World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 40 5972 5762 70 65 145 10797

Henrik Moller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henrik Moller between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henrik Moller published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2009. 7 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2009. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 3 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 6 publications 2026: 1 publication
1989 2026

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henrik Moller: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 0
1991 4
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 3
1996 6
1997 6
1998 4
1999 6
2000 4
2001 1
2002 0
2003 2
2004 3
2005 2
2006 5
2007 13
2008 13
2009 20
2010 4
2011 3
2012 7
2013 5
2014 5
2015 9
2016 7
2017 4
2018 0
2019 3
2020 2
2021 3
2022 8
2023 20
2024 9
2025 6
2026 1
Total 191
Download as CSV

Henrik Moller publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henrik Moller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–146 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 145 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262 145
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Henrik Moller D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henrik Moller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280 40
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Henrik Moller is affiliated with the University of Otago in New Zealand and has a focused research portfolio primarily within the field of Medicine, with a substantial emphasis on Oncology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Economics and Econometrics, Molecular Biology, and General Health Professions.

Their research topics prominently cover areas such as Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection, various aspects of Lung Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Mutations, Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment, and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer.

Henrik Moller has contributed to multiple publications across various journals and venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Acta Oncologica
  • eLife
  • British Journal of General Practice
  • PLoS ONE

Some recent publications associated with their research are:

  • Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial (YLST): protocol for a randomised controlled trial to evaluate invitation to community-based low-dose CT screening for lung cancer versus usual care in a targeted population at risk, 2020, BMJ Open
  • Association between use of urgent suspected cancer referral and mortality and stage at diagnosis: a 5-year national cohort study, 2020, British Journal of General Practice
  • The incidence of major subtypes of primary brain tumors in adults in England 1995-2017, 2021, Neuro-Oncology
  • Participation in community-based lung cancer screening: the Yorkshire Lung Screening Trial, 2022, European Respiratory Journal
  • Cancer detection via primary care urgent referral and association with practice characteristics: a retrospective cross-sectional study in England from 2009/2010 to 2018/2019, 2021, British Journal of General Practice

Henrik Moller's frequent co-authors reflect collaboration primarily with:

  • Jens Winther Jensen
  • Tina Bech Olesen
  • Henry Jensen
  • Berit Andersen
  • Hiba A. Wanis

Best Publications

  • The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people

    Sandra Díaz;Sebsebe Demissew;Julia Carabias;Carlos Joly

  • Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-Management

    Henrik Moller;Fikret Berkes;Philip O'Brian Lyver;Mina Kislalioglu

  • Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources across the Pacific Ocean in an endless summer.

    Scott A. Shaffer;Yann Tremblay;Henri Weimerskirch;Darren Scott

  • Assessing a farm's sustainability: insights from resilience thinking.

    Ika Darnhofer;John Fairweather;Henrik Moller

  • Intensification and diversification of New Zealand agriculture since 1960: An evaluation of current indicators of land use change

    Catriona J. MacLeod;Henrik Moller

  • Lessons for invasion theory from social insects

    Henrik Moller

  • CALIBRATION OF TUNNEL TRACKING RATES TO ESTIMATE RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF SHIP RATS (RATTUS RATTUS) AND MICE (MUS MUSCULUS) IN A NEW ZEALAND FOREST

    H. Moller;J. Innes;N. Alterio

  • Competition, coexistence, and adaptation amongst rodent invaders to Pacific and New Zealand islands

    Yoram Yom-Tov;Yoram Yom-Tov;Shlomith Yom-Tov;Henrik Moller

  • Co-management of New Zealand's conservation estate by Maori and Pakeha: a review

    Todd Taiepa;Philip Lyver;Peter Horsley;Jane Davis

  • When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture

    Evelien M. de Olde;Evelien M. de Olde;Henrik Moller;Fleur Marchand;Richard W. McDowell;Richard W. McDowell

  • Identifying predators at nests of small birds in a New Zealand forest

    K. P. Brown;H. Moller;J. Innes;P. Jansen

  • Can PVA models using computer packages offer useful conservation advice? Sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus in New Zealand as a case study

    S. Hamilton;H. Moller

  • Intensification of New Zealand agriculture: Implications for biodiversity

    Henrik Moller;Catriona J. MacLeod;Julia Haggerty;Chris Rosin

  • Spatiotemporal habitat use by breeding sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus

    Scott A. Shaffer;Henri Weimerskirch;Darren Scott;David Pinaud

  • Guidelines for cross‐cultural Participatory Action Research partnerships: A case study of a customary seabird harvest in New Zealand

    Henrik Moller;Philip O'b Lyver;Corey Bragg;Jamie Newman

  • Cross‐cultural environmental research and management: Challenges and progress

    Janet Stephenson;Henrik Moller

  • Nutrient recovery by solid-liquid separation and methane productivity of solids.

    H. B. Moller;J. D. Hansen;C. A. G. Sorensen

  • The impact of common and German wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) on the New Zealand beekeeping industry

    B.K. Clapperton;P.A. Alspach;H. Moller;A.G. Matheson

  • Distribution and response of rats Rattus rattus, R. exulans to seedfall in New Zealand beech forests

    Carolyn M. King;Henrik Moller

  • Local people see and care most? Severe depletion of inshore fisheries and its consequences for Māori communities in New Zealand

    Alaric Mccarthy;Chris Hepburn;Nigel Scott;Katja Schweikert

Frequent Co-Authors

David F. Fletcher
David F. Fletcher University of Sydney
Jacqueline R. Beggs
Jacqueline R. Beggs University of Auckland
Sven G. Sommer
Sven G. Sommer Aarhus University
Claus G. Sørensen
Claus G. Sørensen Aarhus University
Scott A. Shaffer
Scott A. Shaffer San Jose State University
David R. Towns
David R. Towns Auckland University of Technology
Yann Tremblay
Yann Tremblay Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
Yoram Yom-Tov
Yoram Yom-Tov Tel Aviv University
Henri Weimerskirch
Henri Weimerskirch Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, a range of online degree options and flexible career pathways can help you achieve your goals. Many choose to start their educational journey at the undergraduate or graduate level, with some even transitioning from related fields like nursing through online bsn programs that emphasize science and research skills.

If quality and integrity are top priorities, consider enrolling in one of the not for profit online colleges. These institutions are accredited and often offer robust programs in environmental science, biology, and related fields without a profit-driven focus.

For those serving in the military or veterans seeking flexible learning, several of the best military friendly colleges provide tailored support, generous transfer credits, and remote study options—making it easier to balance academic and service commitments.

Additionally, students exploring interdisciplinary connections may find value in the social work master programs online. These degrees can lead to impactful careers that blend environmental stewardship with community advocacy and social justice.

Best Scientists Citing Henrik Moller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles