World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4880
World Ranking
13540
National Ranking
653

Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 185 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog is affiliated with the Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg in Germany. Their academic contributions primarily lie within the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, covering a total of 58 publications in computer science and 7 in social sciences.

Their research spans several subfields, including:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Software

Olderog's main topics of work consist of:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling
  • Access Control and Trust
  • Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

The scientist has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Solving high-level Petri games, 2020, Acta Informatica
  • Global Winning Conditions in Synthesis of Distributed Systems with Causal Memory, 2023, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • AdamMC: A Model Checker for Petri Nets with Transits against Flow-LTL (Full Version), 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Model Checking Branching Properties on Petri Nets with Transits (Full Version), 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Correction to: Solving high-level Petri games, 2021, Acta Informatica

Olderog's work has been published across several key venues, such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Acta Informatica
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • it - Information Technology

Frequent collaborators in research include Bernd Finkbeiner, Manuel Gieseking, Jesko Hecking-Harbusch, Krzysztof R. Apt, and Nick Würdemann. They have jointly contributed to multiple scholarly outputs documented in various publications.

In addition to articles, Olderog has contributed to the literature with a book titled "Model Checking, Synthesis, and Learning," published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021.

Recognition includes membership in the Academia Europaea since 2012.

Best Publications

  • Verification of Sequential and Concurrent Programs

    R. Apt Krzysztof;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog

  • Specification-oriented semantics for communicating processes

    E R Olderog;C A R Hoare

  • Verification of sequential and concurrent programs

    K.R. Apt;E.R. Olderog

  • Verification of sequential and concurrent programs (2nd ed.)

    Krzysztof R. Apt;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog

  • Operational Petri net semantics for CCSP

    Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog

  • Nets, terms and formulas

    E.-R. Olderog

  • Provably Correct Systems

    He Jifeng;C. A. R. Hoare;Martin Fränzle;Markus Müller-Olm

  • Proof rules and transformations dealing with fairness

    Krzysztof R. Apt;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog

  • Readies and failures in the algebra of communicating processes

    J. A. Bergstra;J. W. Klop;E.-R. Olderrog

  • Correct System Design, Recent Insight and Advances, (to Hans Langmaack on the occasion of his retirement from his professorship at the University of Kiel)

    Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog;Bernhard Steffen

  • Failures without chaos : a new process model for fair abstraction

    J.A. Bergstra;J.W. Klop;E.-R. Olderog

  • Failures without chaos: a new process semantics for fair abstraction

    Jan A. Bergstra;Jan Willem Klop;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog

  • An abstract model for proving safety of multi-lane traffic manoeuvres

    Martin Hilscher;Sven Linker;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog;Anders P. Ravn

  • Fairness in parallel programs: the transformational approach

    Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog;Krzysztof R. Apt

  • Verification of cooperating traffic agents

    W. Damm;H. Hungar;E.-R. Olderog

  • On the notion of expressiveness and the rule of adaptation

    Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog

  • Contrasting themes in the semantics of imperative concurrency

    J W de Bakker;J N Kok;J-J Ch Meyer;E R Olderog

  • Specification-Oriented Semantics for Communicating Processes

    Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog;C. A. R. Hoare;C. A. R. Hoare

  • Nets, Terms and Formulas: Three Views of Concurrent Processes and their Relationship

    E.-R. Olderog

  • A CSP View on UML-RT Structure Diagrams

    Clemens Fischer;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog;Heike Wehrheim

  • CSP-OZ-DC: a combination of specification techniques for processes, data and time

    Jochen Hoenicke;Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog

  • Arbeitspapiere der GMD 320

    Ernst-Rudiger Olderog;Ursula Goltz;Rob van Glabbeek

Frequent Co-Authors

Krzysztof R. Apt
Krzysztof R. Apt Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Bernd Finkbeiner
Bernd Finkbeiner Saarland University
C. A. R. Hoare
C. A. R. Hoare Microsoft (United States)
Andreas Podelski
Andreas Podelski University of Freiburg
Jan A. Bergstra
Jan A. Bergstra University of Amsterdam
Jonathan P. Bowen
Jonathan P. Bowen London South Bank University
John-Jules Ch. Meyer
John-Jules Ch. Meyer Utrecht University
Bernhard Steffen
Bernhard Steffen TU Dortmund University
Gregor von Bochmann
Gregor von Bochmann University of Ottawa
André Platzer
André Platzer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science doesn't have to be limited to traditional on-campus routes. Today, many of the most affordable online colleges offer flexible, high-quality computer science programs that can fit any budget.

If your academic record is a concern, some of the best colleges for low gpa provide pathways for students who may not meet the strictest admissions criteria, making education more accessible for everyone.

For those seeking to accelerate their career growth, computer science degree online options allow motivated learners to graduate sooner—sometimes in as little as 12 to 18 months.

Computer Science graduates can pursue a wide range of jobs, not only in technology but also in other sectors like healthcare, business, and even environmental analysis. If you're curious about diverse opportunities in related fields, check out what kind of roles are available with what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree to explore other interdisciplinary career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Ernst-Rüdiger Olderog

Trending Scientists