World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
10551
World Ranking
5462
National Ranking
2001

Stanford B. Hooker publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanford B. Hooker sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 244 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stanford B. Hooker D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanford B. Hooker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanford B. Hooker is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research focuses on several interconnected areas within earth and environmental sciences, primarily concentrating on oceanography and related environmental processes.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a specific emphasis on the subfields of Oceanography, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, and Atmospheric Science.

Stanford B. Hooker's research covers key topics such as:

  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Water Quality Monitoring Technologies

Their recent publications include:

  • A global end-member approach to derive a CDOM (440) from near-surface optical measurements, 2020, Biogeosciences
  • A compilation of global bio-optical in situ data for ocean colour satellite applications - version three, 2022, Earth system science data
  • Spectral range within global aCDOM(440) algorithms for oceanic, coastal, and inland waters with application to airborne measurements, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • The MALINA oceanographic expedition: how do changes in ice cover, permafrost and UV radiation impact biodiversity and biogeochemical fluxes in the Arctic Ocean?, 2021, Earth system science data
  • Airborne Radiometry for Calibration, Validation, and Research in Oceanic, Coastal, and Inland Waters, 2020, Frontiers in Environmental Science

Stanford B. Hooker frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Earth system science data
  • Biogeosciences
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Journal of Oceanography
  • Remote Sensing

Collaborative work is an important aspect of their career. The scientist regularly coauthors publications with researchers including:

  • Henry F. Houskeeper
  • Koji Suzuki
  • Raphael M. Kudela
  • Atsushi Matsuoka
  • Marcel Babin

Best Publications

  • Vertical distribution of phytoplankton communities in open ocean: An assessment based on surface chlorophyll

    Julia Uitz;Hervé Claustre;André Morel;Stanford B. Hooker

  • Examining the consistency of products derived from various ocean color sensors in open ocean (Case 1) waters in the perspective of a multi-sensor approach

    André Morel;Yannick Huot;Bernard Gentili;P. Jeremy Werdell

  • An overview of the SeaWiFS project and strategies for producing a climate research quality global ocean bio-optical time series

    Charles R. McClain;Gene C. Feldman;Stanford B. Hooker

  • An ocean-colour time series for use in climate studies: The experience of the ocean-colour climate change initiative (OC-CCI)

    Shubha Sathyendranath;Robert J.W. Brewin;Carsten Brockmann;Vanda Brotas

  • The calibration and validation of SeaWiFS data

    S.B. Hooker;C.R. McClain

  • Seawifs Postlaunch Calibration and Validation Analyses

    Stanford B. Hooker;Elaine R. Firestone;Charles R. McClain;Ewa J. Ainsworth

  • Assessment of uncertainty in the ocean reflectance determined by three satellite ocean color sensors (MERIS, SeaWiFS and MODIS-A) at an offshore site in the Mediterranean Sea (BOUSSOLE project)

    David Antoine;David Antoine;Fabrizio d'Ortenzio;Fabrizio d'Ortenzio;Stanford B. Hooker;Guislain Bécu

  • Ocean Optics Protocols for Satellite Ocean Color Sensor Validation

    James L. Mueller;Giulietta Fargion;J. L. Mueller;C. Trees

  • Algorithm development and validation for satellite-derived distributions of DOC and CDOM in the U.S. Middle Atlantic Bight

    Antonio Mannino;Mary E. Russ;Mary E. Russ;Stanford B. Hooker

  • Volume 25, Ocean Optics Protocols for SeaWiFS Validation, Revision 1

    Stanford B. Hooker;Elaine R. Firestone;James G. Acker;James L. Mueller

  • Pan-Arctic distributions of continental runoff in the Arctic Ocean

    Cédric G. Fichot;Karl Kaiser;Stanford B. Hooker;Rainer M. W. Amon

  • Is desert dust making oligotrophic waters greener

    Hervé Claustre;A. Morel;S.B. Hooker;M. Babin

  • An Evaluation of Above- and In-Water Methods for Determining Water-Leaving Radiances

    Stanford B. Hooker;Gordana Lazin;Giuseppe Zibordi;Scott McLean

  • Photoacclimation and nutrient-based model of light-saturated photosynthesis for quantifying oceanic primary production

    Michael J. Behrenfeld;Emilio Marañón;David A. Siegel;Stanford B. Hooker

  • Ocean Optics Protocols For Satellite Ocean Color Sensor Validation, Revision 4, Volume III: Radiometric Measurements and Data Analysis Protocols

    J. L. Mueller;A. Morel;R. Frouin;C. Davis

  • The Atlantic Meridional Transect: overview and synthesis of data

    J Aiken;N Rees;SB Hooker;PM Holligan

  • Phytoplankton pigment and absorption characteristics along meridional transects in the Atlantic Ocean

    RG Barlow;J Aiken;PM Holligan;DG Cummings

  • An autonomous above-water system for the validation of ocean color radiance data

    G. Zibordi;F. Melin;S.B. Hooker;D. D'Alimonte

  • An overview of the SeaWiFS Project

    Stanford B. Hooker;Wayne E. Esaias

  • An Intercomparison of HPLC Phytoplankton Pigment Methods Using In Situ Samples. Application to Remote Sensing and Database Activities.

    Hervé Claustre;Stanford B Hooker;Laurie Van Heukelem;Jean-François Berthon

  • SeaWiFS technical report series. Volume 25: Ocean optics protocols for SeaWiFS validation, revision 1

    Stanford B. Hooker;Elaine R. Firestone;James G. Acker;James L. Mueller

Frequent Co-Authors

David Antoine
David Antoine Curtin University
Hervé Claustre
Hervé Claustre Université Paris Cité
Giuseppe Zibordi
Giuseppe Zibordi National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Simon Bélanger
Simon Bélanger Université du Québec à Rimouski
Robert Frouin
Robert Frouin University of California, San Diego
Mati Kahru
Mati Kahru University of California, San Diego
Frank E. Muller-Karger
Frank E. Muller-Karger University of South Florida
Vanda Brotas
Vanda Brotas University of Lisbon
Raphael M. Kudela
Raphael M. Kudela University of California, Santa Cruz
Kenneth J. Voss
Kenneth J. Voss University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring environmental sciences in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities, often supported by various online degree programs. Many students seek flexibility and affordability, making programs like the best affordable online general studies degree programs an attractive starting point. These programs offer a broad educational foundation that can complement specialized environmental studies.

For those considering a bachelor’s degree, options identified as the easiest bachelor degree to get may appeal to students balancing other commitments or new to higher education. Such programs often emphasize practical skills and accessible curriculum, making them ideal for career changers or part-time learners.

Specialized degrees like the geology degree online offer targeted knowledge in earth sciences, critical for environmental consulting, natural resource management, and sustainability roles. These programs combine scientific theory with real-world applications relevant to environmental challenges.

Additionally, a geographic information systems degree equips students with skills in spatial analysis and mapping technologies. GIS expertise is increasingly vital for environmental monitoring, urban planning, and climate change research, providing strong career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Stanford B. Hooker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles