World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Nicholas Pinter publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Pinter sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Nicholas Pinter D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Pinter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

Nicholas Pinter is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on flood risk assessment, hydrology, disaster management, geology, and climate-related adaptation and migration issues.

Their work has been published in a variety of academic venues, including:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Geology
  • Nature Communications
  • Natural Hazards
  • Elementa Science of the Anthropocene

Pinter's publications encompass multiple subfields of study such as Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Atmospheric Science, Earth-Surface Processes, and Water Science and Technology.

The main topics explored in Pinter's research include:

  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Geological formations and processes
  • Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration

Notable recent publications by Nicholas Pinter include:

  • Assessing managed flood retreat and community relocation in the Midwest USA, 2021, Natural Hazards
  • The lost history of managed retreat and community relocation in the United States, 2021, Elementa Science of the Anthropocene

Other coauthored works relevant to flood risk and disaster analysis include:

  • New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Flood risk and residential real-estate prices: Evidence from three US counties, 2022, Journal of Flood Risk Management
  • Case Study: Reconstructing the 2015 Dulcepamba River Flood Disaster, 2020, Environmental and Engineering Geoscience

Pinter frequently collaborates with other researchers such as Ryan G. Miller, Margarita E. McInnis, Kang Yu, Levi Thaler, and Ivan Arturo Peña-Villa, contributing jointly to multiple publications on related topics.

Among honors, Nicholas Pinter has been recognized as a Fellow of the Geological Society of America.

Best Publications

  • Active Tectonics: Earthquakes, Uplift, and Landscape

    Edward A. Keller;Nicholas Pinter

  • Quaternary uplift astride the aseismic Cocos Ridge, Pacific coast, Costa Rica

    Thomas W. Gardner;David Verdonck;Nicholas M. Pinter;Rudy Slingerland

  • New insights into US flood vulnerability revealed from flood insurance big data

    Oliver E. J. Wing;Nicholas Pinter;Paul D. Bates;Carolyn Kousky

  • One Step Forward, Two Steps Back on U.S. Floodplains

    Nicholas Pinter

  • Hydrodynamic and morphodynamic response to river engineering documented by fixed-discharge analysis, Lower Missouri River, USA

    Nicholas Pinter;Reuben A. Heine

  • The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: A requiem

    Nicholas Pinter;Andrew C. Scott;Tyrone L. Daulton;Andrew Podoll

  • Flood trends and river engineering on the Mississippi River system

    Nicholas Pinter;Abebe A. Jemberie;Jonathan W. F. Remo;Reuben A. Heine

  • Levee effects upon flood levels: an empirical assessment

    Reuben A. Heine;Nicholas Pinter

  • Trends in flood risk management in deltas around the world: Are we going ‘soft’?

    A. Wesselink;J.F. Warner;M.A. Syed;F. Chan

  • Flood magnification on the River Rhine

    Nicholas Pinter;Rienk R. van der Ploeg;Peter Schweigert;Gunnar Hoefer

  • Hydrological signatures of flood trends on German rivers: Flood frequencies, flood heights and specific stages

    Helge Bormann;Nicholas Pinter;Simon Elfert

  • Hydraulic and flood-loss modeling of levee, floodplain, and river management strategies, Middle Mississippi River, USA

    Jonathan W. F. Remo;Megan Carlson;Nicholas Pinter

  • Impacts, mega-tsunami, and other extraordinary claims

    Nicholas Pinter;Scott E. Ishman

  • Fire and vegetation history on Santa Rosa Island, Channel Islands, and long-term environmental change in southern California†

    R. Scott Anderson;Scott Starratt;Renata M. Brunner Jass;Nicholas Pinter

  • HOW EROSION BUILDS MOUNTAINS

    Nicholas Pinter;Mark T. Brandon

  • Trends in flood stages: Contrasting results from the Mississippi and Rhine River systems

    Nicholas Pinter;Brian S. Ickes;Joseph H. Wlosinski;Rienk R. van der Ploeg

  • The use of retro- and scenario-modeling to assess effects of 100+ years river of engineering and land-cover change on Middle and Lower Mississippi River flood stages

    Jonathan W.F. Remo;Nicholas Pinter;Reuben Heine

  • Fire and vegetation shifts in the Americas at the vanguard of Paleoindian migration

    Nicholas Pinter;Stuart Fiedel;Jon E. Keeley;Jon E. Keeley

  • The Adria Microplate: GPS Geodesy, Tectonics and Hazards

    Nicholas Pinter;Gyula Grenerczy;John Weber;Seth Stein

  • Retro-modeling the Middle Mississippi River

    Jonathan W.F. Remo;Nicholas Pinter

  • Assessing flood hazard on dynamic rivers

    Nicholas Pinter;Russell Thomas;Joseph H. Wlosinski

  • Fungus, not comet or catastrophe, accounts for carbonaceous spherules in the Younger Dryas “impact layer”

    Andrew C. Scott;Nicholas Pinter;Margaret E. Collinson;Mark Hardiman

  • The Adria Microplate: GPS Geodesy, Tectonics and Hazards: Nato Science Series

    N Pinter;G Grenerczy;J Weber;Seth Stein

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew C. Scott
Andrew C. Scott Royal Holloway University of London
R. Scott Anderson
R. Scott Anderson Northern Arizona University
Mark T. Brandon
Mark T. Brandon Yale University
Paul D Bates
Paul D Bates University of Bristol
Edward A. Keller
Edward A. Keller University of California, Santa Barbara
Donald K. Grayson
Donald K. Grayson University of Washington
Patrick J. Bartlein
Patrick J. Bartlein University of Oregon
Seth Stein
Seth Stein Northwestern University
Cathy Whitlock
Cathy Whitlock Montana State University
G. Mathias Kondolf
G. Mathias Kondolf University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA can open doors to diverse career paths, including environmental consulting, geospatial analysis, and natural resource management. Many students complement their Earth Science knowledge with related fields to broaden their career prospects.

For those interested in data management and research, pursuing a is a masters in library science worth it program can enhance skills in organizing scientific information and datasets. Such expertise is invaluable in academic, government, and corporate settings.

Visual documentation plays a key role in Earth Science through photography and imaging technologies. Students can find affordable options by researching photography colleges online, perfect for developing skills to capture and analyze environmental changes.

Veterans seeking flexible education paths often benefit from specialized programs like the online photography bachelor degree for veterans, which supports skill-building applicable to Earth Science documentation roles.

Additionally, language skills are highly valued in global scientific collaborations. A bachelors in spanish online can equip Earth Science professionals to engage with Spanish-speaking communities and research teams worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Pinter

Trending Scientists