World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
92
Citations
40869
World Ranking
540
National Ranking
291

Russell H. Taylor publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell H. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 618 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Russell H. Taylor D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell H. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Russell H. Taylor is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including Medicine, Engineering, and Computer Science. The scientist's work is notably concentrated in subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Aerospace Engineering.

The main topics covered by their research include Soft Robotics and Applications, Surgical Simulation and Training, Augmented Reality Applications, Anatomy and Medical Technology, Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization, Advanced Vision and Imaging, and Medical Imaging and Analysis.

The scientist has contributed to several recent papers, reflecting a broad engagement with emerging technologies and medical applications. Notable publications include:

  • Combating COVID-19-The role of robotics in managing public health and infectious diseases (2020, Science Robotics)
  • Revisiting Stereo Depth Estimation From a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformers (2021, 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision)
  • Accelerating Surgical Robotics Research: A Review of 10 Years With the da Vinci Research Kit (2021, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine)
  • Synthetic data accelerates the development of generalizable learning-based algorithms for X-ray image analysis (2023, Nature Machine Intelligence)
  • Concepts and Trends in Autonomy for Robot-Assisted Surgery (2022, Proceedings of the IEEE)

Frequent collaborators on their research projects include:

  • Mathias Unberath
  • Francis X. Creighton
  • Mehran Armand
  • Zhaoshuo Li
  • Manish Sahu

Russell H. Taylor's research has appeared frequently in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
  • IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Otolaryngology

In addition to journal and conference papers, Taylor has published books through Springer Science+Business Media. One known title is Imaging Systems for GI Endoscopy, and Graphs in Biomedical Image Analysis, published in 2022.

Best Publications

  • System for manipulating movement of a surgical instrument with computer controlled brake

    Russell Highsmith Taylor;Yong-yil Kim

  • Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery

    R.H. Taylor;D. Stoianovici

  • Automatic synthesis of fine-motion strategies for robots

    Tomás Lozano-pérez;Matthew T. Mason;Russell H. Taylor

  • The grand challenges of Science Robotics

    Guang Zhong Yang;Jim Bellingham;Pierre E. Dupont;Peer Fischer;Peer Fischer

  • Clouds, filaments and protostars: the Herschel Hi-GAL Milky Way

    S. Molinari;B. Swinyard;J. Bally;M. Barlow

  • A telerobotic assistant for laparoscopic surgery

    R.H. Taylor;J. Funda;B. Eldridge;S. Gomory

  • The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Sky Survey (VLASS). Science case and survey design

    M. Lacy;S.A. Baum;C.J. Chandler;S. Chatterjee

  • Medical robotics—Regulatory, ethical, and legal considerations for increasing levels of autonomy

    Guang Zhong Yang;James Cambias;Kevin Cleary;Eric Daimler

  • An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery

    R.H. Taylor;B.D. Mittelstadt;H.A. Paul;W. Hanson

  • Combating COVID-19-The role of robotics in managing public health and infectious diseases.

    Guang-Zhong Yang;Bradley J. Nelson;Robin R. Murphy;Howie Choset

  • An open-source research kit for the da Vinci® Surgical System

    Peter Kazanzides;Zihan Chen;Anton Deguet;Gregory S. Fischer

  • Planning and execution of straight line manipulator trajectories

    Russell H. Taylor

  • A dexterous system for laryngeal surgery

    N. Simaan;R. Taylor;P. Flint

  • Surgical data science for next-generation interventions.

    Lena Maier-Hein;Swaroop S. Vedula;Stefanie Speidel;Nassir Navab;Nassir Navab

  • Methods and apparatus for registering CT-scan data to multiple fluoroscopic images

    Andre Pierre Gueziec;Peter Kazanzides;Russell H. Taylor

  • Design and Integration of a Telerobotic System for Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Throat

    Nabil Simaan;Kai Xu;Wei Wei;Ankur Kapoor

  • Superfaces: polygonal mesh simplification with bounded error

    A.D. Kalvin;R.H. Taylor

  • Interactive user interfaces for minimally invasive telesurgical systems

    Simon P. DiMaio;Christopher J. Hasser;Russell H. Taylor;David Q. Larkin

  • Computer-Integrated Surgery: Technology and Clinical Applications

    Russell H. Taylor;Stephane Lavealle;Grigore C. Burdea;Ralph Mosges

  • Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control

    Binbin Wu;Francesco Ricchetti;Giuseppe Sanguineti;Misha Kazhdan

  • Augmented reality during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: toward real-time 3D-CT to stereoscopic video registration.

    Li Ming Su;Balazs P. Vagvolgyi;Rahul Agarwal;Carol E. Reiley

  • An Image-directed Robotic System For Precise Orthopaedic Surgery

    R.H. Taylor;H.A. Paul;B.D. Mittelstadt;W. Hanson

Frequent Co-Authors

Iulian Iordachita
Iulian Iordachita Johns Hopkins University
Gregory D. Hager
Gregory D. Hager Johns Hopkins University
Mehran Armand
Mehran Armand Johns Hopkins University
Peter Kazanzides
Peter Kazanzides Johns Hopkins University
Gabor Fichtinger
Gabor Fichtinger Queen's University
Emad M. Boctor
Emad M. Boctor Johns Hopkins University
Jin U. Kang
Jin U. Kang Johns Hopkins University
Nassir Navab
Nassir Navab Technical University of Munich
Louis L. Whitcomb
Louis L. Whitcomb Johns Hopkins University
Dan Stoianovici
Dan Stoianovici Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens a variety of flexible academic and career directions. Many students begin by considering an online associate's degree, which can provide foundational skills and quicker entry into tech fields. For those wanting to specialize or advance further, there are options to pursue the fastest masters degree online, allowing learners to earn an advanced credential in less time.

If return on investment is important, it’s helpful to focus on graduate degrees that are worth it, especially those aligned with high-demand tech careers. Additionally, there are various easy certifications that pay well which can boost your résumé and income potential without the commitment of a full degree program.

With a range of online degrees and certifications available, students and professionals can find educational pathways that match their goals, schedules, and budgets—paving the way for success in the dynamic tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Russell H. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles