World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Claus G. Sørensen

Claus G. Sørensen

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
7390
World Ranking
5541
National Ranking
65

Claus G. Sørensen publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus G. Sørensen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 200 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Claus G. Sørensen D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claus G. Sørensen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claus G. Sørensen is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their research output spans multiple aspects of agricultural and biological sciences, with significant contributions in engineering fields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Engineering

Within these fields, key subfields of study are:

  • Plant Science
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mathematical Physics
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas relevant to modern agriculture and engineering:

  • Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
  • Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Advanced Algebra and Geometry
  • Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact

Recent published papers by Claus G. Sørensen include:

  • Internet of Things in arable farming: Implementation, applications, challenges and potential, 2020, Biosystems Engineering
  • Agricultural Workforce Crisis in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, Sustainability
  • Mobile Robotics in Agricultural Operations: A Narrative Review on Planning Aspects, 2020, Applied Sciences
  • Scenarios for European agricultural policymaking in the era of digitalisation, 2021, Agricultural Systems
  • Orchard Mapping with Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation, 2021, Sensors

They frequently collaborate with several co-authors, including:

  • Dionysis Bochtis
  • Simon Pearson
  • Dimitrios Katerıs
  • Mahdi Vahdanjoo
  • Michael Nørremark

The scientist's work appears regularly in well-known publication venues, such as:

  • Agronomy
  • AgriEngineering
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Sustainability
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Conceptual model of a future farm management information system

    C. G. Sørensen;S. Fountas;E. Nash;L. Pesonen

  • Farm management information systems

    S. Fountas;G. Carli;C.G. Sørensen;Z. Tsiropoulos

  • Internet of Things in arable farming: Implementation, applications, challenges and potential

    Andrés Villa-Henriksen;Gareth T.C. Edwards;Liisa A. Pesonen;Ole Green

  • Assessing sustainability at farm-level : Lessons learned from a comparison of tools in practice

    Evelien M. de Olde;Evelien M. de Olde;Frank W. Oudshoorn;Claus A.G. Sørensen;Eddie A.M. Bokkers

  • Advances in agricultural machinery management: A review

    Dionysis D. Bochtis;Claus Grøn Sørensen;Patrizia Busato

  • Robotics and labour in agriculture. A context consideration

    Vasso Marinoudi;Claus G. Sørensen;Simon Pearson;Dionysis Bochtis

  • Conceptual model of fleet management in agriculture

    C.G. Sørensen;D.D. Bochtis

  • The vehicle routing problem in field logistics part I

    D.D. Bochtis;C.G. Sørensen

  • Farmer Experience with Precision Agriculture in Denmark and the US Eastern Corn Belt

    S. Fountas;S. Blackmore;D. Ess;S. Hawkins

  • When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture

    Evelien M. de Olde;Evelien M. de Olde;Henrik Moller;Fleur Marchand;Richard W. McDowell;Richard W. McDowell

  • Farm machinery management information system

    S. Fountas;C.G. Sorensen;Z. Tsiropoulos;C. Cavalaris

  • Agricultural Sustainability: A Review of Concepts and Methods

    Maria G. Lampridi;Claus G. Sørensen;Dionysis Bochtis

  • A Future Internet Collaboration Platform for Safe and Healthy Food from Farm to Fork

    Sjaak Wolfert;Daan Goense;Claus Aage Grøn Sørensen

  • Original papers: Functional requirements for a future farm management information system

    C. G. Sørensen;L. Pesonen;D. D. Bochtis;S. G. Vougioukas

  • Controlled traffic farming: A review of the environmental impacts

    Vicent Gasso;Claus A.G. Sørensen;Frank W. Oudshoorn;Ole Green

  • An Optimized Field Coverage Planning Approach for Navigation of Agricultural Robots in Fields Involving Obstacle Areas

    Ibahim Hameed;Dionysis Bochtis;Claus Aage Grøn Sørensen

  • Monitoring and modeling temperature variations inside silage stacks using novel wireless sensor networks

    Ole Green;Esmaeil S. Nadimi;Victoria Blanes-Vidal;Rasmus N. Jørgensen

  • Energy inputs and GHG emissions of tillage systems

    Claus G. Sørensen;Niels Halberg;Frank W. Oudshoorn;Bjørn M. Petersen

  • Nutrient recovery by solid-liquid separation and methane productivity of solids.

    H. B. Moller;J. D. Hansen;C. A. G. Sorensen

  • In-field and inter-field path planning for agricultural transport units

    Martin Andreas Falk Jensen;Dionysis Bochtis;Claus GrøN SøRensen;Morten Rufus Blas

Frequent Co-Authors

Dionysis Bochtis
Dionysis Bochtis Aarhus University
Ibrahim A. Hameed
Ibrahim A. Hameed NTNU Technology Transfer (Norway)
Lars J. Munkholm
Lars J. Munkholm Aarhus University
Bruno Basso
Bruno Basso Michigan State University
Henrik Moller
Henrik Moller University of Otago
Sven G. Sommer
Sven G. Sommer Aarhus University
Wouter Saeys
Wouter Saeys KU Leuven
Eddie A.M. Bokkers
Eddie A.M. Bokkers Wageningen University & Research
Nicholas M. Holden
Nicholas M. Holden University College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology can open doors to a wide variety of rewarding careers. However, many students also find value in complementary online degrees that expand their skillset and potential career paths. For example, a master degree in human resources can be a powerful asset for those interested in leading technical teams or overseeing talent in tech-focused organizations.

Communication skills are just as vital in the engineering sector. An online masters in communications can help professionals effectively share complex technical information to diverse audiences, improving teamwork and project outcomes.

For individuals with entrepreneurial ambitions, finding the best mba for entrepreneurship can lead to new ventures in tech startups or innovation-driven enterprises. Many programs offer flexibility to learn key business skills online, which can fit around a demanding engineering career.

Accessible options like enrolling in an online mba no gmat have also made it easier for engineering professionals to upskill without standardized test barriers. These pathways can broaden career horizons and prepare students for leadership roles in a rapidly changing industry.

Best Scientists Citing Claus G. Sørensen

Trending Scientists