World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
11235
World Ranking
11429
National Ranking
4696

Melvin Fitting publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melvin Fitting sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 227 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Melvin Fitting D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melvin Fitting sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Melvin Fitting is affiliated with City University of New York in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on computer science, as well as psychology and arts and humanities. The main subfields of their work include artificial intelligence, computational theory and mathematics, experimental and cognitive psychology, philosophy, and language and linguistics.

Their publications contribute extensively to topics such as logic, reasoning, and knowledge; advanced algebra and logic; logic, programming, and type systems; semantic web and ontologies; philosophy and theoretical science; rough sets and fuzzy logic; and classical philosophy and thought.

Melvin Fitting's recent papers include:

  • A Family of Strict/Tolerant Logics (2020), Journal of Philosophical Logic
  • First-order justification logic with constant domain semantics (2020), Journal of Logic and Computation
  • Strict/Tolerant Logics Built Using Generalized Weak Kleene Logics (2021), The Australasian Journal of Logic
  • Simple Tableaus for Simple Logics (2024), Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
  • Strict/Tolerant Family Continued: Quantifiers and Modalities (2021), The Australasian Journal of Logic

Frequent coauthors include Richard L. Mendelsohn, Felipe Salvatore, Sergei Artëmov, John P. Burgess, and Anandi Hattiangadi.

Publication venues where Melvin Fitting's work has appeared multiple times are:

  • The Australasian Journal of Logic
  • Journal of Logic and Computation
  • Journal of Philosophical Logic
  • Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic
  • Bulletin of Symbolic Logic

Best Publications

  • First-Order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving

    Melvin Fitting;David Gries

  • Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics

    Melvin Chris Fitting

  • First-Order Modal Logic

    Melvin Fitting;Richard L. Mendelsohn

  • A kripke-kleene semantics for logic programs**

    Melvin Fitting

  • Bilattices and the semantics of logic programming

    Melvin Fitting

  • Intuitionistic logic, model theory and forcing

    Melvin Chris Fitting

  • Many-valued modal logics

    Melvin C. Fitting

  • The logic of proofs, semantically

    Melvin Fitting

  • First-Order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving

    Unknown

  • First-order logic and automated theorem proving (2nd ed.)

    Melvin Fitting

  • Fixpoint Semantics for Logic Programming A Survey

    Melvin Fitting;Melvin Fitting

  • Many-valued modal logics II

    Melvin Fitting

  • Kleene's three valued logics and their children

    Melvin Fitting

  • Basic modal logic

    Melvin Fitting

  • Kleene's Logic, Generalized

    Melvin Fitting

  • First-order modal tableaux

    Melvin Fitting;Melvin Fitting

  • Tableau methods of proof for modal logics.

    Melvin Fitting

  • Types, Tableaus, and Gödel's God

    Melvin Fitting

  • Bilattices in logic programming

    M. Fitting

  • The family of stable models

    Melvin Fitting

  • Bilattices and the theory of truth

    Melvin Fitting

  • Logic Programming on a Topological Bilattice1

    Melvin Fitting;Melvin Fitting

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrei Voronkov
Andrei Voronkov University of Manchester
Janusz Kacprzyk
Janusz Kacprzyk Systems Research Institute
David Gries
David Gries Cornell University
Ewa Orłowska
Ewa Orłowska Polish Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering Computer Science, you may also want to explore related online degrees that can broaden your skills and career options. Fields like electrical engineering have considerable overlap with computer science. See the best online electrical engineering programs USA for top recommendations that can complement your tech skill set.

For those seeking quick entry into the workforce, check out easy licenses and certifications to get. Many of these credentials are in high demand and can boost your job prospects without the time commitment of a full degree.

Interested in advancing your education rapidly? Look into the fastest masters degree online paths, which allow you to gain new expertise and credentials in under two years.

Finally, when planning your long-term career development, focus on the most in demand masters degrees. These programs open doors to high-growth roles in technology, management, and engineering.

Best Scientists Citing Melvin Fitting

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles