World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 42 6592 6365 1807 1676 180 6766

F. Necati Catbas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by F. Necati Catbas between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. F. Necati Catbas published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 8.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2011. 23 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2011. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 15 publications
2000 2025

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
F. Necati Catbas: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 3
2008 12
2009 7
2010 10
2011 16
2012 15
2013 12
2014 16
2015 9
2016 8
2017 11
2018 10
2019 9
2020 11
2021 9
2022 14
2023 8
2024 8
2025 15
Total 213
Download as CSV

F. Necati Catbas publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Necati Catbas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 180 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421 180
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

F. Necati Catbas D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where F. Necati Catbas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426 42
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

F. Necati Catbas is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States and specializes in engineering, with a focus on civil and structural engineering. Their research extensively covers topics related to infrastructure maintenance and monitoring, structural health monitoring techniques, and concrete corrosion and durability. Additional areas of study include 3D surveying and cultural heritage, geophysical methods and applications, structural engineering and vibration analysis, as well as non-destructive testing techniques.

Catbas has contributed to a number of recent publications in various reputable venues. These include:

  • "A review of computer vision-based structural health monitoring at local and global levels" (2020), published in Structural Health Monitoring
  • "Swaying displacement measurement for structural monitoring using computer vision and an unmanned aerial vehicle" (2020), published in Measurement
  • "Attention-guided analysis of infrastructure damage with semi-supervised deep learning" (2021), published in Automation in Construction
  • "Generative adversarial networks for labeled acceleration data augmentation for structural damage detection" (2022), published in Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
  • "CycleGAN for undamaged-to-damaged domain translation for structural health monitoring and damage detection" (2023), published in Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Catbas include Furkan Luleci, Onur Avcı, Chuan-Zhi Dong, Selçuk Baş, and Enes Karaaslan.

Catbas has published repeatedly in several scientific venues, such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Built Environment
  • Sensors
  • Automation in Construction
  • Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring

The research profile of Catbas reflects a comprehensive engagement in engineering disciplines, particularly focusing on the integration of computer vision, deep learning, and data augmentation techniques for structural health monitoring and damage detection.

Best Publications

  • Structural Health Monitoring and Reliability Estimation: Long Span Truss Bridge Application With Environmental Monitoring Data

    F. Necati Catbas;Melih Susoy;Dan M. Frangopol

  • Statistical pattern recognition for Structural Health Monitoring using time series modeling: Theory and experimental verifications

    Mustafa Gul;F. Necati Catbas

  • CONDITION AND DAMAGE ASSESSMENT: ISSUES AND SOME PROMISING INDICES

    F. Necati Catbas;A. Emin Aktan

  • Completely contactless structural health monitoring of real‐life structures using cameras and computer vision

    Tung Khuc;F. Necati Catbas

  • Structural health monitoring and damage assessment using a novel time series analysis methodology with sensor clustering

    Mustafa Gul;F. Necati Catbas

  • Computer vision-based displacement and vibration monitoring without using physical target on structures

    Tung Khuc;F. Necati Catbas

  • Parameter Estimation for Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Modal Analysis of Large Structures

    F. Necati Catbas;David L. Brown;A. Emin Aktan

  • Use of Modal Flexibility for Damage Detection and Condition Assessment: Case Studies and Demonstrations on Large Structures

    F. Necati Catbas;F. Necati Catbas;F. Necati Catbas;David L. Brown;David L. Brown;David L. Brown;A. Emin Aktan;A. Emin Aktan;A. Emin Aktan

  • Structural displacement monitoring using deep learning-based full field optical flow methods

    Chuan Zhi Dong;Ozan Celik;F. Necati Catbas;Eugene J. O’Brien

  • Structural identification of constructed systems : approaches, methods, and technologies for effective practice of St-Id

    F. Necati Çatbaş;Tracy Kijewski-Correa;A. Emin Aktan

  • Marker-free monitoring of the grandstand structures and modal identification using computer vision methods:

    Chuan-Zhi Dong;Ozan Celik;F Necati Catbas

  • Ambient Vibration Data Analysis for Structural Identification and Global Condition Assessment

    Mustafa Gul;F. Necati Catbas

  • Automated finite element model updating of a scale bridge model using measured static and modal test data

    Masoud Sanayei;Ali Khaloo;Mustafa Gul;F. Necati Catbas

  • Practical identification of favorable time windows for infrared thermography for concrete bridge evaluation

    Azusa Watase;Recep Birgul;Recep Birgul;Shuhei Hiasa;Masato Matsumoto

  • Conceptual damage-sensitive features for structural health monitoring: Laboratory and field demonstrations

    F. Necati Catbas;Mustafa Gul;Jason L. Burkett

  • Damage Assessment with Ambient Vibration Data Using a Novel Time Series Analysis Methodology

    Mustafa Gul;F. Necati Catbas

  • Structural health monitoring using video stream, influence lines, and statistical analysis:

    Ricardo Zaurin;F. Necati Catbas

  • Structural Identification Using Computer Vision–Based Bridge Health Monitoring

    Tung Khuc;F. Necati Catbas

  • Nonparametric analysis of structural health monitoring data for identification and localization of changes: Concept, lab, and real-life studies:

    F Necati Catbas;Hasan B Gokce;Mustafa Gul

  • Sensor Networks, Computer Imaging, and Unit Influence Lines for Structural Health Monitoring: Case Study for Bridge Load Rating

    F. Necati Catbas;Ricardo Zaurin;Mustafa Gul;Hasan Burak Gokce

  • Attention-guided analysis of infrastructure damage with semi-supervised deep learning

    Enes Karaaslan;Ulas Bagci;F. Necati Catbas

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan M. Frangopol
Dan M. Frangopol Lehigh University
Eugene J. O'Brien
Eugene J. O'Brien University College Dublin
Ulas Bagci
Ulas Bagci Northwestern University
Naim Kapucu
Naim Kapucu University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA often intersects with essential business, management, and entrepreneurial skills. Many students complement their technical studies with business-focused degrees to expand their career prospects and assume leadership roles.

For those interested in entrepreneurship, pursuing an online mba entrepreneurship can help engineers launch their own startups or drive innovation within established companies. Alternatively, professionals seeking flexible admission requirements might consider an online mba without gmat, which provides advanced business knowledge without the stress of standardized test scores.

Strong project management skills are also crucial in engineering sectors. Earning a project management degree online can help engineers coordinate teams, oversee complex projects, and improve efficiency across industries.

Additionally, those interested in infrastructure, urban development, or property management may benefit from online real estate degree programs. These specialized pathways enable technically-skilled professionals to branch into roles such as real estate development, investment, or property technology.

Best Scientists Citing F. Necati Catbas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles