World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 94 10377 9742 5340 4934 944 37606

Matthew R. Cooperberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew R. Cooperberg between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew R. Cooperberg published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 35.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 110 publications in 2023. 84 of the 1,073 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 110. Peak 110 publications in 2023. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 36 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 51 publications 2014: 57 publications 2015: 66 publications 2016: 69 publications 2017: 84 publications 2018: 55 publications 2019: 66 publications 2020: 68 publications 2021: 72 publications 2022: 56 publications 2023: 110 publications 2024: 57 publications 2025: 75 publications 2026: 9 publications
1997 2026

1,073 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew R. Cooperberg: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 9
2004 10
2005 11
2006 8
2007 10
2008 13
2009 20
2010 21
2011 36
2012 33
2013 51
2014 57
2015 66
2016 69
2017 84
2018 55
2019 66
2020 68
2021 72
2022 56
2023 110
2024 57
2025 75
2026 9
Total 1,073
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Cooperberg publications per year - data summary

  • Matthew R. Cooperberg, a Medicine scholar from University of California, San Francisco, has 1,073 publications recorded across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 110 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1997, 1998 and 2002, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 30 years in the span carries no publications at all (1999).
  • The rate of publication averages 35.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 37.0 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 307 publications, 29% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 45 publications (4.5 per year); 2007-2016: 376 publications (37.6 per year); 2017-2026: 652 publications (65.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Matthew R. Cooperberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Cooperberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 941–960 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 944 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133 944
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Cooperberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Matthew R. Cooperberg, a Medicine scholar from University of California, San Francisco, records 944 publications - the 93rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 93% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Matthew R. Cooperberg, and about 7% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Matthew R. Cooperberg ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Matthew R. Cooperberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Cooperberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 94
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Cooperberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Matthew R. Cooperberg, a Medicine scholar from University of California, San Francisco, records 94 D-Index - the 49th percentile of the discipline.
  • 49% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Matthew R. Cooperberg, and about 51% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Matthew R. Cooperberg falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Matthew R. Cooperberg is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their body of research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, surgery, and economics and econometrics.

The scientist's research is concentrated in topics related to prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, prostate cancer treatment and research, bladder and urothelial cancer treatments, global cancer incidence and screening, health systems and economic evaluations including quality of life, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, as well as cancer, lipids, and metabolism.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Matthew R. Cooperberg include:

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection, 2021, JAMA Oncology
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Through 5 Years for Active Surveillance, Surgery, Brachytherapy, or External Beam Radiation With or Without Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer, 2020, JAMA
  • Single-cell analysis of human primary prostate cancer reveals the heterogeneity of tumor-associated epithelial cell states, 2022, Nature Communications
  • A Systematic Review of the Evidence for the Decipher Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer, 2020, European Urology
  • Radical Prostatectomy or Observation for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Extended Follow-up of the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT), 2020, European Urology

Collaborations have been frequent with several researchers, reflecting a broad network in the prostate cancer research community. Key co-authors include:

  • Peter R. Carroll
  • Janet E. Cowan
  • Samuel L. Washington
  • Stephen J. Freedland
  • Christopher J. Kane

Matthew R. Cooperberg has published extensively in several academic journals. The most frequent venues for their work are:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • European Urology
  • Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
  • European Urology Oncology

Best Publications

  • The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer

    Adam Abeshouse;Jaeil Ahn;Rehan Akbani;Adrian Ally

  • Time Trends and Local Variation in Primary Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Jeanette M. Broering;Peter R. Carroll

  • A 17-gene Assay to Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness in the Context of Gleason Grade Heterogeneity, Tumor Multifocality, and Biopsy Undersampling

    Eric A. Klein;Matthew R. Cooperberg;Cristina Magi-Galluzzi;Jeffry P. Simko

  • Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Marc A. Dall’Era;Peter C. Albertsen;Christopher Bangma;Peter R. Carroll

  • Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base.

    Christopher J. Kane;Katherine Mallin;Jamie Ritchey;Matthew R. Cooperberg

  • The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;David J. Pasta;Eric P. Elkin;Mark S. Litwin

  • The Changing Face of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Trends in Clinical Presentation and Primary Management

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Deborah P. Lubeck;Maxwell V. Meng;Shilpa S. Mehta

  • Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Peter R. Carroll

  • Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment.

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Jeannette M. Broering;Philip W. Kantoff;Peter R. Carroll

  • THE CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES: LESSONS FROM THE CANCER OF THE PROSTATE STRATEGIC UROLOGIC RESEARCH ENDEAVOR (CAPSURE), A NATIONAL DISEASE REGISTRY

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Jeanette M. Broering;Mark S. Litwin;Deborah P. Lubeck

  • Active Surveillance for the Management of Prostate Cancer in a Contemporary Cohort

    Marc A. Dall'Era;Badrinath R. Konety;Janet E. Cowan;Katsuto Shinohara

  • The CAPRA-S score: a straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Joan F. Hilton;Peter R. Carroll

  • Impact of Age at Diagnosis on Prostate Cancer Treatment and Survival

    Seth K. Bechis;Peter R. Carroll;Matthew R. Cooperberg

  • Risk Assessment for Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Mortality at the Time of Diagnosis

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Jeanette M. Broering;Peter R. Carroll

  • The Changing Face of Prostate Cancer

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Judd W. Moul;Peter R. Carroll

  • Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement

    Ronald C. Chen;R. Bryan Rumble;D. Andrew Loblaw;Antonio Finelli

  • Validation of a Cell-Cycle Progression Gene Panel to Improve Risk Stratification in a Contemporary Prostatectomy Cohort

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Jeffry P. Simko;Janet E. Cowan;Julia E. Reid

  • Epidemiology of prostate cancer.

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;June M. Chan

  • The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer

    Adam Abeshouse;Jaeil Ahn;Rehan Akbani;Adrian Ally

  • The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Score

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;David J. Pasta;Eric P. Elkin;Mark Litwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter R. Carroll
Peter R. Carroll University of California, San Francisco
Stephen J. Freedland
Stephen J. Freedland Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
William J. Aronson
William J. Aronson University of California, Los Angeles
Martha K. Terris
Martha K. Terris Augusta University
Christopher J. Kane
Christopher J. Kane University of California, San Diego
David F. Penson
David F. Penson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
June M. Chan
June M. Chan University of California, San Francisco
Katsuto Shinohara
Katsuto Shinohara University of California, San Francisco
Daniel W. Lin
Daniel W. Lin University of Washington
Celestia S. Higano
Celestia S. Higano University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in exploring alternative career options within the healthcare field, there are several flexible online degrees to consider. For those focused on pharmaceuticals, an online pharmacist degree offers a solid route to a professional career as a licensed pharmacist, often with greater affordability and convenience.

For students drawn to health data and systems, pursuing an online mhi program can open doors to roles managing medical information and technology within hospitals and clinics.

If you are seeking a program with rapid entry into the workforce, consider online medical billing and coding. These courses prepare you to work with healthcare records, insurance claims, and administrative tasks, with high demand across the country.

Aspiring advanced practice nurses can benefit from searching for the cheapest np school options, making it possible to advance your nursing career while managing costs.

Each of these online pathways offers unique advantages and career outcomes, letting you tailor your healthcare journey to fit your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew R. Cooperberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles