World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
69
Citations
26419
World Ranking
1737
National Ranking
730

Malcolm K. Hughes publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm K. Hughes sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 211 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Malcolm K. Hughes D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm K. Hughes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1998 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Malcolm K. Hughes is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research is primarily focused in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with specific expertise in Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change. Their work also touches upon Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation as subfields.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad spectrum related to climate and environmental studies. Key areas of work include:

  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Climate variability and models
  • Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Cryospheric studies and observations

Malcolm K. Hughes has contributed to multiple publications across several journals and venues, including:

  • Dendrochronologia
  • Nature Communications
  • Tree Physiology
  • Science Bulletin
  • Quaternary Science Reviews

Significant recent papers include:

  • "Prominent role of volcanism in Common Era climate variability and human history" (2020) published in Dendrochronologia
  • "The influence of decision-making in tree ring-based climate reconstructions" (2021) published in Nature Communications
  • "An interpreted language implementation of the Vaganov-Shashkin tree-ring proxy system model" (2020) published in Dendrochronologia
  • "Bimodal cambial activity and false-ring formation in conifers under a monsoon climate" (2021) published in Tree Physiology
  • "Global wood anatomical perspective on the onset of the Late Antique Little Ice Age (LALIA) in the mid-6th century CE" (2022) published in Science Bulletin

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ulf Büntgen
  • Olga V. Churakova
  • Alexander V. Kirdyanov
  • Vladimir S. Myglan
  • Еugene А. Vaganov

Throughout their career, Malcolm K. Hughes has received recognition from the scientific community, including:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), awarded in 2013
  • Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), awarded in 1998

Best Publications

  • Global Signatures and Dynamical Origins of the Little Ice Age and Medieval Climate Anomaly

    Michael E. Mann;Zhihua Zhang;Scott Rutherford;Raymond S. Bradley

  • Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries

    Michael E. Mann;Raymond S. Bradley;Malcolm K. Hughes

  • Northern Hemisphere Temperatures During the Past Millennium: Inferences, Uncertainties, and Limitations

    Michael E. Mann;Raymond S. Bradley;Malcolm K. Hughes

  • Proxy-based reconstructions of hemispheric and global surface temperature variations over the past two millennia

    Michael E. Mann;Zhihua Zhang;Malcolm K. Hughes;Raymond S. Bradley

  • A large carbon sink in the woody biomass of Northern forests

    R. B. Myneni;J. Dong;C. J. Tucker;R. K. Kaufmann

  • Was There a ‘Medieval Warm Period’, and if so, Where and When?

    Malcolm K. Hughes;Henry F. Diaz

  • Influence of snowfall and melt timing on tree growth in subarctic Eurasia

    E. A. Vaganov;M. K. Hughes;A. V. Kirdyanov;F. H. Schweingruber

  • The climate of the US Southwest

    Paul R. Sheppard;Andrew C. Comrie;Gregory D. Packin;Kurt Angersbach

  • Growth Dynamics of Conifer Tree Rings: Images of Past and Future Environments

    Alexander V. Shashkin;Eugene A. Vaganov;Malcolm K. Hughes

  • Remote sensing estimates of boreal and temperate forest woody biomass: carbon pools, sources, and sinks

    Jiarui Dong;Robert K. Kaufmann;Ranga B. Myneni;Compton J. Tucker

  • Climate in Medieval Time

    Raymond S. Bradley;Malcolm K. Hughes;Henry F. Diaz

  • Medieval drought in the upper Colorado River Basin

    David M. Meko;Connie A. Woodhouse;Christopher A. Baisan;Troy Knight

  • Recent unprecedented tree-ring growth in bristlecone pine at the highest elevations and possible causes

    Matthew W. Salzer;Malcolm K. Hughes;Andrew G. Bunn;Kurt F. Kipfmueller

  • Climate from Tree Rings

    M. K. Hughes

  • The importance of early summer temperature and date of snow melt for tree growth in the Siberian Subarctic

    Alexander Kirdyanov;Malcolm Hughes;Eugene Vaganov;Fritz Schweingruber

  • SACRAMENTO RIVER FLOW RECONSTRUCTED TO A.D. 869 FROM TREE RINGS1

    David M. Meko;Matthew D. Therrell;Matthew D. Therrell;Christopher H. Baisan;Christopher H. Baisan;Malcolm K. Hughes

  • Dendrochronology in climatology – the state of the art

    Malcolm K. Hughes

  • Tropical Pacific - mid-latitude teleconnections in medieval times

    Nicholas E. Graham;Nicholas E. Graham;Malcolm K. Hughes;Caspar M. Ammann;Kim M. Cobb

  • Proxy-Based Northern Hemisphere Surface Temperature Reconstructions: Sensitivity to Method, Predictor Network, Target Season, and Target Domain

    Scott Rutherford;Scott Rutherford;M. E. Mann;T. J. Osborn;R. S. Bradley

  • Reconstructing Summer Temperatures in Northern Fennoscandinavia Back to A.D. 1700 Using Tree-Ring Data from Scots Pine

    K. R. Briffa;P. D. Jones;J. R. Pilcher;M. K. Hughes

Frequent Co-Authors

Eugene A. Vaganov
Eugene A. Vaganov Siberian Federal University
Michael E. Mann
Michael E. Mann Pennsylvania State University
Raymond S. Bradley
Raymond S. Bradley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Elena Xoplaki
Elena Xoplaki University of Giessen
Alexander V. Kirdyanov
Alexander V. Kirdyanov University of Cambridge
Jürg Luterbacher
Jürg Luterbacher University of Giessen
Keith R. Briffa
Keith R. Briffa University of East Anglia
Michael N. Evans
Michael N. Evans University of Maryland, College Park
Kevin J. Anchukaitis
Kevin J. Anchukaitis University of Arizona
Ulf Büntgen
Ulf Büntgen University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their expertise beyond a bachelor's in Environmental Sciences, there are diverse online degree options available. Professionals seeking leadership roles in education might explore education doctoral programs without dissertation to further develop their skills without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Many educators also take advantage of an eds to edd bridge program which provides a streamlined pathway to doctoral credentials, enhancing their qualifications for administrative and policy-making positions.

For those interested in integrating social work with environmental advocacy, some choose affordable online doctoral degrees in social work. Online programs like online dsw programs in social work offer practical training emphasizing community development and social justice.

Entry-level professionals or career changers may also consider an online general studies bachelor degree cheap to build a broad educational foundation, which can be customized with environmental electives and serve as a gateway to specialized graduate studies.

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm K. Hughes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles