World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 62 2552 2433 1024 946 185 22116

Kendall L. Carder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kendall L. Carder between 1970 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kendall L. Carder published across 48 years, from 1970 to 2017, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 1997. 1 of the 190 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 1997. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 2 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1970 2017

190 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kendall L. Carder: publications per year, 1970 to 2017
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 2
1972 1
1973 1
1974 2
1975 0
1976 0
1977 4
1978 1
1979 2
1980 3
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 3
1985 4
1986 3
1987 1
1988 3
1989 6
1990 3
1991 4
1992 4
1993 4
1994 8
1995 6
1996 4
1997 13
1998 5
1999 8
2000 8
2001 13
2002 8
2003 13
2004 10
2005 9
2006 13
2007 6
2008 3
2009 3
2010 1
2011 0
2012 1
2013 2
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
Total 190
Download as CSV

Kendall L. Carder publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kendall L. Carder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 185 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400 185
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Kendall L. Carder D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kendall L. Carder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143 62
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Kendall L. Carder is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their professional profile reflects involvement in academic research, with a focus that aligns with the institution's educational and research environment.

There are no listed recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications currently associated with Kendall L. Carder. Similarly, there is no specific information available regarding their main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of research.

The absence of such data limits detailed insights into the precise areas of expertise or contributions made by this researcher. No awards or honors have been documented in connection with their academic career.

Given the available information, Kendall L. Carder can be identified primarily through their institutional affiliation. Further data would be necessary to provide a more comprehensive academic and scientific profile.

Best Publications

  • Ocean Color Chlorophyll Algorithms for SEAWIFS

    John E. O'Reilly;Stéphane Maritorena;B. Greg Mitchell;David A. Siegel

  • Deriving inherent optical properties from water color: a multiband quasi-analytical algorithm for optically deep waters

    ZhongPing Lee;Kendall L. Carder;Robert A. Arnone

  • Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters: 2. Deriving bottom depths and water properties by optimization

    Zhongping Lee;Kendall L. Carder;Curtis D. Mobley;Robert G. Steward

  • Marine humic and fulvic acids: Their effects on remote sensing of ocean chlorophyll

    Kendall L. Carder;Robert G. Steward;George R. Harvey;Peter B. Ortner

  • Hyperspectral remote sensing for shallow waters. I. A semianalytical model.

    Zhongping Lee;Kendall L. Carder;Curtis D. Mobley;Robert G. Steward

  • A simple spectral solar irradiance model for cloudless maritime atmospheres

    Watson W. Gregg;K. L. Carder

  • Semianalytic Moderate‐Resolution Imaging Spectrometer algorithms for chlorophyll a and absorption with bio‐optical domains based on nitrate‐depletion temperatures

    Kendall L. Carder;F. R. Chen;Zhong-Ping Lee;Steven K. Hawes

  • An overview of MODIS capabilities for ocean science observations

    W.E. Esaias;M.R. Abbott;I. Barton;O.B. Brown

  • Modeling in situ phytoplankton absorption from total absorption spectra in productive inland marine waters

    Collin S. Roesler;Mary Jane Perry;Kendall L. Carder

  • Determination of spectral absorption coefficients of particles, dissolved material and phytoplankton for discrete water samples

    B. Greg Mitchell;Annick Bricaud;Kendall Carder;Joan Cleveland

  • Red tide detection and tracing using MODIS fluorescence data: A regional example in SW Florida coastal waters

    Chuanmin Hu;Frank E. Muller-Karger;Charles (Judd) Taylor;Kendall L. Carder

  • Euphotic zone depth: Its derivation and implication to ocean-color remote sensing

    Zhong Ping Lee;Alan Weidemann;John Kindle;Robert Arnone

  • Reflectance Model for Quantifying Chlorophyll- a in the Presence of Productivity Degradation Products

    Kendall L. Carder;S. K. Hawes;K. A. Baker;R. C. Smith

  • Atmospheric Correction of SeaWiFS Imagery over Turbid Coastal Waters: A Practical Method

    Chuanmin Hu;Kendall L Carder;Frank E Muller-Karger

  • Diffuse attenuation coefficient of downwelling irradiance: An evaluation of remote sensing methods

    Zhong-Ping Lee;Zhong-Ping Lee;Miroslaw Darecki;Kendall L. Carder;Curtiss O. Davis

  • Red Tides in the Gulf of Mexico: Where, When, and Why?

    John J. Walsh;J. K. Jolliff;J. K. Jolliff;B. P. Darrow;J. M. Lenes

  • Model for the interpretation of hyperspectral remote-sensing reflectance.

    Zhongping Lee;Kendall L. Carder;Steve K. Hawes;Robert G. Steward

  • A remote-sensing reflectance model of a red-tide dinoflagellate off west Florida1

    K. L. Carder;R. G. Steward

  • Long–range transport of giant mineral aerosol particles

    P. R. Betzer;K. L. Carder;R. A. Duce;J. T. Merrill

  • Performance of the MODIS semi-analytical ocean color algorithm for chlorophyll-a

    K.L. Carder;F.R. Chen;J.P. Cannizzaro;J.W. Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhongping Lee
Zhongping Lee University of Massachusetts Boston
Frank E. Muller-Karger
Frank E. Muller-Karger University of South Florida
Curtiss O. Davis
Curtiss O. Davis Oregon State University
Chuanmin Hu
Chuanmin Hu University of South Florida St. Petersburg
Cynthia A. Heil
Cynthia A. Heil Bigelow Laboratory For Ocean Sciences
John Walsh
John Walsh University of Alaska Fairbanks
Robert Arnone
Robert Arnone University of Southern Mississippi
Howard R. Gordon
Howard R. Gordon University of Miami
Mary Jane Perry
Mary Jane Perry University of Maine
Raymond C. Smith
Raymond C. Smith University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths that often benefit from additional expertise in related fields. For professionals seeking leadership roles in environmental policy or public administration, pursuing online MPA degrees can provide essential skills in management and governance within environmental sectors.

For those interested in the social dimensions of environmental challenges, combining an Environmental Sciences background with a degree in sociology is increasingly valuable. Exploring the best online bachelor degree in sociology programs offers a flexible path to understand human behavior and societal impacts on the environment.

Educators and researchers looking to advance their credentials while balancing professional commitments may consider doctoral programs online no dissertation, which reduce traditional barriers to doctoral education. These programs allow for deeper specialization, often benefiting environmental education and research fields.

Additionally, for educators focused on advancing their expertise, exploring the best Eds to EdD programs can streamline the transition from master's to doctoral level, further enhancing career opportunities in academic and policy-oriented roles related to environmental sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Kendall L. Carder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles