World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
73
Citations
19366
World Ranking
19654
National Ranking
9788

Martha K. Terris publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha K. Terris sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 599 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martha K. Terris D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martha K. Terris sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Cancer
  • Surgery

Her primary areas of investigation include Prostate cancer, Prostatectomy, Prostate, Biopsy and Prostate-specific antigen. Her Prostate cancer study combines topics in areas such as Urinary system and Surgery, Retrospective cohort study. Her Prostatectomy research is classified as research in Internal medicine.

Her Prostate research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Prospective cohort study, Radiology, Ultrasound and Urology. She has included themes like Prostate biopsy and Sextant in her Biopsy study. Her work carried out in the field of Prostate-specific antigen brings together such families of science as Stage and Proportional hazards model.

Her most cited work include:

  • Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate (1310 citations)
  • Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. (437 citations)
  • Impact of Obesity on Biochemical Control After Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Report by the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database Study Group (347 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Prostate cancer, Prostatectomy, Internal medicine, Oncology and Prostate are her primary areas of study. The study incorporates disciplines such as Proportional hazards model, Surgery, Biopsy and Hazard ratio in addition to Prostate cancer. Her work on Biochemical recurrence as part of general Prostatectomy research is frequently linked to Database, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.

Her research combines Gynecology and Internal medicine. Martha K. Terris has researched Prostate in several fields, including Adenocarcinoma, Radiology, Ultrasound and Pathology. Her biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Predictive value of tests and Retrospective cohort study.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Prostate cancer (74.02%)
  • Prostatectomy (70.10%)
  • Internal medicine (52.94%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Prostate cancer (74.02%)
  • Internal medicine (52.94%)
  • Prostatectomy (70.10%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Martha K. Terris mainly focuses on Prostate cancer, Internal medicine, Prostatectomy, Oncology and Proportional hazards model. Her studies deal with areas such as Metastasis, Cohort, Veterans Affairs and Hazard ratio as well as Prostate cancer. Her work on Biochemical recurrence as part of general Prostatectomy study is frequently linked to Database, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.

Her Oncology study which covers Bladder cancer that intersects with Metabolomics and Cancer research. Her studies in Proportional hazards model integrate themes in fields like Prostate-specific antigen, Gynecology and Disease. Her Prostate research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Incidence and Hyperplasia.

Between 2016 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Association of Black Race with Prostate Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality (84 citations)
  • Predicting Time From Metastasis to Overall Survival in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results From SEARCH (31 citations)
  • Hyaluronic acid family in bladder cancer: potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. (29 citations)

Best Publications

  • Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate

    Kathryn K. Hodge;John E. McNeal;Martha K. Terris;Thomas A. Stamey

  • Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound.

    Martha K. Terris;Thomas A. Stamey

  • RISKS AND COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

    Larissa V. Rodriguez;Martha K. Terris

  • Impact of Obesity on Biochemical Control After Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Report by the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital Database Study Group

    Stephen J. Freedland;William J. Aronson;Christopher J. Kane;Joseph C. Presti

  • Obesity-related plasma hemodilution and PSA concentration among men with prostate cancer.

    Lionel L. Bañez;Robert J. Hamilton;Robert J. Hamilton;Alan W. Partin;Robin T. Vollmer

  • Association of Black Race with Prostate Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality

    Robert T. Dess;Holly E. Hartman;Brandon A. Mahal;Payal D. Soni

  • Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies in diagnosis and staging of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer.

    I. Jenna Liu;I. Jenna Liu;I. Jenna Liu;Muhammad Behzad Zafar;Yen Han Lai;George M. Segall

  • Gene expression patterns in renal cell carcinoma assessed by complementary DNA microarray.

    John P.T. Higgins;Rajesh Shinghal;Harcharan Gill;Jeffrey H. Reese

  • Bacteremia and bacteriuria after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

    Kelly A. Lindert;John N. Kabalin;Martha K. Terris

  • Prostate Size and Risk of High-Grade, Advanced Prostate Cancer and Biochemical Progression After Radical Prostatectomy: A Search Database Study

    Stephen J. Freedland;William B. Isaacs;Elizabeth A. Platz;Martha Kennedy Terris

  • Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsies

    Martha K. Terris;John E. McNeal;Thomas A. Stamey

  • Dietary supplementation with cranberry concentrate tablets may increase the risk of nephrolithiasis.

    Martha K Terris;Martha K Terris;Muta M Issa;J.Ronald Tacker;J.Ronald Tacker

  • Metabolomic Profiling Reveals Potential Markers and Bioprocesses Altered in Bladder Cancer Progression

    Nagireddy Putluri;Ali Shojaie;Ali Shojaie;Vihas T Vasu;Vihas T Vasu;Shaiju K Vareed

  • Progressive decrease in bone density over 10 years of androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer.

    B.Jenny Kiratli;Sandy Srinivas;Sandy Srinivas;Inder Perkash;Inder Perkash;Martha K Terris;Martha K Terris

  • Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Needle Biopsy Specimens: Risk Factors and Clinical Implications

    Stephen J. Freedland;Christopher J. Kane;Christopher J. Kane;Christopher L. Amling;Christopher L. Amling;William J. Aronson;William J. Aronson

  • Original Articles: Prostate Cancer: Indications for Ultrasound Guided Transition Zone Biopsies in the Detection of Prostate Cancer

    Paul D. Lui;Martha K. Terris;John E. McNeal;Thomas A. Stamey

  • Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

    Soum D. Lokeshwar;Benjamin T. Harper;Eric Webb;Andre Jordan

  • Obesity, Serum Prostate Specific Antigen and Prostate Size: Implications for Prostate Cancer Detection

    Stephen J. Freedland;Elizabeth A. Platz;Joseph C. Presti;William J. Aronson

  • Indications for ultrasound guided transition zone biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer

    Paul D. Lui;Martha K. Terris;John E. McNeal;Thomas A. Stamey

  • Transurethral needle ablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 5-Year results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial

    Brian Hill;William Belville;Reginald Bruskewitz;Muta Issa

Frequent Co-Authors

William J. Aronson
William J. Aronson University of California, Los Angeles
Stephen J. Freedland
Stephen J. Freedland Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Christopher J. Kane
Christopher J. Kane University of California, San Diego
Matthew R. Cooperberg
Matthew R. Cooperberg University of California, San Francisco
Thomas A. Stamey
Thomas A. Stamey Stanford University
Thomas J. Polascik
Thomas J. Polascik Duke University
John E. McNeal
John E. McNeal Stanford University
Nagireddy Putluri
Nagireddy Putluri Baylor College of Medicine
Judd W. Moul
Judd W. Moul Duke University
Leah Gerber
Leah Gerber Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA often leads students to consider related healthcare fields and flexible online learning opportunities. Earning a healthcare administration online degree is a popular path for those interested in leadership roles within health organizations, offering a curriculum focused on policy, operations, and patient care management.

Registered nurses looking to advance their careers may opt for adn to np programs online, which provide a streamlined route to becoming a nurse practitioner. These programs are designed for working RNs seeking to boost their clinical skills and credentials with more flexible scheduling.

Students passionate about preventive health and wellness can consider the best online nutrition degree programs. These degrees prepare graduates for careers in dietetics, community health, and nutrition counseling.

For individuals aiming for executive roles in hospitals or health systems, accredited mha programs ensure you gain a recognized Master of Health Administration credential. With CAHME accreditation, graduates are prepared for advanced leadership positions.

Best Scientists Citing Martha K. Terris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles