World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Poland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 77 1253 1212 4 4 687 27415

Janusz Kacprzyk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janusz Kacprzyk between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janusz Kacprzyk published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 15.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 45 publications in 2010. 16 of the 786 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 45. Peak 45 publications in 2010. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 1 publication 1978: 4 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 4 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 29 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 33 publications 2008: 29 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 45 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 34 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 35 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 45 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 3 publications
1976 2026

786 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janusz Kacprzyk: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 1
1978 4
1979 1
1980 4
1981 1
1982 2
1983 5
1984 4
1985 4
1986 6
1987 3
1988 7
1989 3
1990 5
1991 3
1992 7
1993 3
1994 4
1995 11
1996 8
1997 12
1998 12
1999 18
2000 15
2001 20
2002 13
2003 17
2004 10
2005 29
2006 21
2007 33
2008 29
2009 39
2010 45
2011 20
2012 18
2013 31
2014 26
2015 28
2016 34
2017 26
2018 35
2019 14
2020 23
2021 22
2022 45
2023 31
2024 17
2025 13
2026 3
Total 786
Download as CSV

Janusz Kacprzyk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janusz Kacprzyk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 682–691 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 687 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14 687
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Janusz Kacprzyk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janusz Kacprzyk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139 77
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Poland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Poland Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Poland Leader Award
  • 2020 - Member of the European Academy of Sciences
  • 2014 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2010 - Polish Academy of Science
  • 2006 - Fuzzy Systems Pioneer Award, IEEE Computational Intelligence Society
  • 2006 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to use of fuzzy logic in decision making and control.
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts

Overview

Janusz Kacprzyk is affiliated with the Systems Research Institute in Poland. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within Computer Science, Decision Sciences, and Engineering. Within these fields, their work focuses significantly on subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Signal Processing, Control and Systems Engineering, and Statistics and Probability.

The scientist's research addresses a range of topics, with major emphasis on Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Data Management and Algorithms, Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems, Fuzzy Systems and Optimization, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Systems Applications, Cognitive Science and Mapping, as well as Optimization and Mathematical Programming.

Janusz Kacprzyk has published numerous papers, notable recent contributions include:

  • Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture, 2020, Computers in Industry
  • A comprehensive review on type 2 fuzzy logic applications: Past, present and future, 2020, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • Special issue on Agri-Food 4.0 and digitalization in agriculture supply chains - New directions, challenges and applications, 2020, Computers in Industry
  • On the philosophical, cognitive and mathematical foundations of symbiotic autonomous systems, 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • The OWA operator in multiple linear regression, 2022, Applied Soft Computing

Regarding collaborations, Janusz Kacprzyk frequently coauthors with:

  • Sławomir Zadrożny
  • Jan W. Owsiński
  • Eulalia Szmidt
  • Witold Pedrycz
  • Valentina Emilia Bălaş

The scientist's work has been published in various venues, with a concentration in:

  • Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
  • Computers in Industry
  • Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Axioms

Janusz Kacprzyk has also contributed extensively to book publications. Major publishers include:

  • Springer International Publishing, with 38 works including titles such as "International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development" (2023) and "Information Systems and Technologies" (2022)
  • Springer Nature, with 36 books including "Computational Intelligence for Water and Environmental Sciences" (2022) and "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for COVID-19" (2021)
  • Springer Science+Business Media, with 4 books, including "Flexible Query Answering Systems" (2021)
  • Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science series with 1 book titled "Granular, Fuzzy, and Soft Computing" (2023)

The scientist's career includes several distinctions:

  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences (2020)
  • Member of Academia Europaea (2014)
  • Member of the Polish Academy of Science (2010)
  • Fuzzy Systems Pioneer Award by the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society (2006)
  • IEEE Fellow (2006) for contributions to fuzzy logic in decision making and control
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts

Best Publications

  • Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Eulalia Szmidt;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets

    Eulalia Szmidt;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority

    J Kacprzyk

  • The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators

    Ronald R. Yager;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture

    Mario Lezoche;Jorge E. Hernandez;Maria del Mar Eva Alemany Díaz;Hervé Panetto

  • A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment

    Enrique Herrera-Viedma;Francisco Javier Cabrerizo;Janusz Kacprzyk;Witold Pedrycz

  • Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Mario Fedrizzi;Hannu Nurmi

  • Recent Developments in the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice

    Ronald R. Yager;Janusz Kacprzyk;Gleb Beliakov

  • A ‘soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Mario Fedrizzi

  • Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems 1

    Lotfi Asker Zadeh;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • Discussion: Terminological difficulties in fuzzy set theory---The case of “Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets”

    Didier Dubois;Siegfried Gottwald;Petr Hajek;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • Incomplete Information: Rough Set Analysis

    Ewa Orlowska;J. Kacprzyk

  • A Similarity Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Its Application in Supporting Medical Diagnostic Reasoning

    Eulalia Szmidt;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • LINGUISTIC SUMMARIES OF DATA USING FUZZY LOGIC

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Ronald R. Yager

  • Linguistic database summaries and their protoforms: towards natural language based knowledge discovery tools

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrozny

  • A consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations

    Eulalia Szmidt;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • Database Queries with Fuzzy Linguistic Quantifiers

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Andrzej Ziolkowski

  • Fuzziness in database management systems

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrożny;Guy De Tré

  • Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in some Medical Applications

    Eulalia Szmidt;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • A comprehensive review on type 2 fuzzy logic applications: Past, present and future

    Kanika Mittal;Amita Jain;Kunwar Singh Vaisla;Oscar Castillo

  • Multiperson decision making models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Mario Fedrizzi

  • Advances in Web Intelligence

    Piotr S. Szczepaniak;Janusz Kacprzyk;Adam Niewiadomski

  • Fquery for Access: Fuzzy Querying for a Windows-Based DBMS

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrożny

  • Fuzzy Regression Analysis

    Hisao Ishibuchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Sławomir Zadrożny
Sławomir Zadrożny Systems Research Institute
Eulalia Szmidt
Eulalia Szmidt Systems Research Institute
Oscar Castillo
Oscar Castillo Instituto Tecnológico de Tijuana
Witold Pedrycz
Witold Pedrycz University of Alberta
Patricia Melin
Patricia Melin Instituto Tecnológico de Tijuana
Krassimir T. Atanassov
Krassimir T. Atanassov Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
José M. Merigó
José M. Merigó University of Technology Sydney
Lotfi A. Zadeh
Lotfi A. Zadeh University of California, Berkeley
Ronald R. Yager
Ronald R. Yager Iona University
Gabriella Pasi
Gabriella Pasi University of Milano-Bicocca

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in computer science opens up a wide range of options to fit your goals and lifestyle. Many students consider starting with associate programs, which offer a fast entry into tech roles. If you're wondering what's the easiest associate's degree to get, online computer science and IT programs are solid choices that balance flexibility and foundational knowledge.

Affordability can be a concern when pursuing further education. Thankfully, there are affordable edd programs online for those looking to advance into academic, research, or leadership positions in tech education.

Selecting the right institution matters, especially for online degrees. Check out the best online schools for nationally accredited programs to ensure you receive a recognized and quality education.

Interested in a creative tech field? There are also game design degree programs online, perfect for those passionate about gaming and interactive media. These programs help students build both coding and design skills for dynamic, in-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing Janusz Kacprzyk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles