Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Soil Science, and Atmospheric Science. This diverse expertise reflects a broad approach to understanding environmental processes and challenges.

Their research topics span several specialized areas including:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Heavy metals in environment
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Clay minerals and soil interactions

Scott W. Bailey has collaborated frequently with researchers such as K. J. McGuire, Donald S. Ross, Jennifer A. Bower, Mark B. Green, and Madeline E. Schreiber. These collaborations likely support interdisciplinary studies often necessary in environmental science research.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on soil chemistry, watershed dynamics, and the use of technological methods like machine learning in environmental monitoring. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Reversal of Forest Soil Acidification in the Northeastern United States and Eastern Canada: Site and Soil Factors Contributing to Recovery," 2020, Soil Systems
  • "Organo-mineral interactions and soil carbon mineralizability with variable saturation cycle frequency," 2020, Geoderma
  • "Predicting high-frequency variation in stream solute concentrations with water quality sensors and machine learning," 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • "Watershed studies at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: Building on a long legacy of research with new approaches and sources of data," 2020, Hydrological Processes
  • "A catchment water balance assessment of an abrupt shift in evapotranspiration at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USA," 2021, Hydrological Processes

The venues where Scott W. Bailey has frequently published include:

  • Geoderma
  • Hydrological Processes
  • Soil Systems
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal

Best Publications

  • The biogeochemistry of calcium at Hubbard Brook

    G.E. Likens;C.T. Driscoll;D.C. Buso;T.G. Siccama

  • Factors associated with the decline disease of sugar maple on the Allegheny Plateau

    Stephen B. Horsley;Robert P. Long;Scott W. Bailey;Richard A. Hallett

  • Calcium inputs and transport in a base-poor forest ecosystem as interpreted by Sr isotopes

    Scott W. Bailey;James W. Hornbeck;Charles T. Driscoll;Henri E. Gaudette

  • The biogeochemistry of sulfur at Hubbard Brook

    Gene E. Likens;Charles T. Driscoll;Donald C. Buso;Myron J. Mitchell

  • Sulphate, Nitrogen and Base Cation Budgets at 21 Forested Catchments in Canada, the United States and Europe

    Shaun A. Watmough;Julian Aherne;Christine Alewell;Paul Arp

  • Health of Eastern North American Sugar Maple Forests and Factors Affecting Decline

    Stephen B. Horsley;Robert P. Long;Scott W. Bailey;Richard A. Hallett

  • Declining Acidic Deposition Begins Reversal of Forest-Soil Acidification in the Northeastern U.S. and Eastern Canada.

    Gregory B. Lawrence;Paul W. Hazlett;Ivan J. Fernandez;Rock Ouimet

  • Thirty Years of Change in Forest Soils of the Allegheny Plateau, Pennsylvania

    S. W. Bailey;S. B. Horsley;R. P. Long

  • Influence of Edaphic Factors on Sugar Maple Nutrition and Health on the Allegheny Plateau

    S. W. Bailey;S. B. Horsley;R. P. Long;R. A. Hallett

  • Deforestation causes increased dissolved silicate losses in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest

    Daniel J. Conley;Gene E. Likens;Donald C. Buso;Loredana Saccone

  • Streamwater chemistry and nutrient budgets for forested watersheds in New England: variability and management implications

    J.W Hornbeck;S.W Bailey;D.C Buso;J.B Shanley

  • Network analysis reveals multiscale controls on streamwater chemistry

    Kevin J. McGuire;Christian E. Torgersen;Gene E. Likens;Gene E. Likens;Donald C. Buso

  • Sugar maple growth in relation to nutrition and stress in the northeastern United States

    Robert P. Long;Stephen B. Horsley;Richard A. Hallett;Scott W. Bailey

  • The biogeochemistry of chlorine at Hubbard Brook, New Hampshire, USA.

    Gary M. Lovett;Gene E. Likens;Donald C. Buso;Charles T. Driscoll

  • IMPLICATIONS OF SODIUM MASS BALANCE FOR INTERPRETING THE CALCIUM CYCLE OF A FORESTED ECOSYSTEM

    Scott W. Bailey;Donald C. Buso;Gene E. Likens

  • Associations of calcium and aluminum with the growth and health of sugar maple trees in Vermont

    Paul G. Schaberg;James W. Tilley;Gary J. Hawley;Donald H. DeHayes

  • Assessment of soil calcium status in red spruce forests in the northeastern United States

    Gregory B. Lawrence;Mark B. David;Scott W. Bailey;Walter C. Shortle

  • Effects of Acidic Deposition and Soil Acidification on Sugar Maple Trees in the Adirondack Mountains, New York

    Timothy J. Sullivan;Gregory B. Lawrence;Scott W. Bailey;Todd C. McDonnell

  • Linking water age and solute dynamics in streamflow at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH, USA

    Paolo Benettin;Scott W. Bailey;John L. Campbell;Mark B. Green;Mark B. Green

  • Fine scale variations of surface water chemistry in an ephemeral to perennial drainage network

    Margaret A. Zimmer;Margaret A. Zimmer;Scott W. Bailey;Kevin J. McGuire;Thomas D. Bullen

  • Identifying calcium sources at an acid deposition- impacted spruce forest: a strontium isotope, alkaline earth element multi-tracer approach

    Thomas D. Bullen;Scott W. Bailey

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin J. McGuire
Kevin J. McGuire Virginia Tech
Gregory B. Lawrence
Gregory B. Lawrence United States Geological Survey
Gene E. Likens
Gene E. Likens University of Connecticut
Charles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll Syracuse University
James W. Hornbeck
James W. Hornbeck US Forest Service
Myron J. Mitchell
Myron J. Mitchell SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
James B. Shanley
James B. Shanley United States Geological Survey
Ivan J. Fernandez
Ivan J. Fernandez University of Maine
Chris E. Johnson
Chris E. Johnson Syracuse University
Thomas D. Bullen
Thomas D. Bullen United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Programs like a 1 year mpa online offer a fast-track into public administration, perfect for those aiming to influence environmental policy and management.

Additionally, pursuing a best online bachelor degree in sociology can deepen your understanding of societal impacts on the environment, enhancing skills in community engagement and social research.

For professionals considering further advancement, online education degrees such as an edd without dissertation allow for flexible learning paths that focus on practical expertise rather than lengthy research projects.

Exploring accredited eds to edd programs also ensures that advanced education credentials are recognized and respected, vital for leadership roles within environmental education and advocacy sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Scott W. Bailey

Trending Scientists