World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
9775
World Ranking
4882
National Ranking
219

Dirk Beyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Beyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Dirk Beyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dirk Beyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dirk Beyer is affiliated with the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on various areas within Computer Science, with a significant emphasis on software-related disciplines.

The main fields of study covered by Dirk Beyer include:

  • Computer Science

Within this broad area, their work spans several subfields such as:

  • Software
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Hardware and Architecture

The scientist's research touches on numerous specific topics, including:

  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Logic, Programming, and Type Systems
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Security and Verification in Computing

Dirk Beyer has contributed to several recent papers, some of which are:

  • Verification Witnesses (2022) published in ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • A retrospective study of one decade of artifact evaluations (2022) published in Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
  • Decomposing software verification into off-the-shelf components (2022) published in Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • European benchmarking of determinants of profitability for companies with accrual accounting in the agricultural sector (2020) published in Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika)
  • Interpolation and SAT-Based Model Checking Revisited: Adoption to Software Verification (2022) published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Dirk Beyer include:

  • Thomas R. Lemberger
  • Nian-Ze Lee
  • Marian Lingsch-Rosenfeld
  • Po-Chun Chien
  • Matthias Kettl

The venues where Dirk Beyer often publishes are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Automated Reasoning
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Dirk Beyer has also contributed to book publications with Springer Science+Business Media, including titles such as:

  • Verification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation (2020)
  • NASA Formal Methods (2022)
  • TOOLympics Challenge 2023 (2024)

Best Publications

  • The software model checker B last : Applications to software engineering

    Dirk Beyer;Thomas A. Henzinger;Ranjit Jhala;Rupak Majumdar

  • CPACHECKER: a tool for configurable software verification

    Dirk Beyer;M. Erkan Keremoglu

  • Generating tests from counterexamples

    Dirk Beyer;Adam J. Chlipala;Thomas A. Henzinger;Ranjit Jhala

  • Configurable software verification: concretizing the convergence of model checking and program analysis

    Dirk Beyer;Thomas A. Henzinger;Grégory Théoduloz

  • Path invariants

    Dirk Beyer;Thomas A. Henzinger;Rupak Majumdar;Andrey Rybalchenko

  • Web service interfaces

    Dirk Beyer;Arindam Chakrabarti;Thomas A. Henzinger

  • Reliable benchmarking: requirements and solutions

    Dirk Beyer;Stefan Löwe;Philipp Wendler

  • Software model checking via large-block encoding

    Dirk Beyer;Alessandro Cimatti;Alberto Griggio;M. Erkan Keremoglu

  • Strategies for product-line verification: case studies and experiments

    Sven Apel;Alexander von Rhein;Philipp Wendler;Armin Groslinger

  • Symbolic invariant verification for systems with dynamic structural adaptation

    Basil Becker;Dirk Beyer;Holger Giese;Florian Klein

  • Software Verification and Verifiable Witnesses

    Dirk Beyer

  • Detection of feature interactions using feature-aware verification

    Sven Apel;Hendrik Speidel;Philipp Wendler;Alexander von Rhein

  • Clustering software artifacts based on frequent common changes

    D. Beyer;A. Noack

  • Reliable and Reproducible Competition Results with BenchExec and Witnesses Report on SV-COMP 2016

    Dirk Beyer

  • Competition on software verification

    Dirk Beyer

  • Predicate abstraction with adjustable-block encoding

    Dirk Beyer;M. Erkan Keremoglu;Philipp Wendler

  • Explicit-State software model checking based on CEGAR and interpolation

    Dirk Beyer;Stefan Löwe

  • Efficient relational calculation for software analysis

    D. Beyer;A. Noack;C. Lewerentz

  • Program Analysis with Dynamic Precision Adjustment

    D. Beyer;T.A. Henzinger;G. Theoduloz

  • Invariant synthesis for combined theories

    Dirk Beyer;Thomas A. Henzinger;Rupak Majumdar;Andrey Rybalchenko

  • Software Model Checking via Large-Block Encoding

    Dirk Beyer;Alessandro Cimatti;Alberto Griggio;M. Erkan Keremoglu

  • Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems : 24th International Conference, TACAS 2018, Held as Part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2018, Thessaloniki, Greece, April 14-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part I

    Dirk Beyer;Marieke Huisman

  • Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems : 25 Years of TACAS: TOOLympics, Held as Part of ETAPS 2019, Prague, Czech Republic, April 6-11, 2019, Proceedings, Part III

    Dirk Beyer;Marieke Huisman;Fabrice Kordon;Bernhard Steffen

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas A. Henzinger
Thomas A. Henzinger Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Sven Apel
Sven Apel Saarland University
Rupak Majumdar
Rupak Majumdar Max Planck Institute for Software Systems
Ranjit Jhala
Ranjit Jhala University of California, San Diego
Bernhard Steffen
Bernhard Steffen TU Dortmund University
Roberto Sebastiani
Roberto Sebastiani University of Trento
Ahmed E. Hassan
Ahmed E. Hassan Queen's University
Andrey Rybalchenko
Andrey Rybalchenko Microsoft (United States)
Alessandro Cimatti
Alessandro Cimatti Fondazione Bruno Kessler

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science doesn’t just mean earning a bachelor’s degree. There are a variety of related pathways that can enhance your skills and expand your career options, all available online. For those beginning their journey, easy associate degrees can provide foundational knowledge quickly and affordably, allowing you to enter the tech field or build credits for further education.

Continuing your education? Consider enrolling in one of the affordable masters degrees to gain specialized expertise or pivot to a new area within computer science. For those interested in leadership roles or academia, pursuing the online phd in organizational leadership or the cheapest doctorate of education online offers pathways to high-level positions and research opportunities.

With flexible learning formats and a range of affordable programs, online degrees in computer science and related fields can open doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Dirk Beyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles