World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sławomir Zadrożny

Sławomir Zadrożny

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 36 11196 10878 24 23 284 6008

Sławomir Zadrożny publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sławomir Zadrożny between 1986 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sławomir Zadrożny published across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2009. 6 of the 305 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2009. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1986 2026

305 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sławomir Zadrożny: publications per year, 1986 to 2026
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 2
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 1
1996 2
1997 4
1998 2
1999 4
2000 9
2001 8
2002 4
2003 7
2004 4
2005 17
2006 14
2007 12
2008 9
2009 23
2010 21
2011 9
2012 9
2013 20
2014 13
2015 15
2016 19
2017 7
2018 11
2019 1
2020 4
2021 15
2022 8
2023 15
2024 1
2025 5
2026 1
Total 305
Download as CSV

Sławomir Zadrożny publications per year - data summary

  • Sławomir Zadrożny, a Computer Science scholar from Systems Research Institute, has 305 publications recorded across 41 years, from 1986 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986, 1987, 1991, 1992 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 41 years in the span carry no publications at all (1990 and 1993).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.8 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 30 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 24 publications (1.7 per year); 2000-2013: 166 publications (11.9 per year); 2014-2026: 115 publications (8.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Sławomir Zadrożny publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sławomir Zadrożny sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 282–291 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 284 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320 284
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Sławomir Zadrożny publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Sławomir Zadrożny, a Computer Science scholar from Systems Research Institute, records 284 publications - the 70th percentile of the discipline.
  • 70% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Sławomir Zadrożny, and about 30% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Sławomir Zadrożny ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Sławomir Zadrożny D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sławomir Zadrożny sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 36
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Sławomir Zadrożny D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Sławomir Zadrożny, a Computer Science scholar from Systems Research Institute, records 36 D-Index - the 23rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 23% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Sławomir Zadrożny, and about 77% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Sławomir Zadrożny ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Sławomir Zadrożny is affiliated with the Systems Research Institute in Poland. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science and decision sciences, emphasizing both theoretical and applied aspects of data analysis and decision support systems.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Decision Sciences

Within these fields, their work concentrates on several subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Signal Processing
  • Information Systems
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics

Their primary research topics cover:

  • Data Management and Algorithms
  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Zadrożny has coauthored extensively with several researchers, notably:

  • Janusz Kacprzyk
  • Jan W. Owsiński
  • Karol Opara
  • Marek Gajewski
  • Olgierd Hryniewicz

The researcher has contributed articles to various academic venues, including:

  • Procedia Computer Science
  • Digital Communications and Networks
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Control and Cybernetics
  • Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems

Notable recent papers authored by or involving Zadrożny are:

  • "A Group Decision-Making Approach Leveraging Preference Relations Derived from Large Language Model," 2024, Procedia Computer Science
  • "Data-driven human and bot recognition from web activity logs based on hybrid learning techniques," 2023, Digital Communications and Networks
  • "A novel approach to hierarchical contextual bipolar queries: A winnow operator approach," 2022, Control and Cybernetics
  • "The Power and Potentials of Flexible Query Answering Systems: A Critical and Comprehensive Analysis," 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "On some concept lattice of social choice functions," 2023, Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems

Zadrożny's work also includes several book publications with established publishers. These include:

  • Uncertainty and Imprecision in Decision Making and Decision Support: New Challenges, Solutions and Perspectives (Springer Nature, 2020)
  • Reverse Clustering (Springer Nature, 2021)
  • Uncertainty and Imprecision in Decision Making and Decision Support - New Advances, Challenges, and Perspectives (Springer International Publishing, 2023)
  • Analysing Web Traffic (Springer International Publishing, 2023)
  • Flexible Query Answering Systems (Springer Science+Business Media, 2021)

Best Publications

  • Linguistic database summaries and their protoforms: towards natural language based knowledge discovery tools

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrozny

  • Fuzziness in database management systems

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrożny;Guy De Tré

  • A Fuzzy Logic Based Approach to Linguistic Summaries of Databases

    J. Kacprzyk;R. R. Yager;S. Zadrożny

  • Linguistic summarization of time series using a fuzzy quantifier driven aggregation

    J. Kacprzyk;A. Wilbik;S. Zadrożny

  • Fquery for Access: Fuzzy Querying for a Windows-Based DBMS

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrożny

  • Computing with words in intelligent database querying: standalone and internet-based application

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir zadrożny

  • Computing With Words Is an Implementable Paradigm: Fuzzy Queries, Linguistic Data Summaries, and Natural-Language Generation

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sawomir Zadrozny

  • Artificial Neural Networks: Formal Models and Their Applications - ICANN 2005

    Włodzisław Duch;Janusz Kacprzyk;Erkki Oja;Sławomir Zadrożny

  • An interactive multi-user decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers

    Mario Fedrizzi;Janusz Kacprzyk;Slawomir Zadrozny

  • FQUERY III+: A “human-consistent” database querying system based on fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrożny;Andrzej Ziołkowski

  • Soft computing and Web intelligence for supporting consensus reaching

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrożny

  • Artificial Neural Networks: Biological Inspirations – ICANN 2005

    Włodzisław Duch;Janusz Kacprzyk;Erkki Oja;Sławomir Zadrożny

  • Towards a general and unified characterization of individual and collective choice functions under fuzzy and nonfuzzy preferences and majority via the ordered weighted average operators

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Sławomir Zadrożny

  • Computing with words for text processing: An approach to the text categorization

    Sławomir Zadrony;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • Towards a general and unified characterization of individual and collective choice functions under fuzzy and nonfuzzy preferences and majority via the ordered weighted average operators

    Unknown

  • Consensual Processes

    Enrique Herrera-Viedma;Jos Luis Garca-Lapresta;Janusz Kacprzyk;Mario Fedrizzi

  • Bipolar Queries and Queries with Preferences.

    Slawomir Zadrozny;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • An Overview of Fuzzy Approaches to Flexible Database Querying

    Slawomir Zadrozny;Guy De Tré;Rita M. M. De Caluwe;Janusz Kacprzyk

  • Fuzzy Linguistic Summaries of Databases for an Efficient Business Data Analysis and Decision Support

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Ronald R. Yager;Slawomir Zadrozny

  • Computing with words in decision making through individual and collective linguistic choice rules

    Janusz Kacprzyk;SŁawomir Zadrozny

  • Fuzzy querying for Microsoft Access

    J. Kacprzyk;S. Zadrozny

  • Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017

    Janusz Kacprzyk;Eulalia Szmidt;Sławomir Zadrożny;Krassimir T. Atanassov

  • Artificial neural networks : biological inspirations - ICANN 2005 : 15th International Conference, Warsaw, Poland, September 11-15, 2005 : proceedings, part I

    W. Duch;Janusz Kacprzyk;Erkki Oja

Frequent Co-Authors

Janusz Kacprzyk
Janusz Kacprzyk Systems Research Institute
Erkki Oja
Erkki Oja Aalto University
Włodzisław Duch
Włodzisław Duch Nicolaus Copernicus University
Krassimir T. Atanassov
Krassimir T. Atanassov Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
Gabriella Pasi
Gabriella Pasi University of Milano-Bicocca
Eulalia Szmidt
Eulalia Szmidt Systems Research Institute
Adnan Yazici
Adnan Yazici Nazarbayev University
Enrique Herrera-Viedma
Enrique Herrera-Viedma University of Granada
Ronald R. Yager
Ronald R. Yager Iona University
Witold Pedrycz
Witold Pedrycz University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up numerous related pathways through online education. Many students seek flexible options, such as the affordable emba programs now available online. These programs help computer science graduates move into advanced leadership and management roles in tech industries.

Beyond standard computer science tracks, unique fields such as library management also attract tech-minded students. Pursuing a master library science online can lead to opportunities in digital archiving, information management, and technology integration within libraries.

Anyone wanting to explore graduate study will find numerous choices through the most affordable online masters programs, offering flexibility and significant cost savings.

Tech professionals interested in executive careers can pursue doctoral degrees, such as the best online doctorate in organizational leadership, to develop advanced skills in organizational change, innovation, and leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Sławomir Zadrożny

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles