World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
170
Citations
95317
World Ranking
885
National Ranking
526

Medicine

D-Index
170
Citations
93739
World Ranking
529
National Ranking
312

Peter T. Scardino publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter T. Scardino sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,026 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter T. Scardino D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter T. Scardino sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 170 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 1996 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Peter T. Scardino is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Rheumatology, and Urology.

The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Peter T. Scardino reflect ongoing research interests in prostate cancer and clinical treatment methodologies. Notable publications include:

  • Limited versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial, 2021, European Urology Oncology
  • Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy, 2021, Nature Reviews Urology
  • MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a phase 2b, multicentre study, 2022, The Lancet Oncology
  • Risk of Metastasis in Men with Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance at a Tertiary Cancer Center, 2020, The Journal of Urology
  • Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Update from a Randomized Clinical Trial of Limited Versus Extended Dissection, 2024, European Urology

Peter T. Scardino frequently collaborates with researchers including James A. Eastham, Vincent P. Laudone, Andrew J. Vickers, Daniel D. Sjoberg, and Behfar Ehdaie.

Their work has been widely published across multiple venues, with a particular focus on:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • The Prostate
  • European Urology Open Science
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Cancer

In recognition of their contributions to the medical field, Peter T. Scardino was appointed as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 1996.

Best Publications

  • Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer

    Barry S. Taylor;Nikolaus Schultz;Haley Hieronymus;Anuradha Gopalan

  • Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

    William J. Catalona;Jerome P. Richie;Frederick R. Ahmann;M'Liss A. Hudson

  • Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

    William C Huang;Andrew S Levey;Angel M Serio;Mark Snyder

  • Organoid cultures derived from patients with advanced prostate cancer

    Dong Gao;Ian Vela;Andrea Sboner;Phillip J Iaquinta

  • Reciprocal Feedback Regulation of PI3K and Androgen Receptor Signaling in PTEN-Deficient Prostate Cancer

    Brett S. Carver;Caren Chapinski;John Wongvipat;Haley Hieronymus

  • CANCER CONTROL WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ALONE IN 1,000 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS

    Gerald W. Hull;Farhang Rabbani;Farhat Abbas;Thomas M. Wheeler

  • Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

    Andrew J. Stephenson;Peter T. Scardino;Michael W. Kattan;Thomas M. Pisansky

  • Variations in Morbidity after Radical Prostatectomy

    Colin B. Begg;Elyn R. Riedel;Peter B. Bach;Michael W. Kattan

  • Postoperative Nomogram for Disease Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

    Michael W. Kattan;Thomas M. Wheeler;Peter T. Scardino

  • Gene Expression Analysis of Human Prostate Carcinoma during Hormonal Therapy Identifies Androgen-Responsive Genes and Mechanisms of Therapy Resistance

    Jeff Holzbeierlein;Priti Lal;Eva LaTulippe;Alex Smith

  • Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study.

    Jack Cuzick;Gregory P Swanson;Gabrielle Fisher;Arthur R Brothman

  • Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

    Hedvig Hricak;Peter L. Choyke;Steven C. Eberhardt;Steven A. Leibel

  • Comprehensive gene expression analysis of prostate cancer reveals distinct transcriptional programs associated with metastatic disease.

    Eva LaTulippe;Jaya Satagopan;Alex Smith;Howard Scher

  • Aberrant ERG expression cooperates with loss of PTEN to promote cancer progression in the prostate.

    Brett S Carver;Jennifer Tran;Anuradha Gopalan;Zhenbang Chen;Zhenbang Chen

  • Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

    Andrew J. Stephenson;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Michael J. Zelefsky;Michael W. Kattan

  • Radical prostatectomy: Long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”)

    Fernando J. Bianco;Peter T. Scardino;James A. Eastham

  • Predicting 15-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy

    Scott E. Eggener;Peter T. Scardino;Patrick C. Walsh;Misop Han

  • Preoperative Nomogram Predicting the 10-Year Probability of Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy

    Andrew J. Stephenson;Peter T. Scardino;James A. Eastham;Fernando J. Bianco

  • The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer

    Adam Abeshouse;Jaeil Ahn;Rehan Akbani;Adrian Ally

  • Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional update.

    Walsh Pc

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Eastham
James A. Eastham Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael W. Kattan
Michael W. Kattan Cleveland Clinic
Andrew J. Vickers
Andrew J. Vickers Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Thomas M. Wheeler
Thomas M. Wheeler Baylor College of Medicine
Hans Lilja
Hans Lilja Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Victor E. Reuter
Victor E. Reuter Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Hedvig Hricak
Hedvig Hricak Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
John P. Mulhall
John P. Mulhall Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Eric A. Klein
Eric A. Klein Cleveland Clinic
Jack Cuzick
Jack Cuzick Queen Mary University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in studying Medicine in the USA grows, more students are exploring alternative and flexible healthcare career options through online education. Advancements in online learning now make it possible to pursue health-related degrees and certificates completely remotely—ideal for those balancing work, family, and academic goals.

For example, online pharmacy school programs offer a pathway for those interested in pharmaceutical sciences and roles as licensed pharmacists. Similarly, accredited him programs are essential for students looking to enter the growing field of health information management.

Those seeking a shorter training route into healthcare can consider medical billing and coding certification online, opening doors to administrative and technical roles in hospitals and clinics. For nurses wishing to advance their careers, affordable np programs provide an accessible way to gain the expertise needed to become a nurse practitioner.

These online programs allow healthcare professionals to match their education with their career ambitions, often at a lower cost and on a more flexible schedule than traditional on-campus degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Peter T. Scardino

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles