World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
8571
World Ranking
10523
National Ranking
658

Andrei Voronkov publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrei Voronkov sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 276 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrei Voronkov D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrei Voronkov sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrei Voronkov is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their work spans multiple areas within computer science and medicine, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement. The main fields of study for their publications include Computer Science, with 33 contributions, and Medicine, with 2 contributions.

The subfields of study demonstrate a focus on Artificial Intelligence, covering 23 publications, along with Computational Theory and Mathematics represented by 8 works. Additional interests include Hardware and Architecture, Software, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

The primary topics explored by Voronkov involve logical systems and formal verification techniques. These include:

  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques

Their recent published papers illustrate the scope of research and its evolution over recent years. The listed works are:

  • Induction with Recursive Definitions in Superposition, 2021, published in reposiTUm (TU Wien)
  • Opportunities for improving personnel situation assessment in community pediatric services: a retrospective analytical descriptive study, 2023, published in Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin
  • Partial Redundancy in Saturation, 2025, published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Collaborative efforts appear significant in their research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Laura Kovács (12 joint publications)
  • Márton Hajdú (9 joint publications)
  • Petra Hozzová (9 joint publications)
  • Johannes Schoisswohl (4 joint publications)
  • Giles Reger (3 joint publications)

Publications have appeared in venues such as reposiTUm (TU Wien), Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin, and arXiv (Cornell University), reflecting both traditional peer-reviewed outlets and open-access repositories.

Best Publications

  • Complexity and expressive power of logic programming

    Evgeny Dantsin;Thomas Eiter;Georg Gottlob;Andrei Voronkov

  • Handbook of automated reasoning

    Alan Robinson;Andrei Voronkov

  • The design and implementation of VAMPIRE

    Alexandre Riazanov;Andrei Voronkov

  • First-Order Theorem Proving and Vampire

    Laura Kovács;Andrei Voronkov

  • Automated Deduction—CADE-18

    Andrei Voronkov

  • Path Feasibility Analysis for String-Manipulating Programs

    Nikolaj Bjørner;Nikolai Tillmann;Andrei Voronkov

  • Finding Loop Invariants for Programs over Arrays Using a Theorem Prover

    Laura Kovács;Andrei Voronkov

  • Sine Qua non for large theory reasoning

    Kryštof Hoder;Andrei Voronkov

  • Complexity and expressive power of logic programming

    E. Dantsin;T. Eiter;G. Gottlob;A. Voronkov

  • Vampire 1.1

    Alexandre Riazanov;Andrei Voronkov

  • PDFX: fully-automated PDF-to-XML conversion of scientific literature

    Alexandru Constantin;Steve Pettifer;Andrei Voronkov

  • Handbook of Automated Reasoning (in 2 volumes)

    John Alan Robinson;Andrei Voronkov

  • AVATAR: The Architecture for First-Order Theorem Provers

    Andrei Voronkov

  • The Anatomy of Vampire Implementing Bottom-up Procedures with Code Trees

    Andrei Voronkov

  • Handbook of Automated Reasoning: Volume 1

    J. Robinson;Andrei Voronkov

  • Term indexing

    R. Sekar;I. V. Ramakrishnan;Andrei Voronkov

  • Splitting without backtracking

    Alexandre Riazanov;Andrei Voronkov

  • Vampire 1.1 (System Description)

    Alexandre Riazanov;Andrei Voronkov

  • Limited resource strategy in resolution theorem proving

    Alexandre Riazanov;Andrei Voronkov

  • Current Trends in Theoretical Computer Science

    Anatoli Degtiarev;Y Gurevich;A Voronkov

  • Interpolation and Symbol Elimination

    Laura Kovács;Andrei Voronkov

  • Chapter 26 – Term Indexing

    R. Sekar;I.V. Ramakrishnan;Andrei Voronkov

Frequent Co-Authors

Yuri Gurevich
Yuri Gurevich University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nikolaj Bjørner
Nikolaj Bjørner Microsoft (United States)
Franz Baader
Franz Baader TU Dresden
Geoff Sutcliffe
Geoff Sutcliffe University of Miami
Michael Kifer
Michael Kifer Stony Brook University
Aart Middeldorp
Aart Middeldorp University of Innsbruck
Armin Biere
Armin Biere University of Freiburg
Kenneth L. McMillan
Kenneth L. McMillan Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s worth exploring related online degrees that open doors to versatile tech careers. Engineering fields like cheapest mechanical engineering degree online offer practical knowledge for roles in robotics, automation, and manufacturing. If you are interested in foundational sciences, you may check out affordable online physics degrees to build analytical and problem-solving skills valued in programming and research roles.

Data is transforming industries, making data science programs highly relevant for students keen on analytics, AI, or big data. For those drawn to technology and circuits, online electrical engineering courses USA offer remote study options for a field that overlaps with computer hardware, networking, and embedded systems.

These online degree pathways not only make advanced education more affordable and flexible, but also broaden career opportunities in tech, research, and engineering—whether you’re just starting out or upskilling for the future.

Best Scientists Citing Andrei Voronkov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles