World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
7880
World Ranking
7234
National Ranking
352

André Platzer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where André Platzer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 204 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

André Platzer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where André Platzer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

André Platzer is affiliated with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Hardware and Architecture, Software, and Aerospace Engineering.

The main topics of André Platzer's work focus on Formal Methods in Verification, Logic, programming, and type systems, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, Security and Verification in Computing, Real-Time Systems Scheduling, Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms, and Polynomial and algebraic computation.

The scientist has authored numerous papers, including:

  • Verified Train Controllers for the Federal Railroad Administration Train Kinematics Model: Balancing Competing Brake and Track Forces, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • Does Every Computer Scientist Need to Know Formal Methods?, 2024, Formal Aspects of Computing
  • Formally Verified Next-generation Airborne Collision Avoidance Games in ACAS X, 2022, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • Safe and Resilient Practical Waypoint-Following for Autonomous Vehicles, 2021, IEEE Control Systems Letters
  • Structured Proofs for Adversarial Cyber-Physical Systems, 2021, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems

André Platzer has frequently published in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • Lecture notes in computer science
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Stefan Mitsch
  • Jonathan Laurent
  • Aditi Kabra
  • Marvin Brieger
  • Enguerrand Prebet

In the domain of scholarly books, André Platzer has published with the European Organization for Nuclear Research. The book titled "Logical Foundations of Cyber-Physical Systems" was published in 2021.

Recognition for their contributions includes the award of ACM Senior Member in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Differential Dynamic Logic for Hybrid Systems

    André Platzer

  • KeYmaera: A Hybrid Theorem Prover for Hybrid Systems (System Description)

    André Platzer;Jan-David Quesel

  • A Bayesian Approach to Model Checking Biological Systems

    Sumit K. Jha;Edmund M. Clarke;Christopher J. Langmead;Axel Legay

  • Logical Foundations of Cyber-Physical Systems

    André Platzer

  • KeYmaera X: An Axiomatic Tactical Theorem Prover for Hybrid Systems

    Nathan Fulton;Stefan Mitsch;Jan-David Quesel;Marcus Völp;Marcus Völp

  • Logical Analysis of Hybrid Systems

    André Platzer

  • Adaptive cruise control: hybrid, distributed, and now formally verified

    Sarah M. Loos;André Platzer;Ligia Nistor

  • Computing differential invariants of hybrid systems as fixedpoints

    André Platzer;Edmund M. Clarke

  • ModelPlex: verified runtime validation of verified cyber-physical system models

    Stefan Mitsch;André Platzer

  • European Train Control System: A Case Study in Formal Verification

    André Platzer;Jan-David Quesel

  • Safe Reinforcement Learning via Formal Methods: Toward Safe Control Through Proof and Learning

    Nathan Fulton;André Platzer

  • Differential-algebraic Dynamic Logic for Differential-algebraic Programs

    André Platzer

  • A Complete Uniform Substitution Calculus for Differential Dynamic Logic

    André Platzer

  • Bayesian statistical model checking with application to Simulink/Stateflow verification

    Paolo Zuliani;André Platzer;Edmund M. Clarke

  • Bayesian statistical model checking with application to Stateflow/Simulink verification

    Paolo Zuliani;André Platzer;Edmund M. Clarke

  • Statistical Model Checking for Markov Decision Processes

    David Henriques;Joao G. Martins;Paolo Zuliani;Andre Platzer

  • The Complete Proof Theory of Hybrid Systems

    Andre Platzer

  • Logics of Dynamical Systems

    Andre Platzer

  • Formal Verification of Curved Flight Collision Avoidance Maneuvers: A Case Study

    André Platzer;Edmund M. Clarke

  • Formal verification of obstacle avoidance and navigation of ground robots

    Stefan Mitsch;Khalil Ghorbal;Khalil Ghorbal;David Vogelbacher;David Vogelbacher;André Platzer

  • Adaptive Cruise Control: Hybrid, Distributed, and Now Formally Verified (CMU-CS-11-107)

    Sarah M. Loos;Andre Platzer;Ligia Nistor

Frequent Co-Authors

Edmund M. Clarke
Edmund M. Clarke Carnegie Mellon University
Bruce H. Krogh
Bruce H. Krogh Carnegie Mellon University
Geoffrey J. Gordon
Geoffrey J. Gordon Carnegie Mellon University
Werner Retschitzegger
Werner Retschitzegger Johannes Kepler University of Linz
David Garlan
David Garlan Carnegie Mellon University
Bradley Schmerl
Bradley Schmerl Carnegie Mellon University
Axel Legay
Axel Legay Université Catholique de Louvain
George J. Pappas
George J. Pappas University of Pennsylvania
Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog
Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Soummya Kar
Soummya Kar Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up a world of options for those interested in Computer Science. For students wanting a quick start, pursuing one of the best associate degrees online provides foundational knowledge and can lead to entry-level tech jobs in as little as six months.

Some students find that combining computer science with business creates even more career choices. If this sounds appealing, consider an online degree in business to build entrepreneurial skills or prepare for tech management roles.

Cost is another crucial factor for many learners. You can find a wide variety of affordable online bachelor's degree programs that let you earn a respected credential without breaking the bank.

Engineering is another related path, especially for those wanting a blend of hardware and software skills. Discover the online engineering degree cost options to make informed decisions about your education.

Each pathway offers unique advantages—choose one that aligns with your interests, goals, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing André Platzer

Trending Scientists