World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
6861
World Ranking
6564
National Ranking
96

Bo Dalsgaard publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bo Dalsgaard sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 87 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Bo Dalsgaard D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bo Dalsgaard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bo Dalsgaard is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research primarily spans Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong focus on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, as well as Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. Other subfields of their study include Ecological Modeling and Insect Science.

The scientist's main topics of work involve Plant and animal studies, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Species Distribution and Climate Change, as well as Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Insect and Pesticide Research, and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies.

Bo Dalsgaard has contributed to several peer-reviewed papers, including:

  • Ecological mechanisms explaining interactions within plant-hummingbird networks: morphological matching increases towards lower latitudes, 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • The influence of biogeographical and evolutionary histories on morphological trait-matching and resource specialization in mutualistic hummingbird-plant networks, 2021, Functional Ecology
  • The evolution, ecology, and conservation of hummingbirds and their interactions with flowering plants, 2022, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • The value of biotic pollination and dense forest for fruit set of Arabica coffee: A global assessment, 2021, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Biodiversity cradles and museums segregating within hotspots of endemism, 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bo Dalsgaard include Pietro K. Maruyama, Benno I. Simmons, Carsten Rahbek, Fernando Gonçalves, and Jesper Sonne.

The scientist publishes regularly in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Functional Ecology, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Nature Ecology & Evolution.

Best Publications

  • The Influence of Late Quaternary Climate-Change Velocity on Species Endemism

    B. Sandel;L. Arge;B. Dalsgaard;R. G. Davies

  • Humboldt’s enigma: What causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity?

    Carsten Rahbek;Carsten Rahbek;Carsten Rahbek;Michael K. Borregaard;Robert K. Colwell;Robert K. Colwell;Robert K. Colwell;Bo Dalsgaard

  • Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks

    Ana M. Martín González;Ana M. Martín González;Bo Dalsgaard;Jens Mogens Olesen

  • Specialization of Mutualistic Interaction Networks Decreases toward Tropical Latitudes

    Matthias Schleuning;Jochen Fründ;Alexandra-Maria Klein;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Stefan Abrahamczyk

  • The dimensionality of ecological networks

    Anna Eklöf;Ute Jacob;Jason Kopp;Jordi Bosch

  • Ecological, historical and evolutionary determinants of modularity in weighted seed-dispersal networks

    Matthias Schleuning;Lili Ingmann;Rouven Strauß;Susanne A. Fritz

  • Global distribution and drivers of language extinction risk

    Tatsuya Amano;Brody Sandel;Heidi Eager;Edouard Bulteau

  • Specialization in Plant-Hummingbird Networks Is Associated with Species Richness, Contemporary Precipitation and Quaternary Climate-Change Velocity

    Bo Dalsgaard;Bo Dalsgaard;Bo Dalsgaard;Else Magård;Jon Fjeldså;Ana M. Martín González

  • Plant-hummingbird interactions in the West Indies: floral specialisation gradients associated with environment and hummingbird size

    Bo Dalsgaard;Bo Dalsgaard;Ana M. Martín González;Jens M. Olesen;Jeff Ollerton

  • Morphological and Spatio-Temporal Mismatches Shape a Neotropical Savanna Plant-Hummingbird Network

    Pietro K. Maruyama;Pietro K. Maruyama;Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni;Genilda M. Oliveira;Paulo E. Oliveira

  • Historical climate‐change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks

    Bo Dalsgaard;Kristian Trøjelsgaard;Ana M. Martín González;David Nogués-Bravo

  • Opposed latitudinal patterns of network‐derived and dietary specialization in avian plant–frugivore interaction systems

    Bo Dalsgaard;Matthias Schleuning;Pietro K. Maruyama;D. Matthias Dehling

  • The macroecology of phylogenetically structured hummingbird–plant networks

    Ana M. Martín González;Bo Dalsgaard;David Nogués-Bravo;Catherine H. Graham

  • Macroecological trends in nestedness and modularity of seed-dispersal networks: human impact matters

    Esther Sebastián-González;Bo Dalsgaard;Brody Steven Sandel;Paulo R. Guimarães

  • Biogeographical modules and island roles: a comparison of Wallacea and the West Indies

    Daniel Wisbech Carstensen;Bo Dalsgaard;Bo Dalsgaard;Jens-Christian Svenning;Carsten Rahbek

  • Global patterns of interaction specialization in bird–flower networks

    Thais B. Zanata;Thais B. Zanata;Bo Dalsgaard;Fernando C. Passos;Peter A. Cotton

  • Influences of sampling effort on detected patterns and structuring processes of a Neotropical plant–hummingbird network

    Jeferson Vizentin‐Bugoni;Jeferson Vizentin‐Bugoni;Pietro K. Maruyama;Vanderlei J. Debastiani;L. da S. Duarte

  • Pollination syndromes ignored: importance of non-ornithophilous flowers to Neotropical savanna hummingbirds

    Pietro K. Maruyama;Pietro K. Maruyama;Genilda M. Oliveira;Carolina Ferreira;Bo Dalsgaard

  • The evolution, ecology, and conservation of hummingbirds and their interactions with flowering plants

    Unknown

  • The macroecology of animal versus wind pollination: ecological factors are more important than historical climate stability

    André Rodrigo Rech;Bo Dalsgaard;Brody Sandel;Jesper Sonne

  • Ecological mechanisms explaining interactions within plant-hummingbird networks: Morphological matching increases towards lower latitudes

    Jesper Sonne;Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni;Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni;Pietro K. Maruyama;Pietro K. Maruyama;Andréa C. Araujo

  • Nectar robbery by a hermit hummingbird: association to floral phenotype and its influence on flowers and network structure

    Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama;Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama;Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni;Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni;Bo Dalsgaard;Ivan Sazima

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten Rahbek
Carsten Rahbek University of Copenhagen
Marlies Sazima
Marlies Sazima State University of Campinas
Brody Sandel
Brody Sandel Santa Clara University
Jens-Christian Svenning
Jens-Christian Svenning Aarhus University
William J. Sutherland
William J. Sutherland University of Cambridge
Matthias Schleuning
Matthias Schleuning Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Jeff Ollerton
Jeff Ollerton University of Northampton
Peter A. Cotton
Peter A. Cotton Plymouth University
Allan Timmermann
Allan Timmermann University of California, San Diego
Jens M. Olesen
Jens M. Olesen Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in branching out from Ecology and Evolution? Many students explore related online degree programs to expand their career opportunities. Thanks to flexible learning options, more people than ever can pursue quality education from home.

For those leaning toward healthcare or interdisciplinary science, programs such as best value nursing education online wgu offer a unique blend of affordability and academic quality. These options give you insights into medical and environmental health connections.

You might also consider online bsn programs if you’re aiming to build a broader science background or pursue careers in health education, public health, or research. These bridge programs are designed to be both flexible and accessible.

When selecting a school, choosing an institution recognized among the non profit university options ensures credibility and academic rigor. Additionally, those serving in the military, or veterans, may benefit from colleges listed among the online military friendly colleges, which support unique scheduling and tuition needs.

Exploring online degrees related to Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career pathways in science, policy, education, and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Bo Dalsgaard

Trending Scientists