World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Korea
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 6941 6529 14 13 1111 51153

Hyo-Soo Kim publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hyo-Soo Kim between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hyo-Soo Kim published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 31.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 88 publications in 2012. 16 of the 1,216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 88. Peak 88 publications in 2012. 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 23 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 33 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 33 publications 2010: 49 publications 2011: 70 publications 2012: 88 publications 2013: 68 publications 2014: 66 publications 2015: 58 publications 2016: 67 publications 2017: 55 publications 2018: 63 publications 2019: 50 publications 2020: 56 publications 2021: 68 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 46 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
1988 2026

1,216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hyo-Soo Kim: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 3
1989 0
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 10
1994 8
1995 14
1996 12
1997 14
1998 23
1999 17
2000 14
2001 9
2002 8
2003 18
2004 33
2005 18
2006 31
2007 25
2008 28
2009 33
2010 49
2011 70
2012 88
2013 68
2014 66
2015 58
2016 67
2017 55
2018 63
2019 50
2020 56
2021 68
2022 39
2023 46
2024 35
2025 15
2026 1
Total 1,216
Download as CSV

Hyo-Soo Kim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hyo-Soo Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,101–1,120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,111 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54 1,111
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Hyo-Soo Kim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hyo-Soo Kim sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Korea Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in Korea Leader Award

Overview

Hyo-Soo Kim is affiliated with Seoul National University Hospital in South Korea and has made substantial contributions to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their extensive publication record reflects a dedicated research career with over 551 works spanning related medical disciplines.

The main fields of study covered by their work include:

  • Medicine

Within this broad field, their subfields of study encompass:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Molecular Biology
  • Internal Medicine

Their research topics span critical areas in cardiovascular health, with a clear focus on interventions and diagnostics. Key topics include:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Hyo-Soo Kim has collaborated with several frequent coauthors, indicating established research partnerships. Prominent collaborators include:

  • Bon-Kwon Koo
  • Jeehoon Kang
  • Kyung Woo Park
  • Jung-Kyu Han
  • Hyun-Jae Kang

Their work has been published primarily in distinguished journals within the cardiovascular and medical research communities. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Korean Circulation Journal
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Some recent representative papers authored or coauthored by Hyo-Soo Kim are:

  • "Aspirin versus clopidogrel for chronic maintenance monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (HOST-EXAM): an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre trial," 2021, The Lancet
  • "Polymer-based or Polymer-free Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Prasugrel-based de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS): an open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority randomised trial," 2020, The Lancet
  • "Ten-Year Outcomes After Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Disease," 2020, Circulation
  • "P2Y12 Inhibitor or Aspirin Monotherapy for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Events," 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • Assessment of mitral annulus velocity by Doppler tissue imaging in the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function.

    Dae-Won Sohn;In-Ho Chai;Dong-Jun Lee;Hee-Chan Kim

  • Large-scale association analysis identifies new risk loci for coronary artery disease

    Panos Deloukas;Stavroula Kanoni;Christina Willenborg;Martin Farrall

  • Characterization of Two Types of Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Their Different Contributions to Neovasculogenesis

    Jin Hur;Chang Hwan Yoon;Hyo-Soo Kim;Jin Ho Choi

  • Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms : Results From the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) Study

    Bonkwon Koo;Andrejs Erglis;Joon Hyung Doh;David V. Daniels

  • Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilised with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and restenosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction: the MAGIC cell randomised clinical trial

    Hyun-Jae Kang;Hyo-Soo Kim;Shu-Ying Zhang;Kyung-Woo Park

  • Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

    Philip Urban;Roxana Mehran;Roisin Colleran;Dominick J. Angiolillo

  • Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials

    Francesco Costa;Francesco Costa;Francesco Costa;David van Klaveren;David van Klaveren;Stefan James;Dik Heg

  • Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis

    Tullio Palmerini;Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai;Diego Della Riva;Christoph Stettler

  • Synergistic neovascularization by mixed transplantation of early endothelial progenitor cells and late outgrowth endothelial cells: the role of angiogenic cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases.

    Chang Hwan Yoon;Jin Hur;Kyung Woo Park;Ji Hyun Kim

  • Six-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents The Efficacy of Xience/Promus Versus Cypher to Reduce Late Loss After Stenting (EXCELLENT) Randomized, Multicenter Study

    Hyeon Cheol Gwon;Joo Yong Hahn;Kyung Woo Park;Young Bin Song

  • Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease.

    Seung Jung Park;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park;Sung Cheol Yun

  • Impact of intracoronary cell therapy on left ventricular function in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.

    Michael J. Lipinski;Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai;Antonio Abbate;Reena Khianey

  • Darapladib for preventing ischemic events in stable coronary heart disease.

    Harvey D. White;Claes Held;Ralph Stewart;Elizabeth Tarka

  • Stents versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

    Ki Bae Seung;Duk-Woo Park;Young-Hak Kim;Seung-Whan Lee

  • Impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data.

    Somjot S. Brar;Jurrien ten Berg;Rossella Marcucci;Matthew J. Price

  • Mortality in patients treated with extended duration dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation: a pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised trials

    Tullio Palmerini;Umberto Benedetto;Letizia Bacchi-Reggiani;Diego Della Riva

  • Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

    Sung Han Yoon;Sabine Bleiziffer;Ole De Backer;Victoria Delgado

  • Pre-Treatment of Mesenchymal Stem Cells With a Combination of Growth Factors Enhances Gap Junction Formation, Cytoprotective Effect on Cardiomyocytes, and Therapeutic Efficacy for Myocardial Infarction

    Joo-Yong Hahn;Hyun-Ju Cho;Hyun-Jae Kang;Hyun-Jae Kang;Tack-Seung Kim

  • Physiologic Assessment of Jailed Side Branch Lesions Using Fractional Flow Reserve

    Bon-Kwon Koo;Hyun-Jai Kang;Tae-Jin Youn;In-Ho Chae

  • Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study.

    Jung Min Ahn;Jae Hyung Roh;Young Hak Kim;Duk Woo Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Bon-Kwon Koo
Bon-Kwon Koo Seoul National University Hospital
Byung Hee Oh
Byung Hee Oh Seoul National University Hospital
Yangsoo Jang
Yangsoo Jang Yonsei University
Seung-Jung Park
Seung-Jung Park University of Ulsan
Marco Valgimigli
Marco Valgimigli University of Bern
Gregg W. Stone
Gregg W. Stone Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jin Hur
Jin Hur Sejong University
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Alaide Chieffo
Alaide Chieffo Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Young-Hak Kim
Young-Hak Kim Asan Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your career in medicine doesn’t always require a traditional MD path. Flexible online degrees make it possible to gain specialized skills and credentials from anywhere. For example, a healthcare administration degree online accredited program can prepare you for key leadership and management roles in hospitals or clinics, with curriculum focused on policy, ethics, and healthcare operations.

Registered nurses seeking to step up in patient care may consider rn to np bridge programs. These flexible online options let practicing nurses earn master’s credentials and become nurse practitioners without putting their careers on hold.

If you have an interest in the science of food, nutrition degrees online provide a foundation in health, wellness, and dietetics. This path can lead to rewarding roles as a nutritionist or health educator.

For those drawn to healthcare management, top online mha programs that are cahme accredited offer advanced training in healthcare leadership and systems management, paving the way to executive and administrative positions within the industry.

Best Scientists Citing Hyo-Soo Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles