World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
14410
World Ranking
7022
National Ranking
423

Glynn Winskel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glynn Winskel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 172 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Glynn Winskel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glynn Winskel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Glynn Winskel is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science with a focus on various subfields including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Management Information Systems, and Information Systems.

The scientist's recent papers reflect a concentration on concurrency, logic, and formal methods. Notable publications include:

  • "Event structures Lecture notes for the Advanced Course on Petri Nets," 2021, CL Technical Reports
  • "Causal Unfoldings and Disjunctive Causes," 2023, Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • "Making Concurrency Functional," 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Models and logic of MOS circuits Lectures for the Marktoberdorf Summerschool, August 1986," 2021, CL Technical Reports
  • "Category theory and models for parallel computation," 2021, CL Technical Reports

Their work covers topics related to distributed systems and fault tolerance, logic, programming and type systems, formal methods in verification, logic, reasoning and knowledge, business process modeling and analysis, computability, logic, AI algorithms, and Petri nets in system modeling.

  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling

Frequent coauthors include Marc de Visme, Stefan Haar, Simon Castellan, Pierre Clairambault, and Yoàv Montacute. The researcher has published multiple times in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), CL Technical Reports, Logical Methods in Computer Science, and ACM SIGLOG News.

  • Marc de Visme
  • Stefan Haar
  • Simon Castellan
  • Pierre Clairambault
  • Yoàv Montacute

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • CL Technical Reports
  • Logical Methods in Computer Science
  • ACM SIGLOG News

They have been recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea since 2011.

Best Publications

  • The Formal Semantics of Programming Languages: An Introduction

    Glynn Winskel

  • Event structures

    G Winskel

  • Petri nets, event structures and domains, part I

    Mogens Nielsen;Gordon D. Plotkin;Glynn Winskel

  • Models for concurrency

    Glynn Winskel;Mogens Nielsen

  • An Introduction to Event Structures

    Glynn Winskel

  • Bisimulation from Open Maps

    André Joyal;Mogens Nielsen;Glynn Winskel

  • Bisimulation and open maps

    A. Joyal;M. Nielson;G. Winskel

  • Petri Nets, Event Structures and Domains

    Mogens Nielsen;Gordon D. Plotkin;Glynn Winskel

  • Event Structure Semantics for CCS and Related Languages

    Glynn Winskel

  • Events in computation

    Glynn Winskel

  • Petr nets, algebras, morphisms, and compositionality

    Glynn Winskel

  • Relationships Between Models of Concurrency

    Mogens Nielsen;Vladimiro Sassone;Glynn Winskel

  • Distributing probability over non-determinism

    Daniele Varacca;Glynn Winskel

  • Models for concurrency: towards a classification

    Vladimiro Sassone;Mogens Nielsen;Glynn Winskel

  • Using information systems to solve reoursive domain equations effectively

    K. G. Larsen;G. Winskel

  • Events in security protocols

    Federico Crazzolara;Glynn Winskel

  • Petri Nets as Models of Linear Logic

    Uffe Engberg;Glynn Winskel

  • A note on model checking the model n-calculus

    Glynn Winskel

  • CCS with priority choice

    Juanito Camilleri;Glynn Winskel

  • Presheaf Models for the pi-Calculus

    Gian Luca Cattani;Ian Stark;Glynn Winskel

Frequent Co-Authors

Mogens Nielsen
Mogens Nielsen Aarhus University
John Power
John Power Macquarie University
Prakash Panangaden
Prakash Panangaden McGill University
Gordon Plotkin
Gordon Plotkin University of Edinburgh
Vladimiro Sassone
Vladimiro Sassone University of Southampton
A. W. Roscoe
A. W. Roscoe University of Oxford
Kim Guldstrand Larsen
Kim Guldstrand Larsen Aalborg University
Vincent Danos
Vincent Danos École Normale Supérieure
Ugo Montanari
Ugo Montanari University of Pisa
Carl A. Gunter
Carl A. Gunter University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a variety of academic and career options in the USA. Many students consider combining Computer Science with one of the best majors in college, such as engineering, business, or data analytics, to broaden their skills and employment prospects.

For those seeking flexibility or aiming for career advancement, online graduate programs offer significant appeal. If you’re looking for a fast track to enhance qualifications, you might find an easiest masters degree to get to be an efficient step. These programs help working professionals gain specialized expertise rapidly, often from the comfort of their own home.

Online doctorate programs are also growing in popularity. Students who prioritize affordability can look for options among the cheap doctorate degree online programs, making it more feasible to attain the highest academic credentials.

For those focused on leadership in education and a quick progression, consider the new wave of 1 year edd programs online. These accelerated degrees offer an efficient path to advanced educational roles.

By exploring these related degrees and pathways, students can tailor their academic journey to match their career ambitions and lifestyle needs.

Best Scientists Citing Glynn Winskel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles