World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael A. Jenike

Michael A. Jenike

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
41468
World Ranking
6761
National Ranking
3568

Michael A. Jenike publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Jenike sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 306 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael A. Jenike D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael A. Jenike sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael A. Jenike is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and neuroscience.

Their research primarily focuses on clinical psychology and cognitive neuroscience, with additional work related to psychiatry and mental health, genetics, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Key topics covered in their publications include:

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Recent papers by Michael A. Jenike include:

  • Genome-wide association study of pediatric obsessive-compulsive traits: shared genetic risk between traits and disorder, 2021, Translational Psychiatry
  • Genome-wide association study identifies new locus associated with OCD, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with this researcher are:

  • Scott L. Rauch
  • Darin D. Dougherty
  • Christie L. Burton
  • Lauren Erdman
  • Dongmei Yu

Publication venues where Michael A. Jenike frequently contributes include:

  • Translational Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Masked Presentations of Emotional Facial Expressions Modulate Amygdala Activity without Explicit Knowledge

    Paul J. Whalen;Scott L. Rauch;Nancy L. Etcoff;Sean C. McInerney

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • A symptom provocation study of posttraumatic stress disorder using positron emission tomography and script-driven imagery

    S L Rauch;B A van der Kolk;R E Fisler;N M Alpert

  • Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex: A role in reward-based decision making

    George Bush;Brent A. Vogt;Jennifer Holmes;Anders M. Dale

  • Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the counting stroop

    George Bush;Jean A Frazier;Scott L Rauch;Larry J Seidman;Larry J Seidman

  • Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Measured During Symptom Provocation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Oxygen 15—Labeled Carbon Dioxide and Positron Emission Tomography

    Scott L. Rauch;Michael A. Jenike;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Lee Baer

  • The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI

    George Bush;George Bush;Paul J. Whalen;Bruce R. Rosen;Bruce R. Rosen;Michael A. Jenike

  • Use of factor-analyzed symptom dimensions to predict outcome with serotonin reuptake inhibitors and placebo in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    David Mataix-Cols;Scott L. Rauch;Peter A. Manzo;Michael A. Jenike

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Hans C. Breiter;Scott L. Rauch;Kenneth K. Kwong;John R. Baker

  • The emotional counting stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division

    Paul J Whalen;George Bush;George Bush;Richard J McNally;Sabine Wilhelm

  • DSM-IV field trial: Obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    E B Foa;M J Kozak;W K Goodman;E Hollander

  • Long-term outcome of pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis and qualitative review of the literature.

    S. E. Stewart;D. A. Geller;M. Jenike;M. Jenike;D. Pauls

  • Organizational strategies mediate nonverbal memory impairment in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Cary R Savage;Lee Baer;Nancy J Keuthen;Halle D Brown

  • The functional neuroanatomy of anxiety: a study of three disorders using positron emission tomography and symptom provocation

    Scott L. Rauch;Cary R. Savage;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Alan J. Fischman

  • Augmentation of behavior therapy with D-cycloserine for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Sabine Wilhelm;Ulrike Buhlmann;David F. Tolin;Suzanne A. Meunier

  • The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Hairpulling Scale: 1. Development and Factor Analyses

    Nancy J. Keuthen;Richard L. O’Sullivan;Joseph N. Ricciardi;David Shera

  • A Multicenter Investigation of Fixed-Dose Fluoxetine in the Treatment of Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

    Gary D. Tollefson;Alvin H. Rampey;Janet H. Potvin;Michael A. Jenike

  • Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    S. E. Stewart;D. Yu;J. M. Scharf;B. M. Neale

  • Prospective long-term follow-up of 44 patients who received cingulotomy for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Darin D. Dougherty;Lee Baer;G. Rees Cosgrove;Edwin H. Cassem

  • A Positron Emission Tomographic Study of Simple Phobic Symptom Provocation

    Scott L. Rauch;Cary R. Savage;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Euripedes C. Miguel

Frequent Co-Authors

Lee Baer
Lee Baer Harvard University
Scott L. Rauch
Scott L. Rauch McLean Hospital
Cary R. Savage
Cary R. Savage University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Nancy J. Keuthen
Nancy J. Keuthen Harvard University
Sabine Wilhelm
Sabine Wilhelm Harvard University
Euripedes Constantino Miguel
Euripedes Constantino Miguel Universidade de São Paulo
Thilo Deckersbach
Thilo Deckersbach Harvard University
Darin D. Dougherty
Darin D. Dougherty Harvard University
Hans C. Breiter
Hans C. Breiter University of Cincinnati
Danielle C. Cath
Danielle C. Cath Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens many doors beyond traditional medical school. For those looking to enter nursing, you might wonder, do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN roles? Some programs offer flexible entry requirements, making nursing accessible for various backgrounds.

If you are interested in the administrative side of healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration degree online accredited can prepare you for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and private practices. These online programs offer convenience and help working professionals upskill on their schedule.

Licensed nurses hoping to advance their careers should consider bridge programs such as ASN to FNP. These options streamline your path to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner or holding other advanced practice roles.

Finally, if you’re passionate about wellness and nutrition, an online bachelor's in nutrition is a flexible degree that can lead to roles in healthcare, fitness, or food industries. Each of these educational paths offers unique opportunities in the rapidly expanding healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Michael A. Jenike

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles