World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
31
Citations
4870
World Ranking
13544
National Ranking
5405

Geoff Sutcliffe publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoff Sutcliffe sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Geoff Sutcliffe D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoff Sutcliffe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoff Sutcliffe is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States and specializes in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, and Software. Their research portfolio includes 66 publications within these domains.

Their work centers on several key topics, including:

  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Semigroups and automata theory
  • Advanced Database Systems and Queries
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization

Geoff Sutcliffe has authored multiple research papers, with notable recent publications being:

  • "The logic languages of the TPTP world" (2022), published in Logic Journal of IGPL
  • "The CADE-27 Automated theorem proving System Competition - CASC-27" (2020), published in AI Communications
  • "The CADE-28 Automated Theorem Proving System Competition - CASC-28" (2022), published in AI Communications
  • "Improving probability selection based weights for satisfiability problems" (2022), published in Knowledge-Based Systems
  • "The 11th IJCAR automated theorem proving system competition - CASC-J11" (2023), published in AI Communications

The venues where this researcher frequently publishes include:

  • AI Communications
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
  • Kalpa publications in computing
  • Logic Journal of IGPL

Geoff Sutcliffe collaborates regularly with a number of co-authors, such as:

  • Alexander Steen
  • Christoph Benzmüller
  • Jack McKeown
  • David Fuenmayor
  • Martin Desharnais

Best Publications

  • The TPTP Problem Library and Associated Infrastructure

    Geoff Sutcliffe

  • The TPTP Problem Library

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Christian Suttner

  • The TPTP Problem Library

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Christian B. Suttner;Theodor Yemenis

  • Starexec: A cross-community infrastructure for logic solving

    Aaron Stump;Geoff Sutcliffe;Cesare Tinelli

  • The TPTP Problem Library and Associated Infrastructure: From CNF to TH0, TPTP v6.4.0

    Geoff Sutcliffe

  • The state of CASC

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Christian Suttner

  • MaLARea SG1 - Machine Learner for Automated Reasoning with Semantic Guidance

    Josef Urban;Geoff Sutcliffe;Petr Pudlák;Jiří Vyskočil

  • Evaluating general purpose automated theorem proving systems

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Christian B. Suttner

  • The 4th IJCAR Automated Theorem Proving System Competition - CASC-J4

    Geoff Sutcliffe

  • The CADE ATP System Competition — CASC

    Geoff Sutcliffe

  • Automated Reasoning in Higher-Order Logic using the TPTP THF Infrastructure

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Christoph Benzmüller

  • The TPTP world - infrastructure for automated reasoning

    Geoff Sutcliffe

  • Using the TPTP language for writing derivations and finite interpretations

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Stephan Schulz;Koen Claessen;Allen Van Gelder

  • The development of CASC

    Francis Jeffry Pelletier;Geoff Sutcliffe;Christian Suttner

  • Using the TPTP language for writing derivations and finite interpretations

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Stephan Schulz;Koen Claessen;Allen Van Gelder

  • The TPTP typed first-order form with arithmetic

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Stephan Schulz;Koen Claessen;Peter Baumgartner

  • THF0 --- The Core of the TPTP Language for Higher-Order Logic

    Christoph Benzmüller;Florian Rabe;Geoff Sutcliffe

  • TSTP Data-Exchange Formats for Automated Theorem Proving Tools

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Jürgen Zimmer;Stephan Schulz

  • ATP and Presentation Service for Mizar Formalizations

    Josef Urban;Piotr Rudnicki;Geoff Sutcliffe

  • A Computational Future for Preventing HIV in Minority Communities: How Advanced Technology Can Improve Implementation of Effective Programs

    C. Hendricks Brown;David C. Mohr;Carlos G. Gallo;Christopher Mader

  • SRASS - A Semantic Relevance Axiom Selection System

    Geoff Sutcliffe;Yury Puzis

Frequent Co-Authors

Josef Urban
Josef Urban Czech Technical University in Prague
Andrei Voronkov
Andrei Voronkov University of Manchester
Stephan Schulz
Stephan Schulz University of Duisburg-Essen
Deborah L. McGuinness
Deborah L. McGuinness Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Allen Van Gelder
Allen Van Gelder University of California, Santa Cruz
Gerard de Melo
Gerard de Melo Hasso Plattner Institute
Cesare Tinelli
Cesare Tinelli University of Iowa
Koen Claessen
Koen Claessen Chalmers University of Technology
Guillermo Prado
Guillermo Prado University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of related programs and pathways. For students interested in a solid STEM foundation, online physics degrees can be a great choice, offering flexibility and affordability.

If you are drawn to trends in data, machine learning, and analytics, consider following a data science learning path. Many universities now offer online data science degrees, catering to both beginners and those looking to advance their skills.

Technology enthusiasts may also want to explore accredited online electrical engineering programs. These programs teach the hardware, circuits, and systems that often complement computer science studies.

Finally, for those seeking quick entry into the workforce or side career growth, there are numerous easy licenses and certifications to get — perfect for boosting your resume and job prospects with minimal time investment.

Best Scientists Citing Geoff Sutcliffe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles