World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Diana Koszycki

Diana Koszycki

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
7075
World Ranking
7900
National Ranking
530

Diana Koszycki publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Koszycki sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Diana Koszycki D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Koszycki sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diana Koszycki is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Psychology and Medicine. Their work focuses extensively on clinical and experimental psychology topics, particularly addressing aspects related to anxiety, depression, and cognitive processes.

The scientist's research interests encompass areas including anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment approaches, and cognitive processes. Additional focal topics in their publications involve child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health treatment and access, medical imaging techniques and applications, mindfulness and compassion interventions, treatment of major depression, and psychotherapy techniques and applications.

Diana Koszycki has co-authored with various researchers, with several frequent collaborators such as Jacques Bradwejn, Wenhui Jiang, Fang Fang, Wenqing Zhao, and Jianyin Qiu. These collaborations reflect a network engaged in psychological and clinical studies.

Their publication record includes contributions to several established venues, among which are:

  • Research Square (4 publications)
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (2 publications)
  • BMC Cancer (2 publications)
  • BMC Psychiatry (2 publications)
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (1 publication)

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Diana Koszycki include:

  • "Randomized trial of cognitive behaviour group therapy and a mindfulness-based intervention for social anxiety disorder: Preliminary findings" (2020) published in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Other significant related works they have been involved in or associated with cover a range of topics within psychotherapy and mental health treatment, as shown by publications in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics and Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Citalopram and Interpersonal Psychotherapy on Depression in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The Canadian Cardiac Randomized Evaluation of Antidepressant and Psychotherapy Efficacy (CREATE) Trial

    Nancy Frasure-Smith;Diana Koszycki;Louis T. van Zyl;Brian Baker

  • Randomized trial of a meditation-based stress reduction program and cognitive behavior therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder.

    Diana Koszycki;Melodie Benger;Jakov Shlik;Jakov Shlik;Jacques Bradwejn;Jacques Bradwejn

  • Enhanced sensitivity to cholecystokinin tetrapeptide in panic disorder. Clinical and behavioral findings.

    Jacques Bradwejn;Diana Koszycki;Christian Shriqui

  • Prenatal Social Support, Postnatal Social Support, and Postpartum Depression

    Ri-Hua Xie;Guoping He;Diana Koszycki;Mark Walker

  • Cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide induces panic attacks in patients with panic disorder.

    Jacques Bradwejn;Diana Koszycki;Greg Meterissian

  • Evaluation of anxiolytic properties of Gotukola--(Centella asiatica) extracts and asiaticoside in rat behavioral models.

    P. Wijeweera;P. Wijeweera;J.T. Arnason;D. Koszycki;Z. Merali

  • The panicogenic effects of cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide are antagonized by L-365,260,a central cholecystokinin receptor antagonist, in patients with panic disorder

    Jacques Bradwejn;Diana Koszycki;Anne Couëtoux du Tertre;Harold van Megen

  • A double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the effects of Gotu Kola (Centella asiatica) on acoustic startle response in healthy subjects.

    Jacques Bradwejn;Yueping Zhou;Diana Koszycki;Jakov Shlik

  • A multifaith spiritually based intervention for generalized anxiety disorder: a pilot randomized trial†

    Diana Koszycki;Kelley Raab;Fahad Aldosary;Jacques Bradwejn

  • Investigation of cholecystokinin system genes in panic disorder.

    J L Kennedy;J Bradwejn;D Koszycki;N King

  • Influence of depression and effect of treatment with sertraline on quality of life after hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome.

    J.Robert Swenson;Christopher M O'Connor;David Barton;Louis T Van Zyl

  • Imipramine antagonism of the panicogenic effects of cholecystokinin tetrapeptide in panic disorder patients.

    J. Bradwejn;D. Koszycki

  • The cholecystokinin hypothesis of anxiety and panic disorder.

    Jacques Bradwejn;Diana Koszycki

  • Knowing when not to use the Internet: Shyness and adolescents' on-line and off-line interactions with friends

    Fiorenzo Laghi;Barry H. Schneider;Irene Vitoroulis;Robert J. Coplan

  • Association of the Val158Met catechol O-methyltransferase genetic polymorphism with panic disorder.

    Claudia Rothe;Claudia Rothe;Diana Koszycki;Jacques Bradwejn;Nicole King

  • Double-blind Comparison of the Effects of Clonazepam and Lorazepam in Acute Mania

    Jacques Bradwejn;Christian Shriqui;Diana Koszycki;Greg Meterissian

  • What clinicians want: findings from a psychotherapy practice research network survey.

    Giorgio A. Tasca;John Sylvestre;Louise Balfour;Livia Chyurlia

  • Candidate genes in panic disorder: meta-analyses of 23 common variants in major anxiogenic pathways

    As Howe;Henriette Nørmølle Buttenschøn;A. Bani-Fatemi;E. Maron

  • Dose ranging study of the effects of cholecystokinin in healthy volunteers.

    J Bradwejn;D Koszycki;M Bourin

  • Effect of CI-988 on cholecystokinin tetrapeptide-induced panic symptoms in healthy volunteers.

    Jacques Bradwejn;Diana Koszycki;Michel Paradis;Phillip Reece

  • Behavioral, cardiovascular, and neuroendocrine profiles following CCK-4 challenge in healthy volunteers: A comparison of panickers and nonpanickers

    Diana Koszycki;Diana Koszycki;Robert M. Zacharko;Jean‐Michel Le Mellédo;Jacques Bradwejn

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacques Bradwejn
Jacques Bradwejn University of Ottawa
James L. Kennedy
James L. Kennedy Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Franco J. Vaccarino
Franco J. Vaccarino University of Guelph
Barry H. Schneider
Barry H. Schneider Boston College
Giorgio A. Tasca
Giorgio A. Tasca University of Ottawa
Zindel V. Segal
Zindel V. Segal University of Toronto
Alastair J. Flint
Alastair J. Flint University of Toronto
Roberto Baiocco
Roberto Baiocco Sapienza University of Rome
Fabio Macciardi
Fabio Macciardi University of California, Irvine
Jürgen Deckert
Jürgen Deckert University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open the door to a range of rewarding careers. Many students explore related fields like Social Work, which shares a focus on helping individuals and communities thrive. If you’re considering Social Work as a career pathway, you’ll find a variety of high-quality programs across the country.

For students in the western U.S., the top social work degrees in Utah offer a blend of academic excellence and practical experience. Those located on the East Coast may want to explore the best social work programs in Virginia, renowned for their comprehensive training and diverse practicum options.

If you are looking for strong options in Appalachia, the best social work degrees in West Virginia can prepare you for a variety of settings, from schools to hospitals.

Online study can also provide flexibility for working professionals. If you’re seeking advanced credentials with minimal barriers, consider the easiest online social work doctorate degrees in the US, which offer accessible pathways to both academic and clinical leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Diana Koszycki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles