World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
22193
World Ranking
4616
National Ranking
2081

Hans C. Breiter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans C. Breiter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 144 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Hans C. Breiter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans C. Breiter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans C. Breiter is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience, with a total of 39, 24, and 18 publications in these fields respectively.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Breiter's publications appear frequently in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Neurotrauma

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Nicole L. Vike
  • Sumra Bari
  • Aggelos K. Katsaggelos
  • Khrystyna Stetsiv
  • Leandros Stefanopoulos

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Breiter include:

  • "Acute Cortisol Administration Triggers Craving in Individuals with Cocaine Dependence," 2025, Psychopharmacology Bulletin
  • "Anxiety, Post-COVID-19 Syndrome-Related Depression, and Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in COVID-19 Survivors: Cross-sectional Study," 2022, JMIR Formative Research
  • "In humans, striato-pallido-thalamic projections are largely segregated by their origin in either the striosome-like or matrix-like compartments," 2023, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "Preliminary Report: Localized Cerebral Blood Flow Mediates the Relationship between Progesterone and Perceived Stress Symptoms among Female Collegiate Club Athletes after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury," 2021, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "Metabolomic response to collegiate football participation: Pre- and Post-season analysis," 2022, Scientific Reports

Their research contribution touches on diverse subfields within Neuroscience and Psychology including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. These subfields highlight interdisciplinary approaches in their scientific inquiries.

Best Publications

  • Response and Habituation of the Human Amygdala during Visual Processing of Facial Expression

    Hans C Breiter;Nancy L Etcoff;Paul J Whalen;William A Kennedy

  • Functional Imaging of Neural Responses to Expectancy and Experience of Monetary Gains and Losses

    Hans C. Breiter;Itzhak Aharon;Daniel Kahneman;Anders Dale

  • Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging

    R. B. H. Tootell;J. B. Reppas;K. K. Kwong;R. Malach

  • Acute effects of cocaine on human brain activity and emotion

    Hans C Breiter;Randy L Gollub;Robert M Weisskoff;David N Kennedy

  • Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value: fMRI and Behavioral Evidence

    Itzhak Aharon;Nancy Etcoff;Dan Ariely;Christopher F Chabris;Christopher F Chabris

  • Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Measured During Symptom Provocation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Oxygen 15—Labeled Carbon Dioxide and Positron Emission Tomography

    Scott L. Rauch;Michael A. Jenike;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Lee Baer

  • Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation. A mapping study using functional MRI.

    M. S. Cohen;M. S. Cohen;S. M. Kosslyn;H. C. Breiter;G. J. DiGirolamo

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of symptom provocation in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Hans C. Breiter;Scott L. Rauch;Kenneth K. Kwong;John R. Baker

  • Reward Circuitry Activation by Noxious Thermal Stimuli

    Lino Becerra;Hans C. Breiter;Roy Wise;R.Gilberto Gonzalez

  • Striatal Recruitment During an Implicit Sequence Learning Task as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Scott L. Rauch;Paul J. Whalen;Cary R. Savage;Tim Curran

  • Decreased volume of the brain reward system in alcoholism.

    Nikos Makris;Marlene Oscar-Berman;Sharon Kim Jaffin;Steven M. Hodge

  • A Positron Emission Tomographic Study of Simple Phobic Symptom Provocation

    Scott L. Rauch;Cary R. Savage;Nathaniel M. Alpert;Euripedes C. Miguel

  • Human brain activation under controlled thermal stimulation and habituation to noxious heat: An fMRI study

    Lino R. Becerra;Hans C. Breiter;Milan Stojanovic;Scott M Fishman

  • Cerebral structural abnormalities in obsessive-compulsive disorder. A quantitative morphometric magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Michael A. Jenike;Hans C. Breiter;Lee Baer;David N. Kennedy

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of brain reward circuitry in the human.

    Hans C. Breiter;Bruce R. Rosen

  • A Proposal for a Coordinated Effort for the Determination of Brainwide Neuroanatomical Connectivity in Model Organisms at a Mesoscopic Scale

    Jason W. Bohland;Caizhi Wu;Helen Barbas;Hemant Bokil

  • Acute plasticity in the human somatosensory cortex following amputation

    D Borsook;L Becerra;S Fishman;A Edwards

  • Cannabis Use Is Quantitatively Associated with Nucleus Accumbens and Amygdala Abnormalities in Young Adult Recreational Users

    Jodi M. Gilman;John K. Kuster;Sang Lee;Myung Joo Lee

  • Amygdala Volume Associated With Alcohol Abuse Relapse and Craving

    Jana Wrase;Nicos Makris;Dieter F. Braus;Karl Mann

  • Optimizing real time fMRI neurofeedback for therapeutic discovery and development

    L.E. Stoeckel;L.E. Stoeckel;K.A. Garrison;S.S. Ghosh;P. Wighton

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Nikos Makris
Nikos Makris Brigham and Women's Hospital
David N. Kennedy
David N. Kennedy University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Scott L. Rauch
Scott L. Rauch McLean Hospital
Jill M. Goldstein
Jill M. Goldstein Harvard University
Larry J. Seidman
Larry J. Seidman Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Michael A. Jenike
Michael A. Jenike Harvard University
James L. Reilly
James L. Reilly Northwestern University
Cary R. Savage
Cary R. Savage University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Lee Baer
Lee Baer Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, exploring related online degrees can open various career pathways. Those aiming for clinical psychology roles should consider psyd online programs, which offer advanced training for future psychologist licensure. If you’re focused on marriage and family therapy, there are mft online options that may allow you to start your practice faster.

Undergraduates looking for an efficient route might pursue a bachelor degree online in 2 years. Accelerated programs help you enter the workforce quickly or continue with graduate studies sooner. As you consider your options, remember the importance of future earnings potential. Many students seek out degrees that pay well as they plan for stable and rewarding careers in healthcare, research, or education.

Choosing the right online degree not only determines your expertise area, but also influences your professional opportunities and salary. Investigate your interests and the many flexible learning options available to launch your neuroscience-related career with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing Hans C. Breiter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles