World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5886
World Ranking
13439
National Ranking
5375

Douglas Sicker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas Sicker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 221 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Douglas Sicker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas Sicker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas Sicker is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and has a significant body of work primarily in the field of Engineering. Their research spans several subfields including Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, Media Technology, Information Systems, and Control and Systems Engineering.

Their recent publications cover a variety of topics and venues, demonstrating a focus on technological advancements and policy implications. Notable papers include:

  • "Blockchain Integration With Digital Technology and the Future of Health Care Ecosystems: Systematic Review" (2021) in the Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "THz Communications - a Boon and/or Bane for Security, Privacy, and National Security" (2020) in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Enhancing NOMA Backscatter IoT Communications With RIS" (2023) in IEEE Internet of Things Journal
  • "Current Status and Future Perspectives on the Internet of Things in Oncology" (2021) in Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy
  • "When Being Connected is not Enough: An Analysis of the Second and Third Levels of the Digital Divide in a Developing Country" (2021) in Journal of Information Policy

Douglas Sicker frequently collaborates with several co-authors including Erezi Ogbo, Tim Brown, Jon Gant, Rohit Singh, and Shahrukh K. Hashmi.

Their work is published across various venues with repeated contributions to the following journals and platforms:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Information Policy
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Main research topics addressed by Sicker include ICT Impact and Policies, Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization, Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks, Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling, Social Media and Politics, Technology Adoption and User Behaviour, and Smart Grid Security and Resilience.

  • ICT Impact and Policies
  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
  • Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Smart Grid Security and Resilience

Douglas Sicker's academic contributions reflect a multidisciplinary approach integrating engineering principles, communications technology, and policy analysis, particularly in emerging areas such as digital health ecosystems, IoT communications, and security concerns related to new communication technologies.

Best Publications

  • Low-resource routing attacks against tor

    Kevin Bauer;Damon McCoy;Dirk Grunwald;Tadayoshi Kohno

  • Shining Light in Dark Places: Understanding the Tor Network

    Damon Mccoy;Kevin Bauer;Dirk Grunwald;Tadayoshi Kohno

  • A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters

    Leysia Palen;Kenneth M. Anderson;Gloria Mark;James Martin

  • A Survey of Wireless Path Loss Prediction and Coverage Mapping Methods

    C. Phillips;D. Sicker;D. Grunwald

  • Passive data link layer 802.11 wireless device driver fingerprinting

    Jason Franklin;Damon McCoy;Parisa Tabriz;Vicentiu Neagoe

  • Terahertz-Enabled Wireless System for Beyond-5G Ultra-Fast Networks: A Brief Survey

    Kazi Mohammed Saidul Huq;Sherif Adeshina Busari;Jonathan Rodriguez;Valerio Frascolla

  • On the Application of Blockchains to Spectrum Management

    Martin B. H. Weiss;Kevin Werbach;Douglas C. Sicker;Carlos E. Caicedo Bastidas

  • MultiMAC - an adaptive MAC framework for dynamic radio networking

    C. Doerr;M. Neufeld;J. Fifield;T. Weingart

  • MOJO: a distributed physical layer anomaly detection system for 802.11 WLANs

    Anmol Sheth;Christian Doerr;Dirk Grunwald;Richard Han

  • Practical radio environment mapping with geostatistics

    Caleb Phillips;Michael Ton;Douglas Sicker;Dirk Grunwald

  • Legal issues surrounding monitoring during network research

    Douglas C. Sicker;Paul Ohm;Dirk Grunwald

  • Towards 5G: Scenario-based assessment of the future supply and demand for mobile telecommunications infrastructure

    Edward Oughton;Zoraida Frias;Tom Russell;Douglas Sicker

  • Selective encryption for consumer applications

    T. Lookabaugh;D.C. Sicker

  • Bounding the error of path loss models

    Caleb Phillips;Douglas Sicker;Dirk Grunwald

  • Generalized Hybrid Beamforming for Vehicular Connectivity Using THz Massive MIMO

    Sherif Adeshina Busari;Kazi Mohammed Saidul Huq;Shahid Mumtaz;Jonathan Rodriguez

  • SMACK: a SMart ACKnowledgment scheme for broadcast messages in wireless networks

    Aveek Dutta;Dola Saha;Dirk Grunwald;Douglas Sicker

  • Assessing the Effectiveness of Remote Networking Laboratories

    D.C. Sicker;T. Lookabaugh;J. Santos;F. Barnes

  • Cybersecurity education in a developing nation: the Ecuadorian environment

    Frankie E. Catota;Frankie E. Catota;M. Granger Morgan;Douglas C. Sicker

  • Blockchain Integration With Digital Technology and the Future of Health Care Ecosystems: Systematic Review

    Hanaa Fatoum;Sam Hanna;John D Halamka;Douglas C Sicker

  • Security analysis of selectively encrypted MPEG-2 streams

    Tom D. Lookabaugh;Douglas C. Sicker;David M. Keaton;Wang Ye Guo

  • VoIP Security: Not an Afterthought: DDOS takes on a whole new meaning.

    Douglas C. Sicker;Tom Lookabaugh

  • Refinements of a Layered Model for Telecommunications Policy.

    Douglas C. Sicker;Joshua L. Mindel

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Grunwald
Dirk Grunwald University of Colorado Boulder
Damon McCoy
Damon McCoy New York University
M. Granger Morgan
M. Granger Morgan Carnegie Mellon University
Suresh Singh
Suresh Singh Portland State University
Tadayoshi Kohno
Tadayoshi Kohno University of Washington
Leysia Palen
Leysia Palen University of Colorado Boulder
Kathleen M. Carley
Kathleen M. Carley Carnegie Mellon University
Jonathan Rodriguez
Jonathan Rodriguez Instituto de Telecomunicações
Timothy X. Brown
Timothy X. Brown Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and industry-recognized certifications. Many students broaden their skills by pursuing fields with strong technical overlaps, such as physics, data science, and electrical engineering.

If you are interested in a solid scientific foundation, consider the online physics degree for a cost-effective way to strengthen your analytical and problem-solving skills. Data-driven careers are in high demand, and a data science degree can help you unlock opportunities in AI, business analytics, and IT.

Many tech employers also seek graduates from the best online electrical engineering programs USA, as these skills are crucial in hardware and embedded systems design. For those looking to quickly enhance their resume, there are several certifications that pay well and require less time commitment compared to completing a full degree.

By combining a Computer Science background with related online degrees or certifications, you can expand your career options and stay competitive in an ever-evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas Sicker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles