World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 40 8052 7738 2880 2682 101 6589

Peter M. Brown publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter M. Brown between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter M. Brown published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 2 of the 106 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1982 2025

106 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter M. Brown: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 3
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 4
2002 1
2003 0
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 5
2011 7
2012 3
2013 5
2014 13
2015 2
2016 5
2017 4
2018 4
2019 5
2020 1
2021 3
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 106
Download as CSV

Peter M. Brown publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Brown sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 101 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 101
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter M. Brown D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter M. Brown sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321 40
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter M. Brown is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science, with contributions across several related subfields including global and planetary change, atmospheric science, ecology, nature and landscape conservation, and safety, risk, reliability, and quality.

Brown's recent publications address a range of topics such as fire effects on ecosystems, rangeland and wildlife management, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, tree-ring climate responses, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, advanced ceramic materials synthesis, and thermal properties of materials. Key publication venues where Brown has contributed include Ecological Applications, Tree Physiology, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, International Journal of Wildland Fire, and Tree-Ring Research.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Brown include:

  • Evidence for widespread changes in the structure, composition, and fire regimes of western North American forests (2021, Ecological Applications)
  • Bimodal cambial activity and false-ring formation in conifers under a monsoon climate (2021, Tree Physiology)
  • Thermal properties and performance of carbon fiber-based ultra-high temperature ceramic matrix composites (C f -UHTCMCs) (2020, Journal of the American Ceramic Society)
  • An analysis of fatalities from forest fires in China, 1951-2018 (2022, International Journal of Wildland Fire)
  • Fire History Across Forest Types in the Southern Beartooth Mountains, Wyoming (2020, Tree-Ring Research)

Frequent co-authors with whom Brown has collaborated include:

  • Jens T. Stevens
  • R. Keala Hagmann
  • Paul F. Hessburg
  • Susan J. Prichard
  • Nicholas A. Povak

Their main fields of study demonstrate a multidisciplinary approach, addressing complex environmental processes and interactions. The subfields of global and planetary change and atmospheric science feature prominently alongside ecological and conservation-oriented studies.

Brown has engaged extensively with topics related to fire's impact on ecosystems, underpinning much of their recent scholarly output. Their work also spans studies on vegetation dynamics, wildlife management, and the physiological responses of trees to climate variations through tree-ring analysis. Additionally, Brown's research extends to materials science, investigating thermal properties and advanced ceramic composites.

Best Publications

  • Historical and Modern Disturbance Regimes, Stand Structures, and Landscape Dynamics in Piñon–Juniper Vegetation of the Western United States

    William H. Romme;Craig D. Allen;John D. Bailey;William L. Baker

  • CLIMATE AND DISTURBANCE FORCING OF EPISODIC TREE RECRUITMENT IN A SOUTHWESTERN PONDEROSA PINE LANDSCAPE

    Peter M. Brown;Rosalind Wu

  • Contingent Pacific-Atlantic Ocean influence on multicentury wildfire synchrony over western North America.

    Thomas Kitzberger;Peter M. Brown;Emily K. Heyerdahl;Thomas W. Swetnam

  • Long-term, landscape patterns of past fire events in a montane ponderosa pine forest of central Colorado

    Peter M. Brown;Merrill R. Kaufmann;Wayne D. Shepperd

  • The role of climate in a pine forest regeneration pulse in the southwestern United States

    Melissa Savage;Peter M. Brown;Johannes Feddema

  • Multi‐scale controls of historical forest‐fire regimes: new insights from fire‐scar networks

    Donald A Falk;Emily K Heyerdahl;Peter M Brown;Calvin Farris

  • Tamm Review: Management of mixed-severity fire regime forests in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California

    Paul F. Hessburg;Thomas A. Spies;David A. Perry;Carl N. Skinner

  • A cross-dated fire history from coast redwood near Redwood National Park, California

    Peter M. Brown;Thomas W. Swetnam

  • Climate change impacts on fire regimes and key ecosystem services in Rocky Mountain forests

    Monique E. Rocca;Peter M. Brown;Lee H. MacDonald;Christian M. Carrico

  • Heterogeneity in ponderosa pine/Douglas-fir forests: age and size structure in unlogged and logged landscapes of central Colorado

    Merrill R Kaufmann;Claudia M Regan;Peter M Brown

  • Fire history in interior ponderosa pine communities of the Black Hills, South Dakota, USA

    Peter M. Brown;Carolyn Hull Sieg

  • CLIMATE EFFECTS ON FIRE REGIMES AND TREE RECRUITMENT IN BLACK HILLS PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS

    Peter M. Brown

  • Historical variability in fire at the ponderosa pine - Northern Great Plains prairie ecotone, southeastern Black Hills, South Dakota

    Peter M. Brown;Carolyn Hull Sieg

  • Drought frequency in central California since 101 B.C. recorded in giant sequoia tree rings

    Malcolm K Hughes;Peter M Brown

  • Fire history along environmental gradients in the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico: influences of local patterns and regional processes.

    Peter M. Brown;Margot W. Kaye;Laurie S. Huckaby;Christopher H. Baisan

  • Fire and forest history at Mount Rushmore.

    Peter M. Brown;Cody L. Wienk;Amy J. Symstad

  • Multi-Millennial Fire History of the Giant Forest, Sequoia National Park, California, USA

    Thomas W. Swetnam;Christopher H. Baisan;Anthony C. Caprio;Peter M. Brown

  • Unsupported inferences of high-severity fire in historical dry forests of the western United States: Response to Williams and Baker

    Peter Z. Fulé;Thomas W. Swetnam;Peter M. Brown;Donald A. Falk

  • Was Aldo Leopold Right about the Kaibab Deer Herd

    Dan Binkley;Margaret M. Moore;William H. Romme;Peter M. Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas W. Swetnam
Thomas W. Swetnam University of Arizona
Donald A. Falk
Donald A. Falk University of Arizona
Peter Z. Fulé
Peter Z. Fulé Northern Arizona University
Michael Battaglia
Michael Battaglia Agriculture and Food
William H. Romme
William H. Romme Colorado State University
Alan H. Taylor
Alan H. Taylor Pennsylvania State University
Scott L. Stephens
Scott L. Stephens University of California, Berkeley
Brandon T. Bestelmeyer
Brandon T. Bestelmeyer Agricultural Research Service
Malcolm K. Hughes
Malcolm K. Hughes University of Arizona
Neil Pederson
Neil Pederson Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can expand career opportunities and provide specialized knowledge. Programs such as dsw programs emphasize social work's impact on environmental justice and community health, integrating scientific and social perspectives.

Additionally, those seeking a flexible and broad foundation might consider a budget friendly online general studies degree. This option allows students to customize coursework across various disciplines, including environmental policy, science, and sustainability.

For learners seeking less intensive study routes, exploring the easiest bachelors degree programs can offer a manageable pathway to gaining relevant skills while balancing other commitments. These programs often prioritize accessible coursework without compromising educational quality.

Furthermore, aspiring environmental scientists can deepen their understanding through specialized degrees like geology degrees online. This focus on earth sciences complements environmental studies by providing insights into natural processes affecting ecosystems and natural resources.

Best Scientists Citing Peter M. Brown

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles