World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mogens Nielsen

Mogens Nielsen

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
8652
World Ranking
11923
National Ranking
57

Mogens Nielsen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mogens Nielsen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 124 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mogens Nielsen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mogens Nielsen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mogens Nielsen is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and works across multiple academic disciplines including Computer Science, Business, Management and Accounting, as well as Social Sciences. Their research bridges theoretical and applied domains, reflecting a diverse scholarly portfolio.

Their main research topics include Petri Nets in System Modeling, Business Process Modeling and Analysis, and Access Control and Trust. These areas indicate an interest in both formal systems and organizational processes, covering computational methods and information systems management.

Among their recent contributions is the paper titled Decidability Issues for Petri Nets -- a survey, published in 2024 in arXiv (Cornell University). This work addresses fundamental aspects of Petri Nets, a mathematical modeling tool widely used in system and process analysis.

Nielsen has collaborated frequently with the following co-authors:

  • Javier Esparza
  • John Christensen
  • Ole Uhrskov Friis
  • Hans Frimor
  • Dennis van Liempd

Their publications have appeared primarily in the venue arXiv (Cornell University), demonstrating engagement with open-access and preprint platforms common in computational fields.

In addition to journal and conference contributions, Mogens Nielsen has authored a book titled Virksomhedens årsregnskab, released in 2023 by the University of Southern Denmark. This publication is situated in the field of Business, Management and Accounting and suggests an intersection between academic research and practical business education.

Their subfields of study further reflect interdisciplinary engagement, encompassing Computational Theory and Mathematics, Management Information Systems, and Sociology and Political Science. This range illustrates a blend of technical, managerial, and social scientific perspectives in their work.

Best Publications

  • Petri nets, event structures and domains, part I

    Mogens Nielsen;Gordon D. Plotkin;Glynn Winskel

  • Models for concurrency

    Glynn Winskel;Mogens Nielsen

  • Decidability Issues for Petri Nets

    Javier Esparza;Mogens Nielsen

  • Bisimulation from Open Maps

    André Joyal;Mogens Nielsen;Glynn Winskel

  • Elementary transition systems

    M. Nielsen;G. Rozenberg;P. S. Thiagarajan

  • Decidability Issues for Petri Nets - a survey.

    Javier Esparza;Mogens Nielsen

  • A formal model for trust in dynamic networks

    M. Carbone;M. Nielsen;V. Sassone

  • Petri Nets, Event Structures and Domains

    Mogens Nielsen;Gordon D. Plotkin;Glynn Winskel

  • Towards a Notion of Distributed Time for Petri Nets

    Mogens Nielsen;Vladimiro Sassone;Jirí Srba

  • Relationships Between Models of Concurrency

    Mogens Nielsen;Vladimiro Sassone;Glynn Winskel

  • Models for concurrency: towards a classification

    Vladimiro Sassone;Mogens Nielsen;Glynn Winskel

  • Application and Theory of Petri Nets 2000

    Mogens Nielsen;Dan Simpson

  • A Calculus of Communicating Systems with Label Passing

    Uffe Henrik Engberg;Mogens Nielsen

  • Temporal concurrent constraint programming: denotation, logic and applications

    Mogens Nielsen;Catuscia Palamidessi;Frank D. Valencia

  • TAPSOFT '95: Theory and Practice of Software Development

    Peter D. Mosses;Mogens Nielsen;Michael I. Schwartzbach

  • Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2000

    Mogens Nielsen;Branislav Rovan

  • A Bayesian Model for Event-based Trust

    Mogens Nielsen;Karl Krukow;Vladimiro Sassone

  • Petri nets and bisimulation

    Mogens Nielsen;Glynn Winskel

  • Secure Data Flow in a Calculus for Context Awareness

    Doina Bucur;Mogens Nielsen

  • Degrees of Non-Determinism and Concurrency: A Petri Net View

    Mogens Nielsen;P. S. Thiagarajan

Frequent Co-Authors

Vladimiro Sassone
Vladimiro Sassone University of Southampton
Glynn Winskel
Glynn Winskel University of Cambridge
P. S. Thiagarajan
P. S. Thiagarajan Harvard University
Grzegorz Rozenberg
Grzegorz Rozenberg Leiden University
Catuscia Palamidessi
Catuscia Palamidessi French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Michael I. Schwartzbach
Michael I. Schwartzbach Aarhus University
Keith A. Christian
Keith A. Christian Charles Darwin University
Kim Guldstrand Larsen
Kim Guldstrand Larsen Aalborg University
Antonín Kučera
Antonín Kučera Masaryk University
Javier Esparza
Javier Esparza Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can help you expand your career options beyond traditional computer science. For example, pursuing a data science degree offers expertise in data analysis, big data, and machine learning—skills increasingly in demand across tech and business sectors.

If you're interested in technology and hardware, the best online electrical engineering programs USA offer flexible ways to gain knowledge in electronics, automation, and communications, broadening your engineering credentials while you study remotely.

For those seeking quicker pathways to lucrative careers, consider certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can often be completed in less time and help you qualify for specialized tech roles or increase your earning potential.

Finally, if you want to maximize your qualifications quickly, explore the fastest masters degree online options. Earning a master’s degree in a short time frame can help you advance into leadership positions or specialized areas in computer science and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Mogens Nielsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles