World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
28891
World Ranking
13144
National Ranking
6707

Quoc-Dien Trinh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quoc-Dien Trinh sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,257 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Quoc-Dien Trinh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Quoc-Dien Trinh sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Quoc-Dien Trinh is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, with a primary focus in the field of Medicine. Their research spans several subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Surgery, Economics and Econometrics, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, most notably in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, prostate cancer treatment and research, global cancer incidence and screening, economic and financial impacts of cancer, bladder and urothelial cancer treatments, health systems including economic evaluations and quality of life assessments, as well as the impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with this researcher include Alexander P. Cole, Adam S. Kibel, Muhieddine Labban, Stuart R. Lipsitz, and David-Dan Nguyen.

Quoc-Dien Trinh has a significant publication record in a variety of scientific journals and venues, with repeated contributions to:

  • The Journal of Urology (70 publications)
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations (15 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (15 publications)
  • Urology Practice (13 publications)
  • European Urology (10 publications)

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Quoc-Dien Trinh are:

  • Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Diagnoses During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021, published in JAMA Oncology
  • Extended Versus Limited Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: Early Oncological Outcomes from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial, 2020, published in European Urology
  • Assessment of Time-to-Treatment Initiation and Survival in a Cohort of Patients With Common Cancers, 2020, published in JAMA Network Open
  • Investigation of Suicidality and Psychological Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Finasteride, 2020, published in JAMA Dermatology
  • Racial and Ethnic Variation in PSA Testing and Prostate Cancer Incidence Following the 2012 USPSTF Recommendation, 2020, published in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Best Publications

  • Distribution of metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis

    M. Bianchi;M. Sun;C. Jeldres;S. F. Shariat

  • Multi-institutional validation of a new renal cancer-specific survival nomogram.

    Pierre I. Karakiewicz;Alberto Briganti;Felix K H Chun;Quoc Dien Trinh

  • Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: A population-based analysis

    Giorgio Gandaglia;Giorgio Gandaglia;Firas Abdollah;Firas Abdollah;Jonas Schiffmann;Vincent Trudeau

  • Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Open Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

    Quoc Dien Trinh;Quoc Dien Trinh;Jesse Sammon;Maxine Sun;Praful Ravi

  • Lack of reduction in racial disparities in cancer-specific mortality over a 20-year period.

    Ayal A. Aizer;Tyler J. Wilhite;Ming Hui Chen;Powell L. Graham

  • Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample

    Khurshid R. Ghani;Shyam Sukumar;Jesse D. Sammon;Craig G. Rogers

  • Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    Evanguelos Xylinas;Evanguelos Xylinas;Michael Rink;Michael Rink;Eugene K. Cha;Thomas Clozel

  • Accuracy of the EORTC risk tables and of the CUETO scoring model to predict outcomes in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

    E. Xylinas;M. Kent;L. Kluth;L. Kluth;A. Pycha

  • Propensity-Matched Comparison of Morbidity and Costs of Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomies: A Contemporary Population-Based Analysis in the United States

    Jeffrey J. Leow;Stephen W. Reese;Wei Jiang;Stuart R. Lipsitz

  • Survival Analyses of Patients With Metastatic Renal Cancer Treated With Targeted Therapy With or Without Cytoreductive Nephrectomy: A National Cancer Data Base Study

    Nawar Hanna;Maxine Sun;Christian P. Meyer;Paul L. Nguyen

  • A Systematic Review of the Volume–Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy

    Quoc Dien Trinh;Anders Bjartell;Stephen J. Freedland;Brent K. Hollenbeck

  • Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database.

    Jeffrey J. Leow;Steven L. Chang;Christian P. Meyer;Ye Wang

  • Low CAIX expression and absence of VHL gene mutation are associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor survival of clear cell renal cell carcinoma

    Jean-Jacques Patard;Patricia Fergelot;Pierre I Karakiewicz;Tobias Klatte

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted and Open Radical Prostatectomy in the Postdissemination Era

    Giorgio Gandaglia;Jesse D. Sammon;Steven L. Chang;Toni K. Choueiri

  • Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Diagnoses During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Ziad Bakouny;Marco Paciotti;Andrew L. Schmidt;Stuart R. Lipsitz

  • C-reactive protein is an informative predictor of renal cell carcinoma-specific mortality: a European study of 313 patients.

    Pierre I. Karakiewicz;Georg C. Hutterer;Georg C. Hutterer;Quoc-Dien Trinh;Claudio Jeldres

  • Prediction of 90-day mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in a prospective European multicenter cohort

    Atiqullah Aziz;Matthias May;Maximilian Burger;Rein-Jüri Palisaar

  • Venous thromboembolism after major cancer surgery: temporal trends and patterns of care.

    Vincent Q. Trinh;Pierre I. Karakiewicz;Jesse Sammon;Maxine Sun

  • Prediction of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy: Development of a clinical decision-making tool

    Evanguelos Xylinas;Evanguelos Xylinas;Luis Kluth;Luis Kluth;Niccolo Passoni;Quoc Dien Trinh

  • Clinicians are poor raters of life-expectancy before radical prostatectomy or definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

    Jochen Walz;Andrea Gallina;Paul Perrotte;Claudio Jeldres

Frequent Co-Authors

Maxine Sun
Maxine Sun Harvard Medical School
Mani Menon
Mani Menon Henry Ford Hospital
Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz University of Montreal
Adam S. Kibel
Adam S. Kibel Brigham and Women's Hospital
Toni K. Choueiri
Toni K. Choueiri Harvard University
Paul L. Nguyen
Paul L. Nguyen Harvard Medical School
Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Christian Meyer
Christian Meyer Greifswald University Hospital
Stuart R. Lipsitz
Stuart R. Lipsitz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Paul Perrotte
Paul Perrotte University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine in the USA doesn’t always mean following the traditional medical school route. There are various online degree pathways suited for those seeking flexibility or aiming for specialized roles in healthcare.

For nurses aiming for leadership positions, a dnp program without clinical hours offers an efficient way to advance their expertise without the need for additional in-person clinical requirements. Aspiring practical nurses may be interested in a 9 month lpn program, allowing them to quickly start their careers.

Those drawn to mental health can explore the shortest pmhnp program to become a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner more rapidly. Alternatively, individuals interested in the organizational side of healthcare may benefit from a bachelors in healthcare administration, preparing them for roles in healthcare management and policy.

These online programs offer flexibility, affordability, and accelerated pathways, making a career in healthcare more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Quoc-Dien Trinh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles