World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 103 7413 6965 3874 3584 778 35680

Judd W. Moul publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Judd W. Moul between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Judd W. Moul published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 19.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2009. 18 of the 794 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2009. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 11 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 23 publications 1998: 27 publications 1999: 33 publications 2000: 35 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 32 publications 2003: 34 publications 2004: 41 publications 2005: 32 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 47 publications 2009: 48 publications 2010: 43 publications 2011: 39 publications 2012: 40 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 12 publications
1986 2025

794 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Judd W. Moul: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 3
1989 7
1990 5
1991 5
1992 11
1993 8
1994 16
1995 10
1996 16
1997 23
1998 27
1999 33
2000 35
2001 22
2002 32
2003 34
2004 41
2005 32
2006 21
2007 33
2008 47
2009 48
2010 43
2011 39
2012 40
2013 18
2014 19
2015 16
2016 17
2017 17
2018 8
2019 7
2020 13
2021 7
2022 10
2023 12
2024 6
2025 12
Total 794
Download as CSV

Judd W. Moul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judd W. Moul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 778 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 778
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Judd W. Moul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judd W. Moul sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630 103
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Judd W. Moul is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly focusing on oncology and prostate cancer. Their body of work includes more than one hundred publications primarily within the field of medicine.

The scientist's research spans several subfields, prominently including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, cancer research, surgery, and economics and econometrics. These diverse interests underscore a multidisciplinary approach to medical science.

The main topics addressed in their work include prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, prostate cancer treatment and research, cancer related to lipids and metabolism, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, cardiac anesthesia and surgical outcomes, anesthesia and neurotoxicity research, and lymphoma diagnosis and treatment.

Judd W. Moul has published in several notable venues throughout their career. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • ONCOLOGY
  • The Journal of Urology
  • Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
  • Urology
  • Urology Practice

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers, including frequent coauthors such as Neck Cancer, Howard S. Höchster, New Brunswick, William J. Gradishar, and Tari A. King, reflecting a collaborative research environment.

Selected recent papers exemplify the range and focus of their research:

  • Biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after primary definitive therapy: treatment based on risk stratification, 2023, published in Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of a 6-Month Low-Carbohydrate Intervention on Disease Progression in Men with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Carbohydrate and Prostate Study 2 (CAPS2), 2020, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Postoperative changes in cognition and cerebrospinal fluid neurodegenerative disease biomarkers, 2022, Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • Current Frontline Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, 2022, ONCOLOGY
  • A protocol to reduce self-reported pain scores and adverse events following lumbar punctures in older adults, 2020, Journal of Neurology

Best Publications

  • Guideline for the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: 2007 Update

    Ian Thompson;James Brantley Thrasher;Gunnar Aus;Arthur L. Burnett

  • Variation in the Definition of Biochemical Recurrence in Patients Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer: The American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel Report and Recommendations for a Standard in the Reporting of Surgical Outcomes

    Michael S. Cookson;Gunnar Aus;Arthur L. Burnett;Edith D. Canby-Hagino

  • Age-Specific Reference Ranges for Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen in Black Men

    Ted O. Morgan;Steven J. Jacobsen;William F. McCarthy;Debra J. Jacobson

  • Surrogate End Point for Prostate Cancer–Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation Therapy

    Anthony V. D’Amico;Judd W. Moul;Peter R. Carroll;Leon Sun

  • Cancer-Specific Mortality After Surgery or Radiation for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Managed During the Prostate-Specific Antigen Era

    Anthony V. D’Amico;Judd Moul;Peter R. Carroll;Leon Sun

  • Frequent Detection of Codon 877 Mutation in the Androgen Receptor Gene in Advanced Prostate Cancers

    Jaya P. Gaddipati;David G. McLeod;Howard B. Heidenberg;Isabell A. Sesterhenn

  • Updated prognostic model for predicting overall survival in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

    Susan Halabi;Chen-Yen Lin;W. Kevin Kelly;Karim S. Fizazi

  • Pathologic Variables and Recurrence Rates As Related to Obesity and Race in Men With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

    Christopher L. Amling;Robert H. Riffenburgh;Leon Sun;Judd W. Moul

  • Prostate specific antigen only progression of prostate cancer

    Judd W. Moul

  • Frequent overexpression of ETS-related gene-1 (ERG1) in prostate cancer transcriptome

    Gyorgy Petrovics;Aijun Liu;Syed Shaheduzzaman;Bungo Furasato

  • PCGEM1, a prostate-specific gene, is overexpressed in prostate cancer

    Vasantha Srikantan;Zhiqiang Zou;Gyorgy Petrovics;Linda Xu

  • Obesity-related plasma hemodilution and PSA concentration among men with prostate cancer.

    Lionel L. Bañez;Robert J. Hamilton;Robert J. Hamilton;Alan W. Partin;Robin T. Vollmer

  • The Changing Face of Prostate Cancer

    Matthew R. Cooperberg;Judd W. Moul;Peter R. Carroll

  • Evaluation of Serum Protein Profiling by Surface-Enhanced Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: I. Assessment of Platform Reproducibility

    O. John Semmes;Ziding Feng;Bao Ling Adam;Lionel L. Banez

  • p53 regulates the expression of the tumor suppressor gene maspin.

    Zhiqiang Zou;Chunling Gao;Akhilesh K. Nagaich;Theresa Connell

  • Satisfaction and Regret after Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

    Florian R. Schroeck;Tracey L. Krupski;Leon Sun;David M. Albala

  • Pretreatment Total Testosterone Level Predicts Pathological Stage in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy

    Jason C. Massengill;Leon Sun;Judd W. Moul;Hongyu Wu

  • Prostate-Specific Antigen Values at the Time of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in African-American Men

    Judd W. Moul;Isabell A. Sesterhenn;Roger R. Connelly;Thomas Douglas

  • Radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T1-2N0M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results.

    David F. Paulson;Judd W. Moul;Philip J. Walther

  • Early versus delayed hormonal therapy for prostate specific antigen only recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

    Judd W. Moul;Judd W. Moul;Hongyu Wu;Leon Sun;David G. McLEOD

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. McLeod
David G. McLeod Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Thomas J. Polascik
Thomas J. Polascik Duke University
Isabell A. Sesterhenn
Isabell A. Sesterhenn United States Army Research Laboratory
Shiv Srivastava
Shiv Srivastava Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Stephen J. Freedland
Stephen J. Freedland Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Christopher J. Kane
Christopher J. Kane University of California, San Diego
Anthony V. D'Amico
Anthony V. D'Amico Brigham and Women's Hospital
Leah Gerber
Leah Gerber Duke University
E. David Crawford
E. David Crawford University of California, San Diego
Ming-Hui Chen
Ming-Hui Chen University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine isn’t limited to becoming a physician. There are several online degree options and flexible career pathways that support healthcare delivery and management. For registered nurses looking to advance, adn to np bridge programs offer a convenient route to become nurse practitioners through online learning.

If nutrition science interests you, earning an online nutrition degree can open doors in clinical, community, and wellness settings. For those with leadership ambitions, cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs prepare graduates for vital roles in healthcare management and policy, with the advantage of accredited online learning.

Nurses considering a bachelor’s degree can explore if their chosen does rn to bsn require clinicals—some RN to BSN programs have reduced or no clinical requirements, making them flexible for working professionals. These options offer pathways to healthcare careers beyond traditional medical schooling, supporting students with diverse goals in the industry.

Best Scientists Citing Judd W. Moul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles