World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark O. Kimberley

Mark O. Kimberley

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
35
Citations
5759
World Ranking
7315
National Ranking
95

Mark O. Kimberley publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark O. Kimberley sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 180 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Mark O. Kimberley D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark O. Kimberley sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark O. Kimberley is affiliated with Scion in New Zealand, with research primarily centered in the field of Environmental Science. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science, Environmental Engineering, and Ecology.

The scholar has contributed extensively to topics related to forest ecosystems and management. These topics include:

  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Tree Root and Stability Studies
  • Forest Biomass Utilization and Management

Kimberley's frequent publication venues indicate a consistent focus on forestry and ecological science. The most common journals where their work appears are:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Forests
  • Forest Ecosystems
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Wood Science and Technology

Recent publications by Mark O. Kimberley include:

  • "Effect of supercritical CO2 treatment and kiln drying on collapse in Eucalyptus nitens wood," 2020, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
  • "Natural forests in New Zealand - a large terrestrial carbon pool in a national state of equilibrium," 2021, Forest Ecosystems
  • "Impacts of forest harvest removal and fertiliser additions on end of rotation biomass, carbon and nutrient stocks of Pinus radiata," 2021, Forest Ecology and Management
  • "Quantifying Spray Deposition from a UAV Configured for Spot Spray Applications to Individual Plants," 2020, Transactions of the ASABE
  • "A Novel Approach to Modelling Stand-Level Growth of an Even-Aged Forest Using a Volume Productivity Index with Application to New Zealand-Grown Coast Redwood," 2021, Forests

The researcher often collaborates with other experts in forestry and related environmental sciences. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Michael S. Watt
  • Benjamin S.C. Steer
  • Hamish Pearson
  • Bruce Davy
  • Lloyd Donaldson

This body of work reflects a specialized focus on forest resources, sustainability, and ecological modeling, emphasizing the management and biological understanding of forested environments, wood properties, and the use of modern technology such as UAVs in forestry research.

Best Publications

  • Changes in planted forests and future global implications

    Tim Payn;Jean-Michel Carnus;Peter Freer-Smith;Mark Kimberley

  • Interception frequency of exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide

    Eckehard G. Brockerhoff;John Bain;Mark Kimberley;Milos Knizek

  • Diversity and succession of adventive and indigenous vascular understorey plants in Pinus radiata plantation forests in New Zealand

    Eckehard G Brockerhoff;Chris E Ecroyd;Alan C Leckie;Mark O Kimberley

  • Nationwide survey for invasive wood-boring and bark beetles (Coleoptera) using traps baited with pheromones and kairomones

    Eckehard G. Brockerhoff;Diane C. Jones;Mark O. Kimberley;D. Max Suckling

  • Effectiveness of the International Phytosanitary Standard ISPM No. 15 on Reducing Wood Borer Infestation Rates in Wood Packaging Material Entering the United States

    Robert A. Haack;Kerry O. Britton;Eckehard G. Brockerhoff;Joseph F. Cavey

  • Predicting how altering propagule pressure changes establishment rates of biological invaders across species pools

    Eckehard G. Brockerhoff;Mark Kimberley;Andrew M. Liebhold;Robert A. Haack

  • Distribution and abundance of small mammals in relation to habitat in Pureora Forest Park.

    C. M. King;J. G. Innes;M. Flux;M. O. Kimberley

  • Allometric Equations for Estimating Carbon Stocks in Natural Forest in New Zealand

    Peter N. Beets;Mark O. Kimberley;Graeme R. Oliver;Stephen H. Pearce

  • Airborne scanning LiDAR in a double sampling forest carbon inventory

    Peter R. Stephens;Mark O. Kimberley;Peter N. Beets;Thomas S.H. Paul

  • The influence of weed competition for light and water on growth and dry matter partitioning of young Pinus radiata, at a dryland site

    Michael S. Watt;David Whitehead;Euan G. Mason;Brian Richardson

  • Economic analysis of growth response from a pine plantation forest applied with biosolids

    Mark O Kimberley;Hailong Wang;Peter J Wilks;Craig R Fisher

  • Population biology of the ship rat and Norway rat in Pureora Forest Park, 1983–87

    J. G. Innes;C. M. King;M. Flux;M. O. Kimberley

  • A UNIVERSAL SPRAY DROPLET ADHESION MODEL

    W. A. Forster;M. O. Kimberley;J. A. Zabkiewicz

  • PROTECTIVE VALUE OF REGENERATING TEA TREE STANDS ON EROSION-PRONE HILL COUNTRY, EAST COAST, NORTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND

    D. O. Bergin;M. O. Kimberley;M. Marden

  • Development of models to predict Pinus radiata productivity throughout New Zealand

    Michael S. WattM.S. Watt;Michael S. WattM.S. Watt;David J. PalmerD.J. Palmer;David J. PalmerD.J. Palmer;Mark O. KimberleyM.O. Kimberley;Mark O. KimberleyM.O. Kimberley;Barbara K. HöckB.K. Höck;Barbara K. HöckB.K. Höck

  • Coarse woody debris decay rates for seven indigenous tree species in the central North Island of New Zealand

    P.N. Beets;I.A. Hood;M.O. Kimberley;G.R. Oliver

  • Biosolids-derived nitrogen mineralization and transformation in forest soils.

    Hailong Wang;Mark O. Kimberley;Mirko Schlegelmilch

  • Soil CO2 flux dynamics in the two main plantation forest types in subtropical China

    Xinzhang Song;Huanying Yuan;Mark O. Kimberley;Hong Jiang

  • SPIRAL GRAIN PATTERNS IN PLANTATION-GROWN PINUS RADIATA

    D. J. Cown;G. D. Young;M. O. Kimberley

  • Comparison of spatial prediction techniques for developing Pinus radiata productivity surfaces across New Zealand

    David John Palmer;David John Palmer;Barbara K. Hock;Mark O. Kimberley;Michael S. Watt

  • Indices of interspecific plant competition for Pinus radiata in the central north island of New Zealand

    Brian Richardson;Mark O. Kimberley;John W. Ray;Graham W. Coker

Frequent Co-Authors

Eckehard G. Brockerhoff
Eckehard G. Brockerhoff Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Hailong Wang
Hailong Wang Foshan University
David J. Lowe
David J. Lowe University of Waikato
Raphael K. Didham
Raphael K. Didham University of Western Australia
Robert A. Haack
Robert A. Haack US Forest Service
Andrew M. Liebhold
Andrew M. Liebhold Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
David Whitehead
David Whitehead Landcare Research
Chengxiao Hu
Chengxiao Hu Huazhong Agricultural University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in Ecology and Evolution also explore related health, science, and environmental career paths. If you're bringing a passion for science to the healthcare field, accelerated online degree options are available. Programs such as msn direct entry programs online allow students with non-nursing backgrounds to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles.

Those already holding an RN credential can advance their expertise through various bridge programs, like rn to msn bridge programs. These offerings are increasingly delivered by non profit online university options—helping to ensure quality education with flexible schedules.

Comparing program quality and value is essential. Resources like top rated online nursing schools wgu help prospective students make informed choices. Whether you aim to work in research, public health, or patient care, there are various online pathways to propel your career forward.

Best Scientists Citing Mark O. Kimberley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles